The Business of Magazines | Page 141 | the Fashion Spot

The Business of Magazines

Finally, it took them long enough. British Glamour will be ditching their travel sized editions in favour of the more standard version. I quite like the size of the American edition, not too big nor small.

I see UK Cosmo's strategy of selling a full-size magazine for £1 has forced UK Glamour into second place, and now it's trying to catch up.

It makes me wonder what UK Marie Claire will do, in order to compete with them. A redesign isn't going to cut it in the cover price war.
 
It makes me wonder what UK Marie Claire will do, in order to compete with them. A redesign isn't going to cut it in the cover price war.

Especially not such a 'unique' redesign. I don't hate it, but I doubt whether it attracts impulse buyers. It's too ambitious, especially for their demographic. I mean, I loved InStyle, and look what happened to them. Maybe MC will just continue to fatten the magazine with free mascara and whatnot? It's what drives the majority of their sales. All those journalism and editors awards count for naught.
 
glamour have the force that is conde Nast behind them.

I don't think Marie Claire have one an award for years. I don't understand why they haven't gone full on slick glossy?!
 
I feel like the long-term plan is for her to succeed Glenda, if they'd be prepare to guarantee her a great deal of creative laissez faire. Someone at Hearst must've given this idea some thought. It'll certainly let Wintour quake in her boots. Could be wishful thinking on my behalf, though.

Hearst to Publish CR Fashion Book
By Kristen Heinzinger | November 21, 2016

Carine Roitfeld is intensifying her relationship with Hearst Magazines. The Harper’s Bazaar global fashion director has looked to the company to publish and lead revenue for CRFashionBook.com, while PubWorX, Hearst’s joint venture with Condé Nast, will manage and oversee printing, production, and distribution for her biannual CR Fashion Book.

As part of the agreement, Hearst will monetize digital and social content and create custom programs for CRFashionBook.com. It will also provide audience amplification, editorial services, and syndication of CR Fashion Book digital content across the Hearst Magazines Digital Media portfolio, according to the release. Print ad sales will be overseen by CR Fashion Book’s publisher Jorge Garcia, while Vladimir Restoin Roitfeld has been appointed president of CR Fashion Book Ltd., the newly created company that will publish the magazine and produce all editorial content.

“I love working with the editors and executives at Hearst Magazines; I trust them and they trust me,” Roitfeld said in a press release. “I have the freedom to express myself creatively and reach tens of millions of readers around the world in Harper’s Bazaar, and now I have found a home where CR Fashion Book can continue grow and thrive, both in print and online.”

Source: https://fashionweekdaily.com/hearst-to-publish-cr-fashion-book/
 
Anna Wintour could put a dog on her cover and still single-handedly beat HB under Carine (if ever). Carine shines when she does things provocatively. I can't see her doing commercial covers ala Bazaar. Plus, it became apparent to me that a huge part of her magic was the photographers. I can't remember an iconic Carine ed post VP. All of the ones that made a statement were the ones under M&M, I&V.

But I seriously think that she's bound to succeed Glenda. But the question is, what are they waiting for. Glenda seems to be a gem in Hearst.
 
Anna Wintour could put a dog on her cover and still single-handedly beat HB under Carine (if ever). Carine shines when she does things provocatively. I can't see her doing commercial covers ala Bazaar. Plus, it became apparent to me that a huge part of her magic was the photographers. I can't remember an iconic Carine ed post VP. All of the ones that made a statement were the ones under M&M, I&V.

You'll want to take a look at the Marie Antoinette-themed issue of CR FB, Mon. Also, when you say 'a huge part of her magic was the photographers'....this simply isn't true. That's basically like saying that she's not a strong stylist. I will admit that I've read this more than once on this forum. And it leads me to believe that maybe her former followers are not only obsessed with prestige (photographers), but cannot deal with the fact that she evolved into a less provocative direction. As it is, provocation in 2016 is a fruitless concept. Everybody will just shrug and move on. Say whatever you want about her, but compared to the top 4 Vogue editors, she's probably the only one prepared to give underrated fashion professionals a platform while gunning for original and fresh content in each issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Condé Nast Shutters Self Magazine in Print, More Cuts on the Way

Condé Nast is said to make bigger restructuring moves around the new year.

By Alexandra Steigrad on December 1, 2016

Condé Nast is closing Self magazine in print, WWD has learned.

The publisher confirmed the news and said it would continue operating Self.com, and that executive digital director Carolyn Klystra would be named editor in chief. The closure entails roughly 20 job cuts, including the termination of Self editor in chief Joyce Chang, who was brought on in 2014 to succeed the ousted Lucy Danziger. At the time, Chang was said to have signed a three-year contract, which is set to expire.

Condé said Self’s regular print production will end with its February issue. In the future, the glossy will publish special print editions around multiple health and wellness-related moments.

Self has been slowly slimming down since last fall when it folded its advertising team into Glamour’s business division. It continued to de-layer over the summer when the title continued to combine social and editorial teams with Glamour.

Last year around this time, Condé Nast had been toying with various scenarios, such as folding Self or Details. It opted to shutter Details. There had also been buzz of closing Teen Vogue in print — a persistent rumor that hasn’t fully materialized. (Instead, the company recently decided to cut the magazine’s frequency to four issues a year from nine, months after it moved editor in chief Amy Astley to Architectural Digest.)

After a few redesigns and a reduction in frequency from 12 to 10, Self was unable to move the needle much in terms of sales. According to the Alliance for Audited Media, the magazine’s total paid and verified circulation hovered around just under 1.5 million with single-copy sales around 44,000 in the first half of 2016. Before Chang joined Self, circulation in 2014 was just more than 1.5 million with total-single copy sales reaching 148,055. Nonetheless, it’s nearly impossible for any editor to reverse the changes taking place in print today. In order to salvage the title, Condé focused on digital, and it hired Kylstra, an editor from Buzzfeed and site director of Women’s Health. Under her stewardship, she’s been able to grow traffic to a high of 5.1 million uniques in September, according to comScore.

Artistic director Anna Wintour underscored the importance of digital and wellness as a category to the company, offering: “Audiences are more discerning than ever about how they live, and in Self, we have a popular and established brand that speaks directly to the burgeoning health and wellness movement. Carolyn has played a pivotal role in refining and focusing Self and understands how to create content that excites and inspires our audiences.”

The Self news comes as employees at Condé Nast brace for layoffs beginning this week. Insiders said the bulk of the job cuts would take place around the new year, as Jim Norton, who recently joined the company as chief business officer and president of revenue, reshapes the business side. It is also believed that further job cuts will come after Condé’s recent announcement that it would combine the creative, research and copy teams across the company. As a result, magazines will share creative directors, copy editors and researchers. (The New Yorker will retain some research and copy editors.) Those specific layoffs are likely to be part of a larger change, which will also include a reorganization of the business side.

On a larger scale, the New York-based publisher, under chief executive officer Bob Sauerberg, is being streamlined so that he only has a handful of direct reports. They include artistic director Wintour; David Geithner, chief financial officer; Norton; Dawn Ostroff, president of Condé Nast Entertainment; Fred Santarpia, chief digital officer; JoAnn Murray, chief human resources officer, and Cameron Blanchard, chief communications officer.

Although it may be a subtle change, now employees, depending on their department, report in to those executives. For instance, publishers and marketers report to Norton, digital staff reports to Santarpia, communications teams report to Blanchard and editors report to Wintour.

Condé declined to elaborate when asked if Wintour oversees the more prominent editors in chief, such as Vanity Fair’s Graydon Carter and The New Yorker’s David Remnick, who long have insisted on their independence and reported first into S.I. Newhouse Jr. and later to then-chairman Charles Townsend, who is retiring at the end of the year.

Source: http://wwd.com/business-news/media/conde-nast-closes-self-magazine-10715645-10715645/
 
No no, first TeenVogue completely, then Allure. I think Allure's concept outlived it's usefulness.
 
People have a huge appetite for beauty - and beauty products - but all of the action is online, so if there's any magazine that should be trying to switch the focus from print to their social media/website, it's Allure. But I get the feeling they could be left behind on every count.
 
i feel like many of these magazines are forgetting their heritage and integrity, something online sites just don't have, and it's confusing to the reader when they have no vision or consistency in art direction. If nobody is buying InStyle UK in print, why are they necessarily going to want it in digital?
 
Rumours of the creative director leaving UK Marie Claire.

I'm guessing the redesign hasn't been a success?
 
UK Glamour are clearly going all guns blazing to get back on top and outsell Cosmo.

The cover price has been slashed permanently to £1.
 
^ how is it feasible to sell mags for £1? in australia, Cosmo costs $7.95 which is about £4.70! does ad revenue and a surge in buyers from the lower price really make up for it? do they print on a lower quality paper?
 
When you have such a tremendous circulation, then yes! I'd say by charging one quid for an issue, it ultimately means that more people will buy into the magazine, and this reach will make Cosmo more attractive to their advertisers. It should be pretty much the same all over the world. They'd go bust if they charge £4.70. I must admit, generally all your country's magazines are far too expensive! Vogue Australia very often surpass the price of US Vogue, for instance. Probably there's still a lot of interest in print over there, cannot justify the prices otherwise.
 
Charging £1 for an issue has implications with subscriber figures however, it's a bit of a double edged sword. You have to start slashing your subscriber offers to essentially a year for £10 in order to make it worthwhile for someone to do it.

It could be that Glamour knew the newsstand sales were where there money comes from rather than with subscribers, so it made sense to make it more readily available that way.

That's what always bothered me about British Vogue's cover reductions. Where I am you could pick up every issue over the past year or two for about £2.99, making it no cheaper to be a subscriber in the long run.
 
So many of the uk monthlies have editors that need to move on to let the magazine get into new hands.
Glamour and Marie Claire are brilliant brands but just so tired as magazines.
 
Also, if you subscribe to Conde Nast magazines, you don't receive any of the cover-mounted free gifts, so if subscribing doesn't offer financial savings, you're better off getting the newsstand copy.
 
So many of the uk monthlies have editors that need to move on to let the magazine get into new hands.
Glamour and Marie Claire are brilliant brands but just so tired as magazines.

I think you can add Vogue to that list, but not Harper's. Justine is doing a stellar job imo. Of course there's no sex in Harper's, but Cosmo's £1 deal would really give you a proper bang for your buck (pun intended).
So yes, Vogue, Glamour and MC can be revamped and it seems the only way would be to get someone new in. I'm anxious to see who will take over at Elle and what it will look like. I'm not a fan of the magazine, but I believe it actually performs well which is baffling.

You do love your samples, Tigerrouge! Lol. True though, I'd much rather get a reduced newsstand issue WITH samples, than subscribing with just one fancy gift. The only time I get do get impatient is when I must wait a few days after a stunning cover/review is released (which rarely ever happens in Vogue's case anyway)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,328
Messages
15,296,879
Members
89,277
Latest member
ScarfLover
Back
Top