The Business of Magazines

Felix Dennis, multi-millionaire publishing mentalist, talks a bit about Maxim and how to launch magazines, as reported by a Media Guardian blog on 5 May:

Felix Dennis: Maxim made $3bn and now is the time to innovate again

'Feel free to report back to your colleagues that Felix Dennis has lost the plot,' says Dennis as he outlines how the cavalier Maxim approach might just be the model for future magazine successes.

Felix Dennis, chairman and founder of Dennis Publishing, said today that Maxim magazine had generated more than $3bn (£2bn) since he launched the title almost 15 years ago.

Addressing the FIPP World Magazine Congress, in London, Dennis used his cavalier and anarchic approach to publishing Maxim as an example of how others could innovate their way out of an economic downturn and urged magazine publishers to seize the opportunities presented by the current downturn.

"Conservatively, after doing my homework I estimate that worldwide Maxim has to date generated over $3bn in profits for its publishers, distributors, licensees, licensors and its owners, and the actual figure may be much higher. Now, that's a chunk of change for a rag born in a smoke-filled London pub," he said.

He told delegates that the current economic climate would be seen in 10 years' time as "one of the greatest financial opportunities in the history of our industry" as innovative magazine producers would take up the mantel to create new, innovative publications.

Dennis told delegates how, against the better advice of a magazine consultant, he launched Maxim "in the middle of a recession" in the US in 1997, two years after launching in the UK.

"He told me 'this is a bad idea, it's likely to fail… categorically I urge you to reject it out of hand'," Dennis said as he told delegates how ignoring this advice had led to his title peaking with sales of 2.5m in the US – "more than the total circulation of all the other men's magazines combined" – and spawning imitators across the industry.

Dennis eventually sold his US magazine interests to private equity firm Quadrangle Capital Partners in 2007 for a rumoured $240m (£121m), keeping his UK edition under licence.
"In many territories Maxim will continue to shower golden rain of useful know-how and irreverent idiocy on readers as well as making its publishers a ton of money. And in many countries, believe it or not, is still growing. And not just on the web," he said.

The UK edition announced last month it was closing its print edition after 14 years to become online only. Despite this, Dennis added, it was its free-wheeling innovation – including telling the US press that a pet hamster was now the title's editor – that made it a success and will likely bring success in an economic downturn.

"Feel free to report back to your colleagues that Felix Dennis has lost the plot," he told delegates. "And that as a poet he lives in a lyrical dream of the distant past and that his little company now poses little possible threat to rivals in this room, that he will not be poaching any of your best staff, who will not be scouring the world to spend his ill-gotten gains setting up titles or launching new websites against you.

"And that the bearded dwarf is fast asleep in his dilapidated pirate ship while the Dennis Publishing crew is dying, sinking into sloth and drunken idleness. Good luck to you ladies and gentlemen in these harrowing times. Magazines are going through a very rough patch, but we are not done yet. Not by a very long shot.

"I predict that in 10 years' time, many of us will be gathered in another venue, nattering and bargaining, and telling each other the same old lies for the same old reasons.
"But those who will to embrace the once in a lifetime circumstances the recession offers, opportunities to restructure, to change, to grow by acquiring distressed assets and to gather ourselves for the sunlit uplands of the digital future, for all those individuals and those companies, the murderous recession of 2008/2009 and perhaps 2010, will come to be viewed for what it really was: one of the greatest financial opportunities in the history of our industry."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/may/05/pressandpublishing-magazines
 
A Media Guardian blog brings us some more waffle from the FIPP magazine conference:

Elle's digital publisher says "reinvent the revenue model."

Digital head from Elle magazine's French owner Lagardere calls on publishers to rid portfolios of weaker titles and dedicate resources on those that will last.

Oliver Luft
Wednesday 6 May 2009

The head of digital at Lagardere, the French owners of Elle, said today magazine publishers needed to "reinvent their revenue models" to focus solely around key titles that would be "strong enough to survive the next five to ten years."

Speaking at the FIPP World Magazine Congress in London today, Didier Quillot, chief executive of Lagardere Active, said publishers should slim portfolios and increase the extension of key brands as a route to future survival as the media industry was suffering a "structural crisis".

"We have to reinvent the revenue model. This reinvention will be will be based on two or three things. Number one is brand," he said.

"We have strong brands but we don't only have strong brands in our portfolio, I'm not talking just about Lagardere Active but more general community of publishers.
"I think we should concentrate on developing and spending money and allocating resources only on our strong brands.

"If you believe, like I believe, that we not only face a not only a cyclical crisis but a structural one, we have to select which brands in our portfolio are strong enough to survive within the next five to ten years."

Traditional advertising revenue lost by the economic slump and structural changes to the industry would not return, he said, nor would revenue lost through falling print circulations.

"The internet is nice but it will stay small, it will do somewhere between 5% of our business at worst and 20% at best, but no more. Internet, at best, will just compensate for the decline of revenue to me from banner circulation. Internet is not an escape," he said.

Publishers needed to look for new revenue streams online, such as data management, to bolster coffers along side taking their magazine titles into new areas, he said.
Investment in key brands, he said, would was needed to move from print to joint print/web publication, develop new mobile platforms and branch out into events, B2B businesses and customer publishing brand extensions.

He said that since launch online Elle France built to 2.5m unique users each month, but this audience was not enough to sustain the title, so they created a blogging network round the site to encourage greater user engagement.

Elle has also partnered with local specialists in Japan to develop an ecommerce business, he said, and he would look to forge partnerships with mobile service providers to generate revenue through phones and build applications for iPhones and similar devises.

"We should transform our brand from pure mono-media brands to pure media brands that are implemented everywhere," he added.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/may/06/magazines-pressandpublishing
 
And another conference story from the same source:

'Nonsense' that print will disappear, says Condé Nast's Newhouse

Stephen Brook
Wednesday 6 May 2009

Jonathan Newhouse, chairman of Condé Nast International, said today that print and paper would never disappear from the media industry.

"To those that believe that paper and print will disappear, I have only one word – nonsense," he said to applause and the FIPP World Magazine Conference in London.

Newhouse, whose company publishes Vogue, Vanity Fair and GQ, said that the changing media market and the advent of digital meant did not mean that international magazine brands did not have a bright future.

"It is the brand, the idea and its expression, that matters more than the product printed on paper," he said.

"Magazines are a powerful medium that have never failed to connect with an audience in a market where they have been introduced. There is a pleasure in the tactical sensation of pages and holding the world in one's hands that can never be replaced."

Newhouse said it was wrong to claim that young people were no longer interested in magazines, as research for Condé Nast's own magazine Glamour showed that 40% of its readers across its international editions were aged 15 to 24, and its advertisers continually told the company that they wanted to reach older women.

If magazines did not supply original content on their websites then they faced an uncertain future but this was not the same as saying that print was doomed because even in an online world readers turned to magazine sites related to their area of interest, such as Vogue.com for fashion or Runner's World for information about running races, rather than stand alone sites.

"Advertisers, facing oversupply of websites, turn to magazine websites as a safe haven and guarantee of quality," he said.

Newhouse conceded that times were tough, not in the least because consumers have more choice so "some magazine brands may suffer and fall by the wayside".

His advice was simple. "So what is the answer? Make a great magazine, it is easy to say but hard to do. But that is the name of the game.

"Love your readers and your advertisers and they will love you back.

"The future will be golden and if you love our magazines you can make it come true."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/may/06/conde-nast-magazines
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand why blonde hair and blue eyes is always seen as "classic". It's a phrase that irks me, and the article claims so several times. It's as though other hair colors or eye colors or races are trendy or new. yet people of all different races have been around forever, just as long as blonde hair and blue eyes. The media should be building a new idea of what's classic, not enforcing old stale stereotypes.

Also why is blonde and blue eye "safe"? I just don't get it. It there something dangerous about brunettes or redheads? What's the difference between having a blonde as the face of a company and a brunette. Does hair color really send a different message? hairstyle maybe... but color?

The article that you have read must most certainly published written by a UK or American publication. Blond hair and blue eyes is the symbol of Arian nations such as the US, UK, Germany and Norway. From a business perspective it's only natural to have people with "traditional" national appearance traits to spread covers. Nothing is unusual about it and the same practise is adopted elsewhere in the world. Remember that US Vogue or US Elle's target market is the USA and not the rest of the world.
 
I understand their target is the USA. I live in the USA. I just think that when the media continues to use such wording as "classic" or even "traditional" for describing a hair color and eye color, it just hold us back. I don't know about other countries, but in the USA we are all certainly not just blonde and blue eyed, and those traits don't seem to be such an overwhelming majority that the media should insist on it being "safe" or related.

I just believe that this old way of thinking is simply holding the media, art and design, and even fashion back in it's capabilities of representing, accepting, and admiring everyone. Not simply because it's the diverse thing to do, but simply because that's how life should be.
 
Is Print Media Folding?

In the past few years we have seen a couple of major magazines folding, the latest being German Amica which published its last issue for June 09. The closing down has affected all kinds of magazines from men's magazines like King to mainstream fashion magazines. It spawns across all continents even in Africa, Cosmopolitan Kenya didnt last that long. Do you think the forum/blog, online press and the social networking site have replaced the print magazine and newspaper?

image stylefrizz.com
eva-mendes-amica-germany-june-2009-cover.jpg


www.newsmax.com
Long gone are the days when President Kennedy said he got more out of The New York Times than out of the CIA.

The print media is besieged. Foreign bureaus of newspapers and national magazines have been closed by the score all over the world.

Washington's National Press Building has dozens of offices for rent. Daily newspapers are dying in print and reincarnated online, where they compete with everything from free blogs to free social networks such as YouTube, Flickr, Twitter, Facebook, and FriendFeed.

Newspaper bankruptcy attorneys are prospering. And few people can remember accurately what they caught on television news as they get the kids ready for school, or stagger home from an exhausting day at the office. Untold millions get their news fix online while at the office.


Almost 250 million of the 338 million people in North America are online — a 73.1 percent penetration, according to Internetworldstats.com. (Asia has 650 million on the Internet, which is only 17.2 percent of its population.) Politico reported last week that, "for the past two years, several hundred left-leaning bloggers, political reporters, magazine writers, policy wonks and academics have talked stories and compared notes in an off-the-record online meeting space called JournoList."


Although JournoList may sound like the kind of place where dominant media culture gurus meet to set the agenda, site creator Ezra Klein, a 24-year-old American Prospect blogger, told Politico it's just a place "where journalists and policy wonks can discuss issues freely."

JLister Eric Alterman, a left-wing writer for The Nation, concedes he's seen discussions that start on the JournoList enter the dominant news stream beyond.


Politico's Michael Calderone reported, "Last April, criticism of ABC's handling of a Democratic presidential debate took shape on JList before morphing into an open letter to the network, signed by more than 40 journalists and academics — many of whom are JList members." JListers' echo chamber ranges from liberal to left-wing.


Technorati, which keeps tabs on World Wide Web developments, is tracking 113 million blogs — not including 73 million Chinese blogs. How younger reporters can discern between legitimate news and mental lucubrations remains a mystery.

Ernest Hemingway said any good reporter needed a built-in bullfeathers detector. But this becomes a real challenge when confronted with 10,000 possible answers on Google.


A central theme of the "Global Guerrillas" blog for the past five years has been that the traditional nation-state "is caught in the grip of two aggressive groups of super-empowered global guerrillas — the global barons of financial capitalism attacking from above and tribes/gangs/and terrorists thrusting from below," according to a recent post on the blog. The nation-state clearly is losing its struggle with these groups, the blog said.

And this is already going mainstream. A "Global Guerrillas" post entitled "Zeitgeist Watch" said that Matt Taibbi's article for Rolling Stone, "The Big Takeover," captures this shift, now spreading across the Internet virally via blogs and social networks.


Another offering that would sound legitimate to a younger reporter with little foreign experience is a report from the Iranian broadcaster Press TV, "CIA Report: Israel will fall in 20 years," which documents a CIA study that reportedly casts doubt on Israel's survival.

The report, republished on a number of blogs, goes on to quote international lawyer Franklin Lamb as saying that more than 500,000 Israelis — 300,000 in California alone — hold U.S. passports, and Israelis who do not have a Western passport have already applied for one.


The palpably fraudulent is interspersed with legitimate columns by Nobel economics prize-winner Paul Krugman, who writes that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's plan to detoxify toxic subprime mortgage assets is "hocus-pocus," or Igor Panarin, dean of Russia's Foreign Ministry school for future diplomats, saying in his regular, state-guided TV program that President Obama will order martial law this year as the U.S. splits into six rump states before 2011.

Many other whoppers also stretch credulity. How to sift fact from fancy in this global digital soup has not yet been taught in schools of journalism.


Jonathan Lebed, who puts out the widely read Lebed.biz newsletter, wrote that "the upcoming gold boom will be bigger than the dot-com and real estate booms combined because the dollar bubble is much larger than the previous bubbles at their peaks combined, and as the dollar starts to collapse in a downward spiral, gold could literally go to infinity. When I predict gold goes to $5,000 per ounce over the next few years, this is only if (Federal Reserve Chairman) Ben Bernanke, Obama and the Congress reverse course immediately. Every day that goes by where Congress distracts Americans with nonsense while the Federal Reserve prints trillions in new dollars, the odds increase that we will see hyperinflation and gold will go much higher than $5,000 per ounce."

Lebed correctly predicted the imminent collapse of the real estate market in 2005.


Unedited blogs rapidly are becoming news sources. Much of it is scary stuff, from nightmarish economic and financial meltdowns to chilling war attractions to come in the Middle East. The collapse of daily print journalism is a threat to democracy itself. How to distinguish between clutter and good stuff is a constant challenge as attention becomes a scarce resource.


"Something of historic proportions is happening," shouts "a student of history" who claims to have written 15 books in six languages. A perfect storm is brewing, he writes as he casts Obama as a populist leader out of the 1930s.


Peter Morici, former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission, is all over TV, radio, and the Internet with dire warnings of worse things to come: At best, we'll be taken back to 1970s France; at worst, 1700s France — before the revolution of 1789.

Morici, who teaches at the University of Maryland's business school, said, "What's becoming quite apparent is the Obama administration really isn't in control. It doesn't really understand what the various programs and proposals it's putting out there are going to cost. And the sad thing is, all this spending is not going to get us out of the recession, because so much of the money is so poorly spent."






© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
 
i think the newspapers are dieing (and a good thing too in my opinion) but magazines and fashion glossies in particular occupy a very different place in our culture.
 
Never gonna happen, yeah its a tough time now, but mostly smaller magazines are getting folded for the obvious reason.Print will never die, no matter what anyone says imo.
 
i think print is adapting, not dying. I can't speak for newspapers outside my own country, but the australian newspapers are definitely evolving to try and fit into the wider media context now that is so obsessed with up-to-date, breaking, live feeds etc etc. They have more citizen journalism, they update their websites frequently even pre-empting their own print-versions, and they are adding new sections to the papers, sometimes increasing editorial and opinion. I think some papers feel that the cold, hard, quick facts are easily delivered through the internet and what can really be offered by newspapers now is the opinion pieces.

I think magazines are a different case all together however, and probably in a lot less of a perilous state as newspapers are. Lots of magazines are folding, it's true, but the big names will definitely survive, despite any innovations of internet culture/phenomenon, which may not spell much for variety and choice, but does at least show that magazines have some staying power and still serve a purpose. (entertainment, comfort, inspiration)...
 
I will never stop buying printed magazines!
Have some of you guys heard something about PARADIS magazine? Latest info I got was they were going to launch a new issue in september, that means we have to wait more than a year for a new issue! These are bad times for independant magazines. :(
 
These are bad times for independant magazines. :(

Only the strongest will float ashore unscratched from the recession. Confectionery shops are overstored on magazine, especially those independent niche magazine. Visiting a magazine shop I sometimes scratch my head while flicking through some unknown magazine wondering who on earth buys it.

Print media is not dying, all it's getting is a fist to the ribs from online media. Top publishers have finally recognised that internet is now a place where many people receive their news. Online and print media will go hand in hand in the years to some, though revenue generation will tip towards the online side.
 
Has it already been posted about i-D cutting down to six issues a year?
 
>> INSIDER WIRE —We just lost Mixte, T magazine was downsized and now another cult fashion favorite is suffering at the behest of this economy: i-D magazine is cutting its number of issues per year from twelve down to six, according to its founders Terry and Tricia Jones.

via Fashionologie
 
omg, thats shocking i-D just went bi-monthly! :shock:

Hopefully this move will allow them to have more time to create better content for
each issue, as I feel their content has dropped significantly these days in quality, each issue has quite similar editorials

Anyone knows when would the bi-monthly starts? :unsure:
 
SCOOP DU JOUR: MEGA CONTRACT MACHINATIONS

Which power magazine is facing the the finish date of that mega-photographer's blue chip contract with the publication? The Hiss Squad is a tizzy at the thought of what might happen should said book fail to close a new deal soon. The creation of fashion's most valuable free agent? More room for a new generation of photographers to play ? A rethink of the nature of long term contracts? Mega drama!
theimagist


Anyone knows who's the photographer? :unsure:

Meisel and VI I was thinking...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^long terms contracts ...
mega-photographer ...
power magazine ...

heu ... wow ! coz i'm thinking the exact same thing !
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,702
Messages
15,196,719
Members
86,688
Latest member
lovecucu
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->