How much weight do ads have in magazines?
Once again I answer one of your questions.
Interesting question, hard answer. Certainly there are lots of counter arguments or denials. I think it's fair to talk about this. I promised I would answer all your questions.
Advertising is what keeps a publication alive, economically speaking. Advertising weighs a lot in the budget. The advertisement pages are fundamental, without them publications would not ne able to support themselves financially.
Fashion brands, accessory brands, such as shoes, bags, glasses, and watches, luxury brands, cosmetics, fragrances, champagne producers, acoholic beverages or just beverages. These are generally clients of a fashion magazine.
These type of products invest in a magazine by buying pages off them and putting in those pages what they like as I long as it's not offensive.
They don't become however partners. To clarify this point,
it's like when a custode comes in a shop, buys an outfit and owns that outfit, not the shop. They buy pages, not the magazine, the magazine is managed by the editorial team.
Does advertisement have an impact on the choices made by the magazine? Of course. But it doesn't influence them. It's a long history that never finds solace, the readers tend to think that it's all about business, all is decided for, and there is no room for young people who don't buy pages for advertising.
One of you asked: "Is there room for someone new against these advertising empires?" Of course there is room, and
many of them became famous thanks to a magazine's support.
They become famous, big names pick them, and they find the funds to invest in pages to promote their products. When they enter the realm of the big names, everyone will say that they made it because they bought off pages for advertisement.
Who gave them the first opportunity? If they are so good, why don't they have the room they deserve? If they are even better, why don't they get more room?
Are the choices based upon merit? Yes. We don't sell covers, we don't sell editorial pages. The important names are many and don't leave space to small ones? Everyone has gone through that, and certainly in the past there weren't so many opportunities for young people.
Competitions, shows, presentations, events, publications on papers. All financed by Vogue. This is not helping? Is it not free advertising? If you are really talented, you will climb up even higher.
To fell suffocated by big advertisements is not an excuse. It's to hide behind the real issue: not to feel adequate. The real problem are not the magazine, but companies that invest on young people in the hopes of finding the "next" Armani. After a season, when there aren't immediate results, they either eliminate them or cut their funds, and ads.
To support young people we even have a publication called
Vogue Talents that comes out once a year in September to point out interesting young people on the market. A way to expose their product, to put them in touch with companies and interest them in helping them.
It's not being generous. It's an investment.
We need new creative people as much as we need publicity. We know how to handle it and create a balance.
Franca Sozzani