The Business of Magazines

Hearst Magazines UK closes SHE and Cosmopolitan Bride
Hearst Magazines UK has announced that its titles SHE and Cosmopolitan Bride will close with immediate effect. The last issue of SHE will be on August 16 and the last Cosmopolitan Bride on August 25. The decision to close the magazines was made following the acquisition of Hachette Filipacchi by Hearst Magazines' parent company, Hearst Corporation, earlier this week (rep'd August 1). Meribeth Parker, Group Publishing Director, Hearst Magazines UK says, 'Following the acquisition of Hachette Filipacchi, we have looked at our business and made the decision to close both SHE and Cosmopolitan Bride to ensure our company is as robust and adaptable as possible for the future.'
 
I'm surprised about Cosmo Bride - I always thought it did pretty well. Bridal magazines usually have huge readership.

She's not a surprise at all..
 
If EasyLiving wasn't owned by Conde Nast then that would close.
 
I don't think this was posted when it was announced...

This November Rankin will be launching his new magazine, The Hunger.

Not just a fashion magazine, this bi-annual publication aims to transcend seasons and cycles and instead produce content that will encourage it’s readers to embrace the current – whilst staying hungry for more.

Each issue will feature two covers, a male and a female, and will include features about those people that have propelled culture forward in their own fields. Shot entirely by Rankin, it will celebrate artistic ambition from the past to the upcoming, offering inspiring imagery and original editorial about fashion, art, technology, comedy, travel, literature, world affairs and entertainment.
 
Vogue was the only American fashion magazine to show a newsstand sales increase in the first half of 2011, thanks to its March Lady Gaga cover. The pink-haired Gaga image drove sales up by more than 100,000 copies over the March 2010 Vogue issue, which featured Tina Fey on the cover; and overall, the magazine averaged 360,000 copies at the newsstand during the first half of this year, up 12.7 percent.
Harper's Bazaar, meanwhile — which was up 10 percent during the first half of last year when the rest of fashion magazines were down — dropped 14.3 percent to 137,117. “It would be a lot easier if we could feature proven sellers like Jennifer Aniston or Gwyneth Paltrow on the cover every month, but we took some risks this year and tried stars that were a little outside of the norm for us, and they didn’t always translate into newsstand sales,” editor-in-chief Glenda Bailey admitted. Among those departures: Julianna Margulies for January 2011, Kim Kardashian for March 2011, and Courteney Cox for April 2011.
W — which has never relied on newsstand sales — was down 11.8 percent to 19,006, and Elle was down 9 percent to 250,056.
 
Elle
Best Selling : March - Katy Perry
Worst Selling: May - Gwen Stefani

W
Best Selling : March - Mila Kunis
Worst Selling : May - January Jones

Harper's Bazaar
Best Selling : June - Britney Spears
Worst Selling : January - Julianna Margulies

Vogue
Best Selling : March - Lady GaGa
Worst Selling : May - Reese Witherspoon
 
Funny to note that, out of the four magazines, 3 best-selling issues were the March issues and 3 worst-selling were the May issues.
 
081011_media-charticle.jpg

wwd

Link to the whole article
http://www.wwd.com/media-news/media-features/fashion-magazines-fall-at-newsstand-5048220
 
Tough Times at the Newsstand

Vogue has a lot to thank Lady Gaga for.

The title was the only one in the fashion magazine category to show a sales increase on the newsstand in the first half, and it was all down to the outre pop star’s appearance on the March cover. The shot, featuring a pink-haired Gaga wearing a breezy white gown with purple lips, drove sales up by more than 100,000 copies over the March 2010 issue, which featured a polar opposite type of celebrity: Tina Fey.

All in all, Vogue averaged 360,400 copies during the first half of this year at newsstand, up 12.7 percent.

Every other fashion title — with the exception of Allure, which was flat — dropped in the first half, some by more than double digits. However, the industry as a whole experienced a decline of 9.2 percent. “Fashion seems reflective of the overall trend right now,” said Jack Hanrahan, publisher of CircMatters. “Overall, only a few magazines are not doing so badly but, mostly, there are a lot of negative numbers.”

Time Inc.’s InStyle, down 8 percent for the period, remains the leader at the newsstand, selling an average of 570,272 copies, according to Audit Bureau of Circulations.

Marie Claire, down 21.5 percent in single-copy sales to 198,752, had the worst percentage newsstand decline among fashion titles for the half. “Our category in particular rises and falls when there are big strong female movies,” editor in chief Joanna Coles said, referring to earlier successes like “Sex in the City 2.” “This year, the movies for women have been much less interesting.”

Coles also took three months — April, May and June — to experiment with ensemble covers: a male-female movie star one featuring Bradley Cooper and Abbie Cornish; a “Glee” cover, and a female-female star cover with Ginnifer Goodwin and Kate Hudson.

“We just wanted to see if groups on the cover worked — actually the ‘Glee’ cover was OK, but people just didn’t respond to the other two,” she said. The April cover with Cooper and Cornish was the magazine’s worst performer so far this year. “I don’t think women like men on the cover of a women’s magazine,” Coles concluded.

As previously reported, Glamour got off to a bumpy start at the beginning of the year which didn’t improve: The magazine was down 17.5 percent in single-copy sales to 453,707 in the first half. Cindi Leive’s winning cover during the period was published in February with Kim Kardashian, proving that reality stars still have the power to trump the A-list celebrities on big fashion magazines (Kate Winslet, who appeared on the April cover, was the worst seller).

Harper’s Bazaar was up 10 percent during the first half of last year when the rest of the category was down, but the title stumbled this year, down 14.3 percent to 137,117.

“It would be a lot easier if we could feature proven sellers like Jennifer Aniston or Gwyneth Paltrow on the cover every month, but we took some risks this year and tried stars that were a little outside of the norm for us, and they didn’t always translate into newsstand sales,” editor in chief Glenda Bailey admitted.

For example, she put “The Good Wife” actress Julianna Margulies on the January cover and the change up from a big celeb resulted in the lowest sales of the period. “We are focused on producing great covers in the fourth quarter and beyond, and we won’t stop experimenting, both on the newsstand and on our subscriber copies,” she added.

People StyleWatch, traditionally a strong performer on the newsstand, faltered like almost everyone else, falling 11.8 percent to 504,504 copies in the first six months. Reese Witherspoon, once the golden girl of fashion covers, resulted in the title’s lowest single-copy sales (she was also a dud for Vogue), but Lauren Conrad, the reality star who continues to be a go-to cover girl, won out for the April issue. W, which has never relied on newsstand, was also down 11.8 percent to 19,006. It seems W readers loved Mila Kunis in the March issue but didn’t feel compelled to pick up the May one with January Jones.

Lucky continued its downward trend on the newsstand, declining 9 percent to 150,271. Elle, which counted Katy Perry as a newsstand winner in the first half, was also down 9 percent to 250,056.

wwd / august 10, 2011
 
Last edited by a moderator:
“It would be a lot easier if we could feature proven sellers like Jennifer Aniston or Gwyneth Paltrow on the cover every month, but we took some risks this year and tried stars that were a little outside of the norm for us, and they didn’t always translate into newsstand sales,” editor in chief Glenda Bailey admitted.

-_- Of course, Glenda. Of course.
 
Surely March issues sell well because there's more pages/content for the price, not just because of its cover star
 
I think anywhere you put Gaga. She'll sell. I can see her landing another Vogue cover next year. Hell! put her on the December issue. We can have a Christmas Gaga :D :D lol
 
Who needs to try on expensive items for a proper look, when you could mess around with scissors in front of your computer screen (professionaljeweller.com:(

Holition and Tatler partner for luxury 3D project

Holition, one of the leading drivers of augmented reality in the UK, has announced an exclusive collaboration with Tatler magazine.

The publication’s September issue will contain an augmented reality (AR) jewellery special, featuring multi-million pound rings that readers can ‘try on’, whilst sitting at their computer.

All that the reader will need is a pair of scissors – to cut out the ‘tip on’, a specially marked piece of paper which will be folded around the finger as guide for the AR – and a webcam.

The Tatler and Holition collaboration will feature world-famous jewellery houses including Boodles, Cartier, Chanel Fine Jewellery, Chopard, De Beers, Fabergé, Graff, Harry Winston, Louis Vuitton, Mikimoto, Tiffany and Van Cleef & Arpels.

The call to readers to experience AR in this way is thought to be a world first for consumer editorial.

Kate Reardon, editor of Tatler said: “I’m beside myself with excitement. We’re bringing together the worlds of high tech and high jewellery; frankly I’ll be spending the next week trying on diamonds at my desk.”

Jessica Walsh, Tatler’s jewellery editor added: “What excites me is that we have brought together the oldest magazine in the world with an industry steeped in heritage and tradition - and combined the two to create a 'first-time' digital innovation.

“Digital technologies are changing the way in which people interact with both media and brands and I am excited to be contributing to this shift through such an exciting initiative,” Walsh added.
 
Considering all the complaining in the Vogue Paris thread about Alt, have any numbers been released about how the magazine is doing, sales-wise, since Alt took over?
 
^ Not yet, but it will be interesting to see once they do. At this point its still way to early. Hopefully she will not stay at the helm of the magazine for long!
 
The ABC results came out, so figures for magazines the first half of this year:

COMPANY DOWN 17%

EASY LIVING / DOWN 7%

ELLE / UP .8%

GLAMOUR / UP .7%

GRAZIA / DOWN 3.9%

INSTYLE / DOWN 6%

MARIE CLAIRE / DOWN 10.4 %

STYLIST / UP 1.2%

VOGUE / HARPERS ARE STABLE.


With Natmags and Hearst merging, and with Company on sale for £1, I would be worried.

And at IPC, for two of their big flagships, (Instyle and Marie Claire) to be doing that badly and for the second time the figures have been down, there must be some serious conversations to have.

Interestingly, the good magazines that push boundaries, take risks and are visually amazing, are all doing well.
 
I can't imagine Company will keep going much longer. It's a pretty awful magazine. I'm surprised about InStyle - the magazine is definitely making a notable improvement and it's not exactly wanted for large cover stars lately.

It upsets me Glamour continues to increase. Awful magazine. And I'm happy Elle is increasing, I do think it deserves it.
 
Elle and Harpers really do deserve it. It seems they have both decided to target an audience and look and style and go 'all guns blazing' to do that in the best way.
They really know their audience and their reader.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,589
Messages
15,190,212
Members
86,486
Latest member
cnst4ncio
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->