Share your thoughts on the... 2025 Met Gala!
MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.
if i were you i wouldn't remove works from s/s 15. if you pay attention to professional rankings you would find that the majority of rankings count works in the span of at least one year.
I agree. Status and credibility are necessary when doing these kind of rankings; otherwise the placement of models fluctuates too much, and you literally have to update daily. (Does anyone else miss MDC's old ranking system as much as me???)
^Actually khyrk, I still keep a ranking based on MDC's old ranking. (You would GAGG if I told you my #1!!) I started it back in 2008, when I too though it was Natasha's turn at #1, but when MDC stopped actually RANKING the models last year I continued as I was, and as MDC formerly did. While I totally agree that it really is inappropriate to rank Icons, Supers, and Legends, it is VERY necessary to rank the TOP 50 Models with a number. ( I mean fifty IS a number, right?) Something about taking the actual numerical rank away makes the ranking seem instantly stagnant, and they almost become totally boring and old......fast. The old format made the rankings feel like The Kentucky Derby meets the Billboard charts. It was really nice when the rankings had the big updates usually in January and August and my model geek friends would bet (actually gamble money) where the models would be placed; especially after say a Vogue Paris cover, or 2x OG Prada for example.
Those were the days.
HA! That MDC ranking thread was gold to read! I wasn't a member then but you guys would really go at each other. It sometimes grew to scary levels...![]()