




He continues, “the style of Part 1 suits Part 1 because, you know, we always say these films are slightly about coming of age. But, when you take these iconic characters out of that framework of Hogwarts and you put them in this dangerous world. And they have to bury their first body, for example, or - there’s a moment in the film where Harry and Hermione dance for the first time. It’s full of proper sexual tension because they’re both teenagers and they’re at that stage where Ron’s left and there’s a sort of intimacy between them. So there are all sorts of corners that you turn because they’re young adults. And turning those corners in the real world is actually quite fun and interesting because the verity just seems to suit that.”
As fans know, shortly before the wedding is when the Seven Potters plan goes into action. Dan had a lot to stay about this scene, which he described as one of the most “daunting” they’ve ever shot.
“It was a highly technical visual effects scene,” he told us. How can he prove it?
“The one shot was 95 takes.” The press gasps.
“Yes, you may well recoil.” The press laughs.
Dan explained for us how the scene technically worked. It was a great description but wouldn’t make sense unless you saw him explaining it with his arm movements. In a nutshell, they used a computer-controlled camera that would film the “exact same shot at the exact same time” over and over again. They used this camera for each of the seven Harry’s in the room so they could make them all appear on screen at once. It took about ten takes for each Harry - hence the 95 takes for the one shot where you see them all standing together.
Towards the end of Part 1, Bellatrix and Hermione have a moment that was shot differently than most. David Yates revealed this when he was talking about being able to pull an audience into a theatrical experience: “There’s this torturing with Bellatrix. Emma was really keen to do this torturing scene. I said ‘it will be really great, and we have to be really careful of how we do it. And [Emma] completely gave herself to the process. What we did was we set up a couple of cameras and Helena got on top of Emma. Basically she was writing ‘mudblood’ on her arm. She was scoring it into her skin.”
“We just let the whole thing roll for about three or four minutes. In that three or four minutes there were some good bits, and some not so good minutes. And there were one or two really powerful bits where Emma was able to just let go a little bit and forget that she was acting. She’s still acting, but she lost herself in this process for a moment. And the screams were quite horrible to listen to. On the stage, everyone felt uncomfortable. Everyone just sort of stepped back a bit. It was a very odd energy in the room because she was kind of exploring... exercising demons really. And serving the scene in doing that. It was really interesting.”
i dunno, i find her cutting Jo off in the middle of the sentence and the constant religious allusion (as if she was pressing her to become a part of her congregation, to make her scream how she does believe in God when Jo has already said it in the beginning once and clearly wasn't going any deeper into it) throughout the talk really obnoxious. i hate it how, when she finally has someone extra intelligent, someone so imaginative who has so much interesting stuff to say as a guest, she behaves like she's on a tea break talk without any conversational manners.^I don't speak as an Oprah fan (I've never actually watched her show before), but she didn't come across as obnoxious to me.


