US Glamour September 2017 : Blake Lively by Nathaniel Goldberg | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

US Glamour September 2017 : Blake Lively by Nathaniel Goldberg

This picture is perfect. Blake Lively is not.
Ph: Nathaniel Goldberg
Stylist: Jillian Davison
Hair: Rod Ortega
Makeup: Kristofer Buckle
Manicure: Elle
Actress: Blake Lively


Glamour 9/17 Digital Edition
 
Halima's World
Ph: Benjamin Vnuk
Fashion Editor: Vanessa Chow
Hair: Lisa Raquel
Makeup: Virginia Young
Manicure: Naoka Saita
Model: Halima Aden


Glamour 9/17 Digital Edition
 
We Are Here
Ph: Bec Lorrimer
Stylist: Jaime Kay Waxman
Hair: Rachel Lee
Makeup: Kali Kennedy
Models: Cierra Blankenship, Kat McCreadie, Tevia Sheridan, Sena Nasser, Kelsey Van Soest, Sidney Kilian, Kayla Murphy


Glamour 9/17 Digital Edition
 
America is a State of Mind
Ph: Fabien Montique
Stylist: Anna Trevelyan
Hair: Miki, Sharon Miller
Makeup: Ayami Nishimura, Naiyana Garth
Manicure: Tori H, Stephanie Staunton
Designer: Virgil Abloh
Models: Stevie Dance, Madeleine Grynsztejn, Phoebe Lovatt, Renelou Padora, Rhada Medar, Grace Ladoja


Glamour 9/17 Digital Edition
 
This looks like it wasn't retouched. But it's not as bad, I guess.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are these models or real people? Don't think I've heard of them before. Some reality every now and then can be refreshing, but with Glamour it's month after month, edit after edit. It's getting old to burden your readers with this incessant 'agenda' issues.

Also, that image of Blake isn't 'perfect' to begin with actually.
 
I tire of magazines using agendas as a delayed attempt to copy whatever has become the hottest topic on social media.

They had their chance to promote real awareness of issues - and make a true impact - back in the days before the internet, when they had more of a monopoly on the readerships to whom they were communicating.

Some magazines did, but for other titles, what they're doing now is no more than lip service.

And in terms of their own survival, print publications have become more of a niche purchase - but instead of being produced as luxury items, magazines insist on turning themselves into second-rate carriers of the sort of content you can find online in an instant. No wonder nobody's buying.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,442
Messages
15,261,976
Members
88,452
Latest member
kuromelomi
Back
Top