US Harper's Bazaar 140th Anniversary Issue : Jennifer Aniston

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 45369
  • Start date Start date
^^So true,all of her covers blend into one for me,and some are literally the same.Like her two US Vogue covers,are exactly the same pose and angle.:blink:Did you see them? :ninja:
I laos agree with Tigerrouge,this is not good enough for their 140th anniversary issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She's the #1 cover seller in the states & that's all they care about...Well I guess it's good for them I have a subscription as I wouldn't be buying this...I'm very disappointed in the cover but have hopes for the content.
 
Why did i restrain myself from yelling at her when i saw her?(Glenda).Unbelievable.
 
Sorry but this looks like a July (summer) cover to me. What a disappointment.
 
Harpers confuses me. It's a great magazine with intelligent articles and it's quite strong editorially. But the covers look like they could come from any celebrity magazine?
 
I know - Redbook Bazaar. One year they're going all-out and sticking rhinestones on special copies (a trick recently copied by UK HB, but now they're doing absolutely nothing to celebrate being very old and distinguished. When you think of iconic Bazaar covers of recent times - never mind yesteryear - you've got to wonder (or weep).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How everyone in the US isn't bored to tears by her at this point amazes me...
and I kind of like her!!

She has said herself she isn't a fashion person yet she is on covers again and again...
Guess it's all about the benjamins!!
 
HP may not have the best covers, but I love it when they profile people in fashion and I love some of the features they have. I can't wait to get this.
 
I'm not even going to lie...I'm really excited for this! I'm in love with Jennifer. In love :heart: Can't wait.
 
I have to admit, Jen usually does look great on the red carpet. She stands out for the fact that she doesn't show up with the blinged out plunging gown and obnoxious wavy hair covered in gaudy jewels...

The cover however, is boring as s**t and not at all appropriate for an autumn cover.

She has a pretty face, so in that respect she isn't a bad choice (an unexpected one, but not bad). But couldn't they do something dramatic. Dark eyes, sleek angular hair, graphic black dress, dark wintery colored background...it's not hard. That's all off the top of my head so I'm thinking someone on Bailey's team could've done better...if not then they're being overpaid.
 
A fashion magazine celebrating its 140th anniversary with an overrated actress on its cover .... What a joke ....
 
omg who montaged that cover! the lettering! ugh! cant even comment on Aniston
 
subscriber's cover...from wwd...

18gj2p.jpg
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->