US Vogue March 2007 : Jennifer Hudson by Annie Leibovitz

Technically Liya has two covers... she was on the September 2005 fold out cover with other top models (Gisele, Daria, Natalia V., Karen Elson, Gemma Ward and others I believe).
 
Funny how this thread is 7 pages long without even one actual picture of the cover :innocent:
 
^I think its a testament to how incredibly groundbreaking this is.

Whatever happens or however you feel this is an important moment. Although there are other established actresses who could have gotten the cover I am glad that it went to Jennifer. Someone like a Naomi Watts, Natalie Portman or a Chloe Sevigny will always be featured within the pages of Vogue. Always. Dare I say it it won't be long before we see them on the cover of Vogue as they represent the precise kind of beauty Vogue likes. I'm not going to get into the politics of beauty that span across race, class, size and so forth but I'll just say that Naomi Watts getting a Vogue cover is not really news in the way that Jennifer getting a Vogue cover is. Vogue adores classically beautiful (bonus points for blondes) women who fit sample sizes. End of story. They are the bread and butter of the magazine and anyone who doesn't fit that mold is either shut out or pushed to the back burner.

In media we simply do not see images of women like Jennifer. It just doesn't happen. Apart from O magazine and its monthly picture of Oprah I cannot think of a single mainstream magazine that features plus sized women on its cover, let alone plus sized minority women. This is MAJOR, this is a chance for people to see an image of beauty that is similar to their own. I think were underestimating just how powerful that can be. I love Gwyneth almost as much as Anna does but its nice to see someone who is different depicted as beautiful and vital.

As for her fashion sense I have got to say that it is hard to be fashionable or to be considered fashionable when your body type is not made for many of the current looks. I speak from personal experience on this. Faith Akiyama, is absolutely right most of today's latest looks are designed with a lean frame in mind, one has to work twice as hard to look good. Designers aren't exactly clamouring to dress starlets that don't fit their samples. I'd wager she didn't get much attention from the until the reviews started rolling in. I think Jennifer's personal style is coming along nicely though. She has Andre Leon Talley by her side of course which has to be helpful :blush: I personally think she's got a very clear cut look working that very retro Hollywood glamour look, reminiscent to what the original torch singers would wear.



I for one cannot wait to buy this issue. Usually I complain for lack of models but I don't care this time. I'm so proud of her. This is a girl who is making it on talent and talent alone. She's not out there shaking her rump in music videos or cavorting with idle socialites, she's doing her thing and doing it well and people are noticing. So many of today's stars are famous for nothing more than wearing loaned frocks and showing up at parties. Her performance was mesmerizing in Dreamgirls, she blew some of the established actors off the screen. I think she deserves every bit of fame that comes her way. Its been so long since I've seen someone garner this much attention based solely on merit. Yes the hype around her is overwhelming but I'd much rather hear about Jennifer than about Paris Hilton or another of those vapid, overexposed twits who seem to be on the cover of everything else.

As for there only being one black or asian model at a time I know thats discussion for another topic but I've never understood the point of that either. Especially considering that people of African and/or Asian descent come in so many different varieties. But thats a long long post for another topic I suppose.

Back to Vogue. How much Trentini do we have this time around? Eventually were going to get an issue that is all Trentini from cover to cover.

Images: Yahoo Movies
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Beautiful, beautiful post Luxx!! Bravo! You articulated everything I wanted say so well. :clap:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Luxx, I agree with you. I follow Jennifer closely and I LOVE 99% of what she wears!
 
I'm glad Jennifer Hudson will be on the cover because it is so ground breaking and all, but honestly- I'm getting sick of all the hype about her! Granted, I haven't seen Dreamgirls yet, I guess I'm not one to judge. But honestly, once she wins the Oscar do you think we will see her in another movie? I doubt it.

edit: But about the fashion part, US Vogue hasn't really been putting people on the cover because of their fashion sense. It really goes by whose movie or album is coming out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wow. I cannot believe what a dilema this cover has caused amongst the forumn. Seriously, I don't really think I ever saw this coming. Especially since the cover has not even been released yet!

Look, lets all admit that we are NEVER going to have a model on the cover of US Vogue again, until Daria/Gemma officially turns "super," that's just how it goes.

I'm sorry, but I would MUCH rather see a Cinderella story like JHud, who is still SO uneffected by celebrity and praise, than someone like Renee or Nicole or Julia, who continually play themselves OVER AND OVER again and smiile and look pretty. At least this is something new. There's no denying that Jennifer is a beautiful woman, who, so far this award season, has been dressing her body perfectly. More so, Jennifer is probably the most representative person of America to be on the cover of this magazine in a long time.

Whatever, if the cover is beautiful, let it be! If the cover sucks, so be it. Jennifer was chosen by Vogue, and not the other way around, let's not make it her fault.
 
do we actually have any images???...
all this chat-chat and arguing and name-calling and we dont even have a single PHOTO...!!!!
relax people........relax.......
 
I think if we had to have someone who 'deserves to be on the cover' on their fashion and style merit, nobody would ever be able to agree on a good choice.

Style is so subjective and I don't believe that Jennifer Hudson is any less high fashion than most actresses out there. Very few of them have their own natural style, it is all created by their stylists. The difference with JH is that we saw her before she had access to all of these people wheras with Aniston or Kate Hudson we have always seen them 'styled' at awards shows, but is their look in candids anything to write home about? I think not.

I think snobbery about her having been on American Idol is playing a part here too. I have never understood this mentality that popular culture automatically equals bad or lower class. I enjoy the show enormously, does that make me less of a fashion lover?

Anyway I couldn't be happier about this choice, if we are not to have models on the cover, let's at least see some diversity with the stars/celebrities chosen.

Can't wait to see the cover!
 
i don't think we'll see a model on the cover of vogue for a while, since celebrities are what the public want. it's no longer about models
good on jennifer, in all her interviews she seems overwhelmed by her success.
fantastic post Luxx, and i agree it can only be a good thing that women can see jennifer on the cover and somehow relate to her, rather than looking down at their thighs in digust of themselves
after all, vogue still has good model editorials anyway (even if there is a certain model they feature every month..:lol: )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
haha after reading this therad and its wild and intressting disscussion, I really really really cant wait too see the cover :woot: :woot:


Jennifer Hudson its such a great choice for the march issue. this cover/issue is like HELLO SPRING and its huge.
 
If Trentini were to retire, Anna would basically have an emotional breakdown, then go off on Patricia Schmid and Coco Rocha about how marginal they are and she only used them for "variety" :rolleyes:
 
^ Do you think maybe she'd show up at Caroline's house late one night then launch into a tirade about how she doesn't need her anymore? Said tirade would cause Anna to collapse into tears and then Andre and Bee would have to come get her. Maybe they could even have Gisele call and leave a message like "Well, you'll always have me..."

I really feel like were going to get either a Daria or Gemma cover soon. Daria because she pretty much IS super and Gemma because she's run off to become a lil movie maven. We get one model cover per year right? They throw us that bone at the very least.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hahahaha it would be so funny if the magazine came out and it had someone else on the cover
 
liberty33r1b said:
is Caroline Trentini is this issue again, again, again???

I hope to God that won't happen...or I will... I will...nothing:ninja:
Grrr. I will still buy it for the ads. :doh:
 
I am not particularly excited about Jennifer Hudson but I feel compelled to jump in the discussion. Overall I think this is a positive thing more than it is negative. Some of the posters who question the choice come across as holier-than-thou, as if only they know who deserve to be on the cover of US Vogue. Well, do you know what goes into the decision-making process of a magazine with financial concerns as vast as US Vogue?

- US Vogue has evolved in such a way that it doesn't stand for high fashion but rather for American women who can afford high fashion. The magazine is a lifestyle inspiration rather than a fashion bible. And yes, there is a difference between these two. That's why US Vogue is never in a rush to put the latest Balenciaga or Givenchy on the cover, but it will find time for Michael Kors, Vera Wang, and Bill Blass. You don't see these designers gracing the cover of Paris Vogue or Vogue Italia. Granted, their being American helps gain coverage in US Vogue, but I think the philosophies/images behind these brands are perhaps a larger reason as to why they are featured. If you are willing to accept that US Vogue is about an inspiring lifestyle more than blue-blood fashion icons, the choice of Jennifer Hudson is logical. Who is living a sweeter American dream than she is?

- Magazines are less formuliac than you think. Even though most of the time they prefer an established name, sometimes they need to buck the trend by gambling on a new face. Part of that has to do with counterprogramming, part of that has to do with an editor's ambition of being credited with launching a new star before everyone else gets it. Vanity Fair backed Gretchen Mol, Details gave Wentworth Miller a chance, and Esquire chose Daniel Craig for a September cover even though Bond didn't come out until November. US Vogue is in the same market and needs to shake things up as much its competitors, so why shouldn't they choose someone unexpected once a year? Granted, I'd prefer they choose a model, but I'll give them credit for trying something new at least. At least Hudson has already won awards; Gretchen Mol was thrusted into spotlight before Rounders was released and then bombed.

- You get the cover of a publication because you are newsworthy, not because you deserve a career achievement award. Established stars get covers, as do flash-in-a-pans. The point I am trying to make is not how debatable Hudson's career longetivity is, but the simple fact that sometimes people get covers because they are having a moment. US Vogue, afterall, is in the business of selling magazines; it is not a council that gives out monthly stamps of approval on who defines current fashion.

- Are there people who are more deserving of a US Vogue cover than Jennifer Hudson? Perhaps. I'd wholeheartedly support a Naomi Watts cover, but timing is not on her side. Despite having been a model in Tokyo and a magazine editor in Australia, Naomi Watts for some reason doesn't get featured in the most mainstream of fashion magazines. She's had W, Elle, but not Bazaar. Whether the lack of visibility is her choice or not, I don't know, but the same misfortune is happening with her movie career. The Academy snubs her of a nomination everytime they have a chance to. Talk about a real bridesmaid. I prob. don't have to talk about Chloe Sevigny or Maggie Gyllenhaal because their situations have been summed up very well in previous posts on this thread.

- I think it is incredibly elitist to say that a one-time American Idol contestant does not deserve a Vogue cover. Natalia Vodianova was a fruit stand sales girl, mind you.

- As far as politics go, I feel that a magazine that is as financially reliant on advertisers and has willingly cooperated with Hollywood's PR schemes cannot operate with complete independence. Fashion purists would want every cover to be an aesthetic choice, but there you have Paris Vogue and Vogue Italia. Politics of some form will always enter the equation for US Vogue, be that race, a person's relationship with designers, or timing. One can treat Jennifer Hudson's being on a Vogue cover the way one did when one of the Williams sisters won a Wimbledon. Of course we all hope that one day the media won't overemphasize a winner's race, but in the present society, this is still very much an undeniable landmark. On the business side, I am sure being Andre Leon Talley's makeover project helps. At least he's picked out some pretty good outfits for her. I am not too crazy about the Kors dress at the SAG, but Jennifer has had some memorable looks, in particular a black Donna Karan dress with a gold plate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,827
Messages
15,200,384
Members
86,865
Latest member
G0pthes
Back
Top