US Vogue July 2006 : Kate Hudson by Mario Testino

sosneha said:
Thanks so much for the link Sosneha i love it too!:flower:
How cute and beautiful Kate looks and i love the clips of clothes and jewlery.
But what was that she tallked about sewing and stuff-lol!
Its great Vogue put this on i mean Vanity Fair had video shoots long ago.
I am looking forward to photoshoot videos!:lol:
 
Thanks for the scans, but please, for the love of all that is good and holy, resize them before posting!!!!!
 
:D I thought about resizing the photos and then I saw the quality of all of them and all of them were bad......so I opted out for the bigger size :blush:

Next time, I will resize the post :wink: !!

I*m glad that everybody is enjoying it though!!!!:heart: ^_^
 
as for the eds: i completely agree with what everyone else said, Stella is just boring. i always hoped they not gonna continue using her, i never really got her appeal either. she was great for chanel (which was, like, 10 years ago?), but i'd rather not see her in eds anymore......

Kate H. doesn't do it for me either, never has, and the ed just proves it. all the pics seem just so posed, like, the clothes are wearing her, and not vice versa. how dull.

the Gisele ed, however, is superb, that's all i can say about that one. looking forward to seeing it on paper, it's actually enough reason for me to buy this issue!! oh, and the featured clothes are lovely too....
 
iluvjeisa said:
IMO, her style isn't interesting enough to warrant 3 Vogue stories in 3 years. That could be ok for a style icon, but hardly for Kate Hudson.

so true...
it kills me how many great actresses there are out there that have never had a vogue cover...
and someone like kate hudson has 3
(or that britney spears has one!)
 
Preahya said:
:D I thought about resizing the photos and then I saw the quality of all of them and all of them were bad......so I opted out for the bigger size :blush:

Next time, I will resize the post :wink: !!

I*m glad that everybody is enjoying it though!!!!:heart: ^_^
I love them biger so thanks!:flower:
 
kimair said:
so true...
it kills me how many great actresses there are out there that have never had a vogue cover...
and someone like kate hudson has 3
(or that britney spears has one!)
Yes its stupid really,i mean not just actresses there are a lot of other people who have greatr style and would be perfect for the cover.Why all the same people?:blush: Its boring and i think Britneys cover was a peek of the lowdown,that is the worst Vogue cover ever in my opinion!:woot:
 
^I had no idea Britney had a Vogue cover!!! How awful!! But I'm curious to see it now :wink:
 
L.A.Gant said:
^I had no idea Britney had a Vogue cover!!! How awful!! But I'm curious to see it now :wink:
Well here it is.I think Britney dosent look so bad i have seen her worse but i just hate this cover its so tacky!
Credit.eBay!
c5_1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL!! Thanks Emil. You are right she does look quite good there, better than recently. But ya, not an appropriate Vogue cover at all.
 
That Britney cover is beyond tacky if you consider it was the first issue to come out after 9/11, that's why Anna put the flag behind her instead of just pulling the entire thing.
 
That Britney Vogue was the first Vogue I ever bought and it was because she was on the cover and ever since I've been hooked....but my interest has declined over the years. So I can see why they put her or other celebs on the cover. It draws in and then potentially hooks new readers.
 
for me, putting Gwen on a Vogue cover back in 2004 was Anna's WORST choice ever, even worse than Britney. i never really got over that, it was the only issue ever i did not buy (and i have not missed a single one since i was 16). Britney is just annoying, but Gwen is annoying AND tacky! that was enough.
 
I finally got this issue and I was not expecting too much from it and that's exactly what I got. It's OK and I guess it will do has I yet again anticipate next's month's issue hoping for something amazing. Vogue usually has a little gem in each of its issues but this one seems to have none. The Gisele edit is lovely but it looks like a continuation of the last month's edit but with different clothes (same studio background) and therefore boring to see again. The Kate edit is cute but that HAT in every picture has totally pissed me off. I can't even look at it without getting angry. In fact I hope that hideous Balenciaga hat focus dies by the end of the summer - there is too much of it. Finally, as much as I agree with the Stella dislike, I think her edit is the only exciting one of the magazine. But, that's just me - I love editorials in modern urban settings.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really like the pic but it really doesn't fit Kate personally style (I know it has to be different all the time but...) the two previous one she did (for Almost Famous and Raising Aunt Helen) were far better she really looked like the hippy girl I love now she looks like Jackie O !!
 
liberty33r1b said:
for me, putting Gwen on a Vogue cover back in 2004 was Anna's WORST choice ever, even worse than Britney. i never really got over that, it was the only issue ever i did not buy (and i have not missed a single one since i was 16). Britney is just annoying, but Gwen is annoying AND tacky! that was enough.
OMG Really?:woot: :lol: I love the Gwen cover and her spread was amazing its one of my favourite covers/issues.I think Gwen was amazing in the pictures its maybe because i dont find her attrocious as Britney oh well it shows how different we all are and that is a good thing!:lol:
 
L.A. Gant, can you please scan the whole Gisele's ed and also Stella's ed? I hope I'm not asking too much! Sorry if I am!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,468
Messages
15,186,172
Members
86,344
Latest member
zemi
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->