MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.
This meme via Instagram couldn’t be more appropriate:
Well, she’s about as exciting as a blank white page so it required the same amount of effort.Looks at newsstand: Blank white Covid 19 cover or Kendall?!
Picks blank cover*
Kendall is a beautiful girl but she is not a model.
I would disagree. IMO, it seems as though she's merely operating in a world that her mother set up for her. Kris birthed her into fame and as soon as she was of age, brands used her as ad revenue and publicity in exchange for an it girl lifestyle and a f*ck ton of money. You're giving her too much credit to say that any of this was her own doing. And it's hard for me to applaud this business model because a) it's incredibly lazy and unoriginal, and b) it makes the demise of the fashion industry soooo disheartening and frustrating.she is doing excellently what she is being (veeeeery highly) paid for - I have to give it to her!
But Binx is always doing nothing. Her print work is really weak. I am tired of the bored eyes and ironic smirk. I find Kendall much more versatile. She is at least trying (sometimes)This is a testament to the ones that criticizes Binx. Here you see that standing there and doing absolutely nothing is not that easy lol
^oops my bad. I hope she wont be mad
(I have fixed the typos)
^ I mean, unlike the Binx Kendall can be shown in different settings. Looking at the editorials in which she appeared you can see that she fits both commercial and avant-garde work. Well, whether she fits or not is subjective but in my opinion she does. Binx only looks good when portrayed in a more "casual" version. I don't see her in a makeup ad or a haute couture editorial.
I'm talking more about the look rather than the modeling skills which in both cases are weak.
Hope you understand me because I didnt know how to explain what I meant.