A Materialistic Society?

faust said:
good job dodging :rolleyes: .

i can tell you what i'm doing. i'm not playing a revolutionary. i am not pointing fingers and beating my chest in indignation while not doing anything about changing it.

why was i expecting this response? :innocent: and i don't know what that means i'm sorry. i probably am not doing very much like most of us. i am still learning about things, that is positive. it was an honest question i posed to you, and you also evaded it. but yes, i was ticked off by your attitude. both paulw and i, for instance, are obviously learning and the most constructive thing to do is not to jump down people's throats if you feel you are more informed than them, no?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
meme527 said:
wow, faust, why so aggressive?:unsure:

why? because i am sick of all these pseudo-revolutionaries in their Che Guevarra t-shirts, safe under their mommy-daddy wings, who can yell all they want because it's fashionable. because i'm tired of all these williamsburg "bohemians" trying to look oh-so-poor in their $200 Rogan jeans. because i'm tired of all this fake BS of these little kids that are just utterly bored and want to play rebels. they know it's just a game on the way to prosperity. they have perverted the last bit of purity that rebellion has ever stood for and made a cut thing to do, along with a big industry to cater to them.
 
faust said:
why? because i am sick of all these pseudo-revolutionaries in their Che Guevarra t-shirts, safe under their mommy-daddy wings, who can yell all they want because it's fashionable. because i'm tired of all these williamsburg "bohemians" trying to look oh-so-poor in their $200 Rogan jeans. because i'm tired of all this fake BS of these little kids that are just utterly bored and want to play rebels. they know it's just a game on the way to prosperity. they have perverted the last bit of purity that rebellion has ever stood for and made a cut thing to do, along with a big industry to cater to them.

well, i guess this is a safe enough place to vent your anger. i suppose you must just be asking for a sympathetic ear?:huh:

but i know i don't fit into the category of people you are so angry about, so until you have something constructive to say, i'll just assume your diatribe is meant as a kind of general, helpless lament against the state of things.....
 
i think it's presumptious to assume i am one of those who you speak about. my 'liberal' friends are hardly living it up in williamsburg! far from it! i agree, it is fine to vent, just don't take it out on me, please.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
faust said:
why? because i am sick of all these pseudo-revolutionaries in their Che Guevarra t-shirts, safe under their mommy-daddy wings, who can yell all they want because it's fashionable. because i'm tired of all these williamsburg "bohemians" trying to look oh-so-poor in their $200 Rogan jeans. because i'm tired of all this fake BS of these little kids that are just utterly bored and want to play rebels. they know it's just a game on the way to prosperity. they have perverted the last bit of purity that rebellion has ever stood for and made a cut thing to do, along with a big industry to cater to them.

Faust :flower:

I can see where you're coming from , and in my own somewhat pathetic way , I feel the same .

Please DON'T think that I am being patronising when I say that your background has formed you and given you a healthy respect for a totally honest approach to your life . You live in a country that you have chosen , and I feel that despite its shortcomings , you value the freedom that being a citizen of the USA gives you .
What I think you detect in others as being bogus or a covenient ' political pose ' is actually , in many cases , a young person reaching for an ethical way of life , but is far too attracted to the trappings of rebellion and protest , to the extent that they cannot see the wood for the trees .
In my rather cynical post this afternoon I voiced my own disgust at the political spin on debt relief that European politicians have seized upon to divert attention from the European Constitution ballsup that's been waiting to fall onto us for some time .
I am utterly sick of the great unwashed ' Sir Bob Geldof ' jumping on the bandwagon , along with all the other has-beens , like Midge Ure , who glimpse the chance of another 10 minutes of fame . Where are the African artists in this age-defining event ? ( i suppose we could even venture the phrase , which I have patented by the way , as ' this zeitgeist defining event ' . Some are now included in subsequent concerts as an afterthought , while ebay sells tickets for the concerts at grossly inflated prices to line the pockets of the wideboys , to whom Africans are barely civilised ' natives ' to be exploited for as much profit as can be squeezed out of the cynically acquired ' premium ' tickets .
Bliar and Geldof deserve each other , but the poor in Africa deserve so much more , which will not be forthcoming when all is added up and the political spinmerchants have moved on to the next big thing , such as another high-level project to wipe out AIDS in Asia , which is now becoming the workshop of the world . Or Bush and the neocons will decide that a war in Iran/ North Vietnam / or any other chosen member of the axis of evil will be a suitable diversion to direct attention away from the disappearance of people's savings and pensions into the vast maw that is Wall Street , The City in London , or the bourse in Frankfurt .

I am actually very surprised that this thread has yielded so much serious thought , when I expected a rather superficial catalogue of breastbeating that merely allows the contributors to define their own defination of their ' conscience ' and then move on to the latest news from WWD with their guilt salved and the next trip to that luxury boutique amply justified by their crocodile tears .

From my ' vast ' experience of the young , it's the process that youth goes through in order to form their own true opinions , a rite of passage , so to speak , and although most will fall by the wayside and adopt the ' conservative ' life of the middle-class ' burbs ' , more than just a few will keep the fire of a realistic truth burning , and will even meet up with like-minded people when they venture out of the consumer cacoon that is SO easy to accept as the only way to eat , bring up a family and derive SOMETHING to justify their existance in this vale of sorrow .

I began as a left-wing socialist , visited Russia , Latvia , Estonia and East Germany in the days of the 70s , after perastroika . I was appalled by the blatent privilege enjoyed by the chosen party members , my phone was tapped for 6 months after my return to the UK to establish whether I was a danger to the capitalist system of the West , and I consequently emerged as a rather less idealistic left-winger , but a much more canny socialist than I had been before the political scales fell from my eyes after my second visit to Russia and the Baltic states at the end of the 70s .

Incidentally the love of designer clothes is common to all - as I was followed everywhere in Moscow , Riga , Tallinn , and St. Petersburg by young gentlemen offering to buy my YSL Safari suit and my up-to-the-minute New-Man French sportswear . I felt so guilty to the extent that I could take such items for granted , whereas those youngsters had probably poured over Western magazines , wanting against hope that one day such sartorial richesse would come their way .

You're very intense at the moment , and I myself am so , though I think for much different reasons .
Let's lighten up and live and let live . Elitny Muscovites are draped in Versace , YSL , Armani and all the labels they could wish for . Let's hope that Reagon's economic trickle-down effect will happen ( I can hear your hollow laugh from here and it's the absolute still of the night ) and that the comforting effects of some luxury in everyones' lives will allow a legitimate and honest reaching out from the the second world to the third world that will actually happen .

It's actually ' cut the crap time ' for us ALL if we did but know it .

Please excuse my presumption , Faust , if I've taken liberties , I'm just reaching out to a fellow believer who hopes to reach the final goal by a slightly different route .
 
spoken like a true sage that you are, kit :flower:. i'm glad that you were able to shed your left-wing fascination, as many of those who visited the socialist countries and saw their reality have, without losing your sense of socialist and humanitarian face. it's a fine and a right balance to strike.
 
whats the problem faust?
can we PLEASE keep it civil here?
this is no angst column or your own back yard

please try to stay on topic and post in respect of tFS forums
 
What's the problem, Lena? Read the post below, that's where the problem started. If that was not a totally unfounded, yet a personal attack on me, I don't know what is. And don't tell me that it was just a coincidence, or that I am overreacting. This boy obviously think that buying expensive clothes = materialism, and he is singling me out (because I don't know another person on tFS besides Alex that champions both Ann and CCP, yet knows the line between beauty and materialism).

No, this isn't my own back yard. This is a public forum, on which I am allowed to express my opinion. Just because I choose to challenge people in the open, unlike the hinting post below, doesn't make me any ruder then them.

Paullw said:
Materialism and consumerism runs through all parts of society. We now even have cosumerism where people pretend that they aren't materialistic, because they are anti-label or whatever. Someone here buying Ann Dem or CCP is just as bad as those people mocked in the Nouveau Riche thread for buying LV monograms in crazy colours. The friends of either of these people will approve and compliment them. The buyers will feel good, in both the compliments, and that they like the way they dress.

There's even some argument (I'm not saying its a good one though...) that if someone buys a fake LV its better than buying CCP. At least they aren't putting such a huge amount of money into something so materialistic, and generally the vendor is going to be a poor market salesman, and its going to be made in a poorer Asian economy (where the people, do actually welcome even sweatshop labour, its better than nothing after all!), so it benefits the poor. Whereas buying the CCP/Ann Dem benefits a big department store thats already hugely rich, and the rest of the money goes to some Belgian who's poofing around all day making up new words to describe just how pretentious he is. :innocent:
 
faust said:
What's the problem, Lena? Read the post below, that's where the problem started. If that was not a totally unfounded, yet a personal attack on me, I don't know what is. And don't tell me that it was just a coincidence, or that I am overreacting. This boy obviously think that buying expensive clothes = materialism, and he is singling me out (because I don't know another person on tFS besides Alex that champions both Ann and CCP, yet knows the line between beauty and materialism).

No, this isn't my own back yard. This is a public forum, on which I am allowed to express my opinion. Just because I choose to challenge people in the open, unlike the hinting post below, doesn't make me any ruder then them.

Firstly that wasn't aimed at you, there are other people on this forum who champion those brands. They were also the first that came to mind in terms of the whole 'arte povera' movement. However the anti-label trend can also be attributed to hundreds of other people and brands, take the whole Boho/Bobo chic trends and the 'hipsters'.

Secondly its only an attack on anyone if you perceive that its bad to be equal to other humans. I was only saying that people who buy clothes for beauty, do so because they get pleasure from beauty. People who buy clothes because other people have them, get pleasure from being popular, and fitting in. However, I'm sorry if you felt it was aimed at you.

As for people needing to do something about poverty, this is an academic discussion about whether society is materialistic, people are putting forward their opinions. I grew up in Africa, so its something I feel strongly about.

As for what I do to help: I volunteer in Oxfam at weekends, I'm also a charity rep at school, and I have helped to set up a sponsored walk, raising £9000. We have also organised for our school to be twinned with one in Uganda, so we have had collections for them to help them build new classrooms. I have also convinced the school to ship over our old equipment, so they now have textbooks, blackboards, and 30 computers, as well as the facilities to use them. I have also cycled 200 miles round Holland, raising £1000 and next year I am going to Africa to help with engineering projects to provide clean water to rural villages.

Now am I allowed an opinion?
 
OFF TOPIC: my dear faust, everyone is allowed to their opinion but venting for venting's sake is not very constructive... try to find other ways to take out/express your anger, we are trying to make a discussion here, this is no angst corner ok? :wink:

faust said:
(because I don't know another person on tFS besides Alex that champions both Ann and CCP, yet knows the line between beauty and materialism).
i think you are exaggerating here, check the Ann and CCP threads to make sure that you are not the only person 'championing' those designers, i'm sure the poster wasnt even aware of your 'personal taste' so please be more reasonable and dont jump on conclusions next time...

lets go on with the discussion in a more civilised manner,
we have nothing to argue for, we are JUST exchanging views here and this must be done in the most civil way...
appreciated :flower:
 
you've been always allowed your opinion paullW just try to be more polite and considerate of other members opinions ... if thats not a major problem

a calmer more polite/civilised attitute takes us all a long way :wink: :flower:
 
I don't even see the connection between Ann Dem and CCp in contrast to each other and this discussion, or did I miss something? :confused:
 
Lena said:
you've been always allowed your opinion paullW just try to be more polite and considerate of other members opinions ... if thats not a major problem

a calmer more polite/civilised attitute takes us all a long way :wink: :flower:

I am sorry if I've offended people :flower: , because that hasn't been the intention at all. I have tried to represent my viewpoint fairly, but there have been a few occasions on which people have misunderstood what I've been trying to explain, so I'll try and be clearer in future.
 
i didn't perceive any personal attacks at all - paullw, you have nothing to apologize for! i have appreciated your comments and don't see how you could have done any more to avoid offending someone. so don't take anything personally.

so far, except for the strange turn things havetaken at the last minute, this has been a great thread.

meme
 
i feel like i have to defend us 'youngesters' ( i'm only 6 years younger than you faust)
it was the students, children of the wealthy elite, similar to and also including the breed you find in williamsburg, that really championed major movements like the anti-apartheid, anti-sweatshop, anti-globalization etc. they have expensive educations, but they also have the opportunity to do something about it. most of my 'boho/ hipster' looking friends are actually poor -- they aren't trying to be fashionable! infact, most of the young people i know are very active, civil minded people. most of them try to bike or use public transport, they have very little possessions -- and they actually know what they are yelling about when they attend political rallys. rebellion isn't a bad thing, they are rebelling against getting sucked into an empty, apathetic life.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
travolta said:
i feel like i have to defend us 'youngesters' ( i'm only 6 years younger than you faust)
it was the students, children of the wealthy elite, similar to and also including the breed you find in williamsburg, that really championed major movements like the anti-apartheid, anti-sweatshop, anti-globalization etc. they have expensive educations, but they also have the opportunity to do something about it. most of my 'boho/ hipster' looking friends are actually poor -- they aren't trying to be fashionable! infact, most of the young people i know are very active, civil minded people. most of them try to bike or use public transport, they have very little possessions -- and they actually know what they are yelling about when they attend political rallys. rebellion isn't a bad thing, they are rebelling against getting sucked into an empty, apathetic life.


Read "The Darling" by Russell Banks, if you get a chance. You will see where I'm coming from - I'll go no further with this argument.

Paul - you equated buying material things (or to be more precise expensive clothing) with materliasm. This is like saying that all Jews are cheap. Let's just get this definition right, once and for all, and then maybe we can start this discussion again in a healthy manner.

From Merriam-Webster;

"materialism - a preoccupation with or stress upon material rather than intellectual or spiritual things."

Not the emphasis on RATHER. It doesn't say that one excludes the other. So, let's just make this difference clear - a bimbo that raids the mall on daily basis just because she can find nothing better to do, does not equal a person who buys clothes because he/she can see and appreciate the beauty of it (as well as he/she can appreciate beauty in other things). I felt insulted, and I'm not the only one who did, because you clearly made that equation.
 
I never said that the person buying LV because its LV would be shopping because she has nothing else to do. Maybe they also lead an interesting and spiritual life.

My point was just that I don't think buying one type of designer clothing is any better than another type. Nor is it better or worse than spending your money on computers, or cars, or mountain bikes, or whatever else people chose to buy. I buy designer clothes when I can. I am sorry that you felt insulted though.

There are lots of definitions of materialism, they all vary. I've already quoted some. We live in society where, in general, people buy more than they need. We get this lifestyle at the expense of others, I would say that that constitutes materialism, but however you describe it, there is still a problem.
 
Paullw said:
I never said that the person buying LV because its LV would be shopping because she has nothing else to do. Maybe they also lead an interesting and spiritual life.

My point was just that I don't think buying one type of designer clothing is any better than another type. Nor is it better or worse than spending your money on computers, or cars, or mountain bikes, or whatever else people chose to buy. I buy designer clothes when I can. I am sorry that you felt insulted though.

There are lots of definitions of materialism, they all vary. I've already quoted some. We live in society where, in general, people buy more than they need. We get this lifestyle at the expense of others, I would say that that constitutes materialism, but however you describe it, there is still a problem.

Paul, I only felt insulted because you lumped (or at least it seemed so to me) together the reasons for buying the material things. hey, in my book if a person buys LV because they feel aesthetically connected and spiritually gratified, more power to them. it's usually not the case, though. Anyway, it seems like we sorted this thing out. :flower:
 
Speaking of materialism, I saw two things recently which literally nauseated me. Which could possibly be worse:

1) the poor black girl (whom I spotted on the street in Bushwick/Bed-Stuy) with a t-shirt which read "If You're Rich, I'm Your b*tch";

or

2) The waspy white woman dressed in head to toe Chanel (whom I spotted shopping in the Madison Avenue Chanel boutique)-- who had a Chanel logo tatooed in blue ink on her ankle?

Barf.

Materialism and "the high life" isn't all it's cracked up to be. When I first moved to Manhattan, I went on my share of $500 dinner dates with multimillionaire investment bankers and real estate bigwheels.... untill I realized that I'd be much happier eating a burger at Big Nicks by myself while re-reading JK Huysmans than wasting one more second of my life dining at Masa, Cafe des Artistes, etc. at the expense of having to put up with some utterly boring insecure pompous windbag trying brag his way into my pants who's bothering mainly because he thinks I'd look good on his arm at charity events. (You'd be surprised how often that came up.)Thank God I always had the integrity to turn down second dates. Bah, humbug to all that! Here's to pride and independence.

I refuse to wear logos in any way shape or form and don't care about trends per se...but am just as guilty about insisting on absolutely beautiful, well-made clothes as anyone-- probably even more so. Even if I do buy second-hand Herrera and Louboutins at the consignment store for a miniscule fraction of the price, I'm still guilty of being a "quality snob". Clothes are by no means the most important thing in my life, but it is a form of materialism all the same.

You're right, a lot of concern with clothes has to do with defining our selves within a social context. When I was working at a think tank as a research analyst and working on my PhD, I hardly devoted any time to clothes at all-- why should I, if I spent my nights studying at the office more often than not? A black turtleneck would do. But when I became a freelancer and moved to Manhattan, I really put a lot of effort into noticing what the extremely elegant women I was volunteering with at the charity events found to be "first rate". What Would Carroll Petrie Wear? LOL!

At least now, before I buy anything at all-- even at the consignment store-- I ask myself two questions: is this the way you want to look (in a particular social context) to the point that you'd prefer it over any other possible look you have ready in your closet now? Is it significantly more well-made than something you already own to the point that the expense justifies replacing it with the higher-quality item? If the answer is no, I simply don't buy it.

All my clothes fit in one small closet, but I always manage to look polished and very well put-together with what I do have. Always remember, the best clothes in the world will never hide or mask what kind of a head you have sticking out of the top of them.
 
frugalsquirrel said:
Speaking of materialism, I saw two things recently which literally nauseated me. Which could possibly be worse:

1) the poor black girl (whom I spotted on the street in Bushwick/Bed-Stuy) with a t-shirt which read "If You're Rich, I'm Your b*tch";

or

2) The waspy white woman dressed in head to toe Chanel (whom I spotted shopping in the Madison Avenue Chanel boutique)-- who had a Chanel logo tatooed in blue ink on her ankle?

Barf.

Materialism and "the high life" isn't all it's cracked up to be. When I first moved to Manhattan, I went on my share of $500 dinner dates with multimillionaire investment bankers and real estate bigwheels.... untill I realized that I'd be much happier eating a burger at Big Nicks by myself while re-reading JK Huysmans than wasting one more second of my life dining at Masa, Cafe des Artistes, etc. at the expense of having to put up with some utterly boring insecure pompous windbag trying brag his way into my pants who's bothering mainly because he thinks I'd look good on his arm at charity events. (You'd be surprised how often that came up.)Thank God I always had the integrity to turn down second dates. Bah, humbug to all that! Here's to pride and independence.

I refuse to wear logos in any way shape or form and don't care about trends per se...but am just as guilty about insisting on absolutely beautiful, well-made clothes as anyone-- probably even more so. Even if I do buy second-hand Herrera and Louboutins at the consignment store for a miniscule fraction of the price, I'm still guilty of being a "quality snob". Clothes are by no means the most important thing in my life, but it is a form of materialism all the same.

You're right, a lot of concern with clothes has to do with defining our selves within a social context. When I was working at a think tank as a research analyst and working on my PhD, I hardly devoted any time to clothes at all-- why should I, if I spent my nights studying at the office more often than not? A black turtleneck would do. But when I became a freelancer and moved to Manhattan, I really put a lot of effort into noticing what the extremely elegant women I was volunteering with at the charity events found to be "first rate". What Would Carroll Petrie Wear? LOL!

At least now, before I buy anything at all-- even at the consignment store-- I ask myself two questions: is this the way you want to look (in a particular social context) to the point that you'd prefer it over any other possible look you have ready in your closet now? Is it significantly more well-made than something you already own to the point that the expense justifies replacing it with the higher-quality item? If the answer is no, I simply don't buy it.

All my clothes fit in one small closet, but I always manage to look polished and very well put-together with what I do have. Always remember, the best clothes in the world will never hide or mask what kind of a head you have sticking out of the top of them.

AS well put as anything Naomi Klein has to say in ' No Logo ' .

I really do not think that ANYONE who has engaged in this discussion could find ANYTHING with which to disagree in what you have to say here . :flower:

AND it comes from the Manhattan coalface , so to speak .

Welcome to TFS , frugalsquirrel . Your contribution is much appreciated . :clap:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,542
Messages
15,188,553
Members
86,436
Latest member
alanismichelle
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->