It would be exaggerating to call it definitively ugly—though a pair of giant overalls and saggy-backed, folded-front turn-up pants were close calls.



she designs everything else, so why not chloe

peacelover142002 said:I agree that style.com was way too harsh. I've never been a fan of Chloe, but last season was really good, and for some reason, I like this one even better. I have no idea why, though.![]()
![]()
![]()
i could not agree more...brian said:to me, the shoes convey a sentiment of a hidden, naïve, perversion... the covered platform makes it look as if it's not even there, and gives the illusion that the foot is arched in a super-high angle.... fetishistic... yet, the shoe is quite sweet and not something you would 'typically' think of as being erotic or sexy at all... they're very poetic to me in a way....![]()


I found this fabulous site while googling "how to pronounce Louboutin" and am I so glad I came acrosss this little gem of a knowledge base! I see an abundance of fashionistas on here so can one of you give me the pho-net-ic-al please.. And if you happend to know where I can scoop up a pair of black patent stacked or cork bruges this late in the game it would be much appreciated 