I am one of those who made the "looks like an editorial" comment and I thought
I explained myself, but I will elaborate further. To me, an editorial is about a theme or a story and if a fashion editorial is done properly, the clothes should be one of the main characters. A pop culture analogy would be shows like
Mad Men and
Sex and the City where fashion plays a role in defining the characters and the storytelling.
An ad campaign is about the product - the clothes, handbags, cosmetics, etc., and / or the brand image - strong women, sophisticated women, adventurers, sexy young things, etc. If you are the target, an ad campaign should first make enough of an impression that you will stop flipping through the magazine to look at the picture and then leave you wanting that dress or one of its runway sisters OR convey to you that the brand fits your sophisticated or sexy personality. Note that proxying can go on, in other words I do not fit into the adventurers category but I know it when I see it. BTW, I would not rule out photos that tell a story or represent a theme working as a campaign, but it has to make a strong enough impression to at least solidify the brand in the viewers' consciousness.
IMO, these pictures fit into the storytelling / theme motif of an ed, but does not succeed in the clothes being one of the main characters or even at being a compelling story and that is why it does not get a thumbs up from me. Now reading some of the other comments, the pictures and clothes are making an impression on other posters, so maybe it resonates with some people.
P.S.
There are editorials that are mostly about the clothes themselves and do not have a theme or tell a story - the U.S. Vogue jumping girl eds that we like to snark about are an example.
Look at the first picture: She looks like a mix of Sasha and Maryna!
LOL, I caught the Maryna resemblance too.