Creative
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2007
- Messages
- 5,117
- Reaction score
- 2,751
Indeed! This year has been Galliano’s comeback for sure. But it’s a comeback like Tom Ford’s. He is back in the fashion conversation, but we talk more about his glory days, we admire his previous work, we talk about the genius he was… It has to do more with remembering the past and with the nostalgia than about the fact that he might be doing something that has l’air du temps and that is at his peak of brilliance. In fact, for me his Margiela is all “reprints” of his previous work, which is fair and ok, but I’m not gonna see a Margiela show as excited as I saw his pre2008 Dior shows.But in the particular case of John Galliano that is simply untrue, no? Especially this year. People talked about that show for weeks, they still do. We all do, look at us! Debating about this man for months and months on end. He will never not be relevant to the fashion conversation.
It’s a little bit like the late YSL shows from the 90s and 00s. Now we see them and we admire them, and there’s something I truly like now that couldn’t appreciate back in 2002. But they were the last irrelevant phase of a genius. Even if I like them now, even if I find super charming how demodé , how personal and impossible to imitate they were, his peak and his glory days are not the 90s and the 00s.
In Galliano’s case, I think it’s more about giving him the place he deserves in fashion, smartly orchestrated by Anna, than people admiring his current work (which could also be the case for some), but I guess that if someone witnessed his 00s shows, what he is doing now tastes like Pepsi with a lot of water for someone who is used to drink Coke.