Kramer (Seinfeld) in racist video

SiennaInLondon said:
Erm I am not exactly sure what you are implying, but if you were implying that I was asking what cr***er was in order to make people type something that was offensive to black people even though I knew what is was, then I think you probably have an acute case of CHIP-SHOULDER syndrome. We all agree that this Seinfeld dude is racist, but try and get out of your geo-centric way of thinking and learn to accept that people outside of the States have not come across the same localised terms as you have. It's not racist but it certainly is narrow minded.

Sorry I was busy today so I wasn't able to be on here, first of all you don't know **** about me to say that Iam narrow minded or that I have a chip on my shoulder, second where in the hell did I say you were trying to make people type something offensive to black people? You must can't read because what I said was being as though the word "cracker" (please excuse me everyone) has been used thru out this thread and I was talking about what some black people who are very ignorant call caucasin people, I figured you were being funny, but if you were not and I took it wrong, than let me know I was wrong and what you were meaning to say before you even begin to tell me what mind Iam in, sometimes, since your so smart, when people type, its hard to know exactly how they are saying things because its being typed, so if I took something you said wrong then explain it to me
 
Last edited by a moderator:
high maintenance said:
when people type, its hard to know exactly how they are saying things because its being typed, so if I took something you said wrong then explain it to me

Calm down ladies and this is what I was talking about before. Peace..:flower:
 
I don't want to get too carried away on these topics either, but I just can't help myself. :blush:

eurofashionjunki said:
a Muslim leader says that women who dress too sexy deserve to be raped.

No one in the world deserves to be raped. It serves no useful purpose. r*pe is also more about power than sexuality.

I don't condone dressing provocatively, but that statement just makes my blood boil. r*pe is a horrible horrible thing. Dressing provocatively isn't a crime.

Also, "too sexy" is very relative. There are muslims who think that a woman letting her ankle show is enough to warrant a r*pe.


fashionicon said:
I'm so tired of the "I think people are hating on Janet because she was a black woman who had the nip slip." statement. It was more about sexism, it had nothing to do with her race. . . . Anytime a woman is seen as promiscuous, than it's a problem.

I definitely agree on the way women's sexuality is treated. But I also think there was another element in that whole thing that made it such a big deal.

Most people I heard from complaining about it were upset that they were hosting parties to watch the game, and there were so many kids in the room watching it. Parents just didn't expect for that to happen on a football game. Frankly I wouldn't want my kids to see that either. While I know sex is everywhere, I'd do anything to give them a more ideal view of sexuality than two pop singers getting together to objectify a woman's body onstage.

It wouldn't have even been a big deal if the superbowl weren't such a huge thing. You could put the same thing on any other show, and maybe not hear a peep. But it just such a massive amount of people watching and responding.

I'm not taking away from what you're saying at all. I'm always upset about how women's sexuality is viewed. I just think there's more to it in this particular instance.

I feel like I've gone off topic too much. :blush:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eurofashionjunki said:
he does have a point about women who dress like that attract dodgy men.

I totally missed this. I agree about dressing to attract certain people. I'm just not sure if that's how he meant it. Maybe I'm just paranoid, I've heard such extreme things. I assume he means he wants them to be raped. But I don't know.

Also sorry if I sound pushy at all. I always re-read my posts and I sound like a b*tch. :lol:
 
eurofashionjunki said:
Calm down ladies and this is what I was talking about before. Peace..:flower:

I sorry for getting angry, And for using foul language, got a little hot under the collar.:blush:
 
pavement said:
No one in the world deserves to be raped. It serves no useful purpose. r*pe is also more about power than sexuality.

I don't condone dressing provocatively, but that statement just makes my blood boil. r*pe is a horrible horrible thing. Dressing provocatively isn't a crime.

Also, "too sexy" is very relative. There are muslims who think that a woman letting her ankle show is enough to warrant a r*pe.

I definitely agree on the way women's sexuality is treated. But I also think there was another element in that whole thing that made it such a big deal.
I know, that is why I was disgusted by that Muslim leader's remark. I'm not saying that all Muslims are like that because I have a few Muslim friends that dress how they want. :blush:.

Women need to protect themselves when there are out in public e.g. walking on the street. There are too many weridos in this world. I'm not saying cover up entirely, but at least cover up your body parts. I have seen too many teenager girls out revealing their bras, parties, butts, boobs....
 
I loved your post Sienna, and that BNP thing was quite informative. :flower:

There is just one problem though.

SiennaInLondon said:
I don't ever buy Hilfiger (not that I would anyway eww) and I don't purchase anything by Lauryn Hill because racism against the whites is equally unacceptable. Which is not to say people don't change -they do -but I'd rather not support these people till I have evidence that they have changed.

these are urban legends, (which I heard too) but they are not fact.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/lauryn.htm

http://www.snopes.com/racial/business/hilfiger.asp

Just want to be sure that we are boycotting the right people or for the right reasons. :flower:
 
pavement said:
I totally missed this. I agree about dressing to attract certain people. I'm just not sure if that's how he meant it. Maybe I'm just paranoid, I've heard such extreme things. I assume he means he wants them to be raped. But I don't know.

Also sorry if I sound pushy at all. I always re-read my posts and I sound like a b*tch. :lol:

You are not a b*tch:lol:.

He probably meant that:cry:, but can anyone else see that women are just being viewed as sex objects? I know it has been a case before, but it has gotten really bad now. And get alot of celebrity women like being treated like that and the young ones copy them. Remember pink's video 'Stupid Girls'? I know Pink is a hypocrit, but it is just too much now....
 
SiennaInLondon said:
and I don't purchase anything by Lauryn Hill because racism against the whites is equally unacceptable.

Huh? Explain?:blink: . Not sure what the rest of the post has to do with anything either. No offenese or anything.
 
high maintenance said:
I sorry for getting angry, And for using foul language, got a little hot under the collar.:blush:
yes thanks- please keep it civil here...
losing one's temper is exactly what caused this drama in the firs tplace- and we see that nothing good comes of it...

*profanity is against our guidelines so i will have to edit your post now...
 
well it was a joke...i love that show...but i won't be watching seinfeld!

wait a minute...i don't watch tv.
 
Gypsy_Doll said:
Huh? Explain?:blink: . Not sure what the rest of the post has to do with anything either. No offenese or anything.

I never heard this rumor about Lauren Hill. Could someone elaborate?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,604
Messages
15,190,766
Members
86,510
Latest member
mehmettendik
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->