Megan Fox (All Megan Fox Gossip Here!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
She was fired because she was very critical of her director and this Hitler thing is used as a convenient excuse.
The Hitler thing wasn't 'used' as an excuse, it was a very valid ground for dismissal.
You do not compare your Jewish boss to Hitler, even in jest. Or if you do, you do not do so on the record in a printed interview, especially when you work in a image and communication-based industry like film-making. I doubt Michael's feelings were hurt (Spielberg obviously reacted more sanguinely than Bay did), but that doesn't make the remark less insensitive and idiotic.

Do I think Michael Bay is a misogynistic pig who is probably an horrible boss? Yes. Yet, that does not excuse in any way Megan's unprofessional and disrespectful attitude.
I am at loss at to why people are taking sides in this 'feud'. Both Bay and Megan acted appealingly, and I can't see how the behavior of Bay can be used to justify Megan's, or vice-versa.

People keep bringing up Angelina Jolie.
Well, let's do compare them where it matters, then: Jolie is the best paid and most powerful actress in Hollywood. She started at the bottom of the food chain, like Megan, staring in music videos, doing the 't*ts & ****' photoshoots and playing the 'girlfriend' in poor quality movies. Don't you think she hasn't met many directors who treated her with less than respect? Don't you think there are many men in Hollywood on whose grave she'll happily spit?
Yet, Angelia has steadily climbed the ladder of the Hollywood hierarchy because she is a professional, and doesn't wash her dirty linen in the public. She'll talk about her private life all you want but you won't find a quote of her trashing her colleagues or employers.
And this is why Megan will never have the career of Angelina.
 
^I agree for the most part, but no one is comparing their acting ability or star power, more how they have altered their looks over the years, but I agree about Angelina maintaining her dignity when it comes to being professional. Also I will never believe any star kid (whether it's Angelina, Kate Hudson or Rumur Willis) when they say they didn't have any doors open for them. Nepotism is rampant in Hollywood.
 
Oh My God! Yea, Megan made a mistake, but Transformers is just one movie! Why are some ppl sounding like it's the beginning and end of Megan? carmen_kass is right, nobody is comparing their star power or acting ability! Isn't Angelina like more than a decade older than Megan! Plus isn't it a bit early to say megan's never gonna get a career like angelina? I mean she might not but isn't it still a bit early to say such? For what it's worth, girl has 3 movies coming out!! I don't think all 3 movies are gonna tank!
Posted via Mobile Device
 
^I agree for the most part, but no one is comparing their acting ability or star power, more how they have altered their looks over the years.
I know. This is why I wrote: 'Let's compare them where it matters'.:flower:
 
Plus isn't it a bit early to say megan's never gonna get a career like angelina? I mean she might not but isn't it still a bit early to say such? For what it's worth, girl has 3 movies coming out!! I don't think all 3 movies are gonna tank!
Posted via Mobile Device

why? her last three movies did not do well. passion play went direct to video. jonah hex cost 47 million to make and only earned 10 million in america. jennifer's body's results were also disappointing.
 
Plus isn't it a bit early to say megan's never gonna get a career like angelina? I mean she might not but isn't it still a bit early to say such? For what it's worth, girl has 3 movies coming out!! I don't think all 3 movies are gonna tank!
Posted via Mobile Device
No, I don't think it's early. Yes, Angelina is older than Megan but Megan is 25 years old, by the time Angelina was 25 she had already won 3 Golden Globes, 2 SAG Awards and an Academy Award. Unless there are some drastic changes, Megan's career is not going in the same direction Angelina's career was going at the same age. That's not to say Megan's career is ending, I like Megan, I hope she does have good career.
 
^I don't like Megan but I also think she can still have a career, even though she'll never be A-list. There is work for girls like her in rom-coms or action movies, or in TV sitcoms. I think she can have Jessica Biel's career, something like that.
why? her last three movies did not do well. passion play went direct to video. jonah hex cost 47 million to make and only earned 10 million in america. jennifer's body's results were also disappointing.
Her next three movies are much smarter choices that the past ones.
She's doing small, supporting roles alongside respected, successful actors and directors. If these movies flop, it won't be her fault because she isn't the headliner, but if they succeed (and The Dictator is pretty much guarantied to be a hit), then it will look good on her resume.
 
why? her last three movies did not do well. passion play went direct to video. jonah hex cost 47 million to make and only earned 10 million in america. jennifer's body's results were also disappointing.

it doesn't make sense to imply that since her last 3 movies failed her next 3 movies are gonna fail too. Everyday's not sunday!!!
Posted via Mobile Device
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lol. Ppl are using the word NEVER a little too loosely! Transformers made megan A-List! And correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't rom-com and action the type of movies that take actors to higher levels these days?

Also, nobody said she'd be playing small roles in her up coming movies, they said she's gonna be playing supporting roles. And I think even though she isn't the main character of these movies, they're pretty much gonna use her name a lot when they're promoting them.

Plus lets not even for one second think that those Megan Movies tanked because of her presence in them. The movie, were just bad choices. I don't think Angelina would have made passion play a success
Posted via Mobile Device
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Hitler thing wasn't 'used' as an excuse, it was a very valid ground for dismissal.
You do not compare your Jewish boss to Hitler, even in jest. Or if you do, you do not do so on the record in a printed interview, especially when you work in a image and communication-based industry like film-making. I doubt Michael's feelings were hurt (Spielberg obviously reacted more sanguinely than Bay did), but that doesn't make the remark less insensitive and idiotic.

Do I think Michael Bay is a misogynistic pig who is probably an horrible boss? Yes. Yet, that does not excuse in any way Megan's unprofessional and disrespectful attitude.
I am at loss at to why people are taking sides in this 'feud'. Both Bay and Megan acted appealingly, and I can't see how the behavior of Bay can be used to justify Megan's, or vice-versa.

People keep bringing up Angelina Jolie.
Well, let's do compare them where it matters, then: Jolie is the best paid and most powerful actress in Hollywood. She started at the bottom of the food chain, like Megan, staring in music videos, doing the 't*ts & ****' photoshoots and playing the 'girlfriend' in poor quality movies. Don't you think she hasn't met many directors who treated her with less than respect? Don't you think there are many men in Hollywood on whose grave she'll happily spit?
Yet, Angelia has steadily climbed the ladder of the Hollywood hierarchy because she is a professional, and doesn't wash her dirty linen in the public. She'll talk about her private life all you want but you won't find a quote of her trashing her colleagues or employers.
And this is why Megan will never have the career of Angelina.

She would have been fired anyway, her dismissal of Bay was rather extraordinary even without the mention of he who must not be named.

I'm not sure why I'm even discussing this since Michael Bay has not been behind any movie worth watching...and I haven't been able to stand her movies either.
 
Transformers made megan A-List!

Huh? F-list, maybe D-list at best. She's nearly on par with Lohan as being an outcast.

She's really more of a pin-up girl than anything else now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^imo she´s difinitely A list, not based on talent or resume but on the fact that she´s known worldwide. She has instant name recognition...
 
^LOL. Calling her D-list just makes me speechless! I'm not surprised though, since some ppl still can't accept the fact that J Aniston is A-list
Posted via Mobile Device
 
But in Angelina's case, I saw a lot of BEFOREs and AFTERs with my own eyes like 4 years ago in a magazine!
Posted via Mobile Device

But comparing a 19 year old Angelina to a 30 year old Angelina is much different than comparing a 19 year old Megan to a 24 year old Megan. Your face doesn't naturally change so drastically in 5 years but 10 years maybe.

Oh My God! Yea, Megan made a mistake, but Transformers is just one movie! Why are some ppl sounding like it's the beginning and end of Megan?
Transformers made megan A-List!Posted via Mobile Device

Exactly! It's just one movie but it's the one that made her "A-List" so it's a big deal. What if Carrie Fisher left Star Wars? Think about it.
 
Career wise she's b/c+ territory. Press coverage wise she definitely A list and name recognition wise she's 100% A+ list.
 
She's definitely B, B- list. A list are only oscar winners and not many of them either.
 
^^ That's what I came back to say. Name recognition doesn't make you A-list. If so, Lohan would have her beat hands down, then Hilton.

A-list are the Hollywood Who's Who? The award nominees and winners. Those that regularly get invited to the director's and producer's parties and appear on the Red Carpet of the big events.

Fox is tabloid fodder.
 
I get ur point! But ones face doesn't change drastically, like that in both cases, whether it's 5 or 10 years. The only thing that changes ones face naturally is aging. Plus yeah, transformers made her A-list, her taking off is a big deal. But it's still one movie. And all i'm saying is I don't get why ppl make it sound like because she left transformers, her career is over
Posted via Mobile Device
 
But the whole A,B..F list is based on career. If it was based on regognition Paris Hilton would be A list. She's not and neither is Megan.
(Right now I could really use one of those memes that say ''Your Argument Is Invalid'' :D)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,549
Messages
15,188,665
Members
86,440
Latest member
Hannafransson
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->