Natasha looks AWFUL in that L'Oreal ad. Why bother pay her all the big money if you're going to make her look like a botoxed housewife? Do these companies honestly think their ads look good with that much photoshop?
I get that it's obviously photoshopped backgrounds, but I don't really see anything disastrous about them, other than the fact that they're photoshopped backgrounds...
That editorial is too bad for words...I just cant handle it. All the pictures are awful but some of them are worst than disaster (like the 5th and the 6th)
^ i don't think that there are many eds where a whole outdoor background was photoshoped into studio shots actually.. but that's not even a big deal, the thing is that it was awfully done! the perspectives don't even match, i mean all the models were shot with the camera right in front of them while the backgrounds were shot from higher or lower angles
imo the only pics that look decent and believable are the 11th (Karlie in Elie Saab) and the last one
^Yeah its really bad done and thats the problem.
Versace ad with Saskia and Roberto Cavalli with Gisele were also photoshoped but they look perfect.
They have to be done by someone who knows how to photographe. Someone who knows the light and how the photo is going to look afterwords. Not just a designer that thinks he can do that.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.