Photoshop disasters #2 (Major magazines and brands only)

Status
Not open for further replies.
L'Oreal usually delivers photoshop disasters :rolleyes: Poor Natasha...
 
Neiman Marcus The Art of Fashion F/W 2012: Iris Strubegger :unsure:


-tumblr/neimanmarcus
 
^I think the weird photoshop is done on purpose to make it look like a painting.
 
^yeah, also her right shoulder but it´s meant to look like that imo.
 
Natasha looks like Kristin Chenoweth in her ad which is not a bad thing but Chenoweth is older than her
 
Natasha looks AWFUL in that L'Oreal ad. Why bother pay her all the big money if you're going to make her look like a botoxed housewife? Do these companies honestly think their ads look good with that much photoshop?
 
I didn't even recognize Natasha. I thought it's some old actress.
 
Karl Lagerfeld's latest ed for Numéro.. they clearly shot the models in a studio and added the backgrounds later, what a joke!:sick:



relay via Mat Cyruss
 
I get that it's obviously photoshopped backgrounds, but I don't really see anything disastrous about them, other than the fact that they're photoshopped backgrounds...
 
That editorial is too bad for words...I just cant handle it. All the pictures are awful but some of them are worst than disaster (like the 5th and the 6th)
 
It's obvious that the background is photoshopped, but the same can be said for most eds like that. I don't think it's a disaster at all.
 
^ i don't think that there are many eds where a whole outdoor background was photoshoped into studio shots actually.. but that's not even a big deal, the thing is that it was awfully done! the perspectives don't even match, i mean all the models were shot with the camera right in front of them while the backgrounds were shot from higher or lower angles :doh:
imo the only pics that look decent and believable are the 11th (Karlie in Elie Saab) and the last one
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^Yeah its really bad done and thats the problem.
Versace ad with Saskia and Roberto Cavalli with Gisele were also photoshoped but they look perfect.
They have to be done by someone who knows how to photographe. Someone who knows the light and how the photo is going to look afterwords. Not just a designer that thinks he can do that.
 
Miranda Kerr by Orlando Bloom for The NY Times T Magazine

where is the other leg??:o:lol:
19well_kerr_custom3_700x933.jpg

models
 
^she clearly has a very thin calve that is behind the front leg, can´t you see it? :lol:
 
You can see a little of her other leg but it was obvious cropped at the front
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,762
Messages
15,198,399
Members
86,758
Latest member
HoreaM
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->