Announcing... The 2nd Annual theFashionSpot Awards. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 27/12/2024 EOD!
I don't hate it and I don't love it, but I am head over heels for those white crumpled cotton numbers...they remind me of an agressively hot wedding night or a runaway bride ending up getting boozed at some truckstop. Very erotic...Her shows have always had some ammount of perversion or eroticism but mostly it's subtle or almost invisible. With last season being an introduction to a less subtle eroticism, this is pretty much in your face, but still under control and not over the top. Nice direction, I think....
In a way, Miuccia strikes me as the type of creative person who would rather have people hate what she does than just "like" it, you know? She seems like the type who wants to elicit a strong reaction one way or another, rather than just doing something nice and pleasant.
i feel the same way Mr-Dale, and i agree with Spike413, although i must admit this collection wasn't a love at first sight like other recent ones. i don't like most of the prints, except the snakeskin, and i'm not sure about the gold, but i love the see-trough pieces and some looks like the one on hanne gaby odiele. the shoes and the bags are very nice too. it's just really interesting, i'm not going crazy about it like i ususally do but i'm gonna look at it again and again.I can't fault it for that though, because it's really stuff that she always comes back to, after all of the fairies, feathers and faux fur, she always ends up going back to the whole proper and ladylike/sexually frustrated and oddball dichotomy with weird fabrications and frumpy proportions. That's the real Prada.
I liked ss08 too, and I couldn't really like this one, but you just described a reason I cant get it, its like these clothes are so all over the place, I don't get it.this is boring her s/s 2008 was awesome this looks like a skanky mom who went to copacabana in 1947 .
And that's exactly why I LOVE it!this looks like a skanky mom who went to copacabana in 1947 .
Oh, the fashion flip-flop, and we don't mean shower shoes. "The idea was to move away from all the fussy, couture-derived fashion that I think has become too heavy and overexploited," Muccia Prada said, with near disdain, before her show. Explioted? Wasn't Prada herself fall's primary proponent of haute-y chic, with those glorious laces worked into chichi power clothes?
Nevertheless, for spring Prada went, in her words, primitive and archaic yet sophisticated. And if the result didnt rise to the level of her most stunning collections, it offered ample evidence of her ongoing mastery of the finely honed idea. She started with a retro sexy secretary silhouette cut from structured, well-rumpled fabrics (a cotton-metal weave) and added lots of beribboned drawstring parachute action. It looked as if the "Mad Men" gals were getting a little something on the side from Mad Max (and maybe Ton Sur Ton). Thus, lady suits were de-ladified, bras exposed, fanny wraps tied on, while a picnic twinset got cropped to naughty heights over a thigh-baring, bunched-up fish-print skirt. And Prada gave a new wrinkle (make that wrinkles) to the endless dress craze in terrific casual shifts cut asymmetrically to slip off the shoulder or draw attention to one breast.
As for the accessories, it was all about the shoes, and not in a good way. The mile-high platforms strapped on over what appeared to be Prada's take on Peds might have been impressive, had half of the girls not had major trouble walking and thus looked absolutely petrified. At least one fell (the meandering stage set didnt allow for full viewing), and one bailed on the finale. Folks, more sculptural, higher, chunkier, clunkier, strappier, bondage-ier - we get it. But maybe it's time to cry uncle and downgrade to shoes that function a shoes, even on the runway. First, that oh-God-I'm-a-mom-dont-let-the-poor-girl-fall anxiety becomes a huge distraction for the audience. Second, a fashion show is still supposed to have some commercial tie-in, however abstract or theoretical. What does it say if the girls paid to walk in the shoes can't walk in the shoes?