Riccardo Tisci - Designer

Not a good fit for the brand, at all.

But I'm curious to see what the brand is going to look like under tisci.
I think Burberry will limite him. He's so creative and capable of so much. I love his couture designs.

Also, why leave Givenchy to join Burberry? Makes no sense to me, at all.

Givenchy might appear like more prestigious but Burberry is a bigger brand. Riccardo made Givenchy into the powerhouse it is today but let's not forget that between the last collection of Mr De Givenchy and the first collection of Riccardo, it was really a struggling sleeping beauty.

And Burberry has plans to go really into the luxury market. I wonder how it will translate IRL.
 
I think he was just fine @ Givenchy. I don't get the point of the transition. That's all.

He would be better @ Celine or Lanvin, imo.

But I'm happy to see him back and pretty excited.
 
I think he was just fine @ Givenchy. I don't get the point of the transition. That's all.

He would be better @ Celine or Lanvin, imo.

But I'm happy to see him back and pretty excited.

Now that you say it, I do agree that Hedi @ Burberry and Tisci @ Celine would be a better fit.

Tisci can do minimal-chic easily (although he sure would have to tone down a bit on the gothic witch) and Hedi's "rock-punk" vibe would fit the "too-British-to-care" aesthetic of Burberry like a glove (now that Westwood lost it).
 
How random! It's just like Heidi at Céline, I didn't expect it and I don't agree with it either. However unlike Céline, we all know of Burberry is a struggling brand and this almost feels like a desperate plea to save them. Tisci has the right connections and this move will definitely shake up the brand.

I really don't know what to expect. My only concern is that I hope he doesn't destroy the iconic British image and heritage of the house.
 
Bailey's been feeding Burberry with a British sensibility for so long that it's impossible for me to imagine any other direction. And this is where I really question whether Tisci is up to the task. What does he know about the brand or the audience which he just inherited? The British posh set don't run around in gothic gowns and streetwear. They already have the cream of the crop to choose from during LFW. I'd have much rather preferred Phoebe!

And Lola, I will add that many may not associate Burberry with luxury but Bailey have tried to introduce his consumers with niche demi-couture pieces over the years. It wasn't successful because it got derided (prime example was the peacock feather trench.) This won't work if Tisci will to go at it full-on because the British are not purveyors of luxury in the literal sense. It's considered vulgar. Besides, those who prefer that kind of thing can go to Paris or Italy.
 
This is exciting news, Tisci made Givenchy dark and glamorous, Burberry still doesn't have anything particularly interesting about it apart from trench coats and those feather dresses from a decade ago, let's hope he gives it some new life.
 
What the heck, what are they thinking?! Can't imagine any good coming out of this. He wasn't very interesting anymore at Givenchy, I expect the same here.
 
Bailey's been feeding Burberry with a British sensibility for so long that it's impossible for me to imagine any other direction. And this is where I really question whether Tisci is up to the task. What does he know about the brand or the audience which he just inherited? The British posh set don't run around in gothic gowns and streetwear. They already have the cream of the crop to choose from during LFW. I'd have much rather preferred Phoebe!

And Lola, I will add that many may not associate Burberry with luxury but Bailey have tried to introduce his consumers with niche demi-couture pieces over the years. It wasn't successful because it got derided (prime example was the peacock feather trench.) This won't work if Tisci will to go at it full-on because the British are not purveyors of luxury in the literal sense. It's considered vulgar. Besides, those who prefer that kind of thing can go to Paris or Italy.

And that is really what i don't understand about this new strategy they are trying to go for.

Burberry by Bailey when it was the hottest brand was great at being luxury and contemporary at the same time and before everybody. What was great about Burberry is that you really felt like Prorsum, Brit and London were handled with the same level of integrity.

It was really a brand where you could have bought a cheaper easy piece like a printed sweater from the Brit with a pair of pants from the London and a coat from the Prorsum. It was very clever and i think that the youth at the time responded to that. People who were buying the Brit line weren't buying "the cheaper version of the runway".

He tried to introduce precious fabrics to Burberry but as you said i don't think preciousness work for a brand so attached to an idea of practicality. Burberry sells clothes and is known for outerwear, people want luxury in a "well made" sense of the word not the preciousness. This is something that Riccardo will have to take into consideration.

I think that Riccardo can do it well if he doesn't make it all about himself. Givenchy really became about himself and got lost in the end. I think he has to handle it as a job where he has to follow a certain feel much like what Phoebe did with Chloé as opposed to Celine. He is working for a brand now, he doesn't have to revive something. I hope he gets it.
He went to St Martins school so i think he knows about that english spirit.

Maybe now, people in London will have more respect for big brands now.
 
Interested to see how it turns out as he wouldn't be my first choice for Burberry...
 
Burberry Hires Riccardo Tisci

Riccardo Tisci, who left his role as creative director at Givenchy in February of last year for what many presumed was the top job at Versace, has been installed at Burberry as chief creative officer, effective March 12. The British label made the announcement this morning, ending speculation that began the moment Christopher Bailey’s departure was announced in late October 2017.
During his 12-year tenure, Tisci turned Givenchy, which had not much in the way of a brand identity when he arrived in 2005, into one of LVMH’s powerhouse brands, with heat-generating runway shows and a commercial savvy that helped to usher in fashion’s obsession with streetwear. Tisci’s cool factor has been much missed in the year since his departure, though he has kept reasonably active. A new installment of his Nike collaboration was released in mid-February, and his work is to be featured in the Costume Institute’s upcoming “Heavenly Bodies” exhibition, a press conference in Rome on Monday revealed.

Marco Gobbetti, Burberry’s CEO as of last July, held the same role at Givenchy before his stint at Céline, so it’s a wonder that Tisci’s name has not come up more often in discussions about who would replace Bailey. (Céline’s Phoebe Philo and Louis Vuitton’s recent menswear designer, Kim Jones, were the designers most often talked about.)

Tisci’s Burberry is likely to look different than Bailey’s. Where Bailey trumpeted heritage, Tisci celebrates hedonism. Having produced haute couture at Givenchy, Tisci also has a great deal of expertise (and red carpet exposure) for eveningwear, a category that Burberry hasn’t really invested in. But as out gay men, they do share common ground in their support of LGBTQ+ freedoms. Bailey’s rainbow-hued swansong for Spring 2018 (Burberry is currently operating on a see-now-buy-now model) will raise money for LGBTQ+ charities globally.
In a statement, Tisci said, “I am honored and delighted to be joining Burberry as its new chief creative officer and reuniting with Marco Gobbetti. I have an enormous respect for Burberry’s British heritage and global appeal and I am excited about the potential of this exceptional brand.”

Vogue
 
Weird combo! He'd be perfect for Versace or Chanel.

So I guess he will move the brand to MFW again and will have models from around the world to do the campaign.
 
I like the fact that they hired a foreigner for the job, kind of a little jab at Brexit

Not entirely sold on the fit either though, is Riccardo strong enough to pull Burberry off?
 
Weird combo! He'd be perfect for Versace or Chanel.

So I guess he will move the brand to MFW again and will have models from around the world to do the campaign.
^My thoughts exactly.

But this is really is an exciting move for Burberry. I can't wait to see what's in store for the brand.
 
Well it cannot be any worse than Slimane at Celine, that being said his gothic/dark aesthetic is devoid of any British/English sensibility afaik.
 
Weird combo! He'd be perfect for Versace or Chanel.

So I guess he will move the brand to MFW again and will have models from around the world to do the campaign.

He's relocating to London so I don't think so.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,242
Messages
15,215,244
Members
87,201
Latest member
Manouska
Back
Top