Sabato De Sarno - Designer, Creative Director of Gucci

Why is this the first thing we see when we open the page? Secundary thematic campaign with a tennis star selling god knows what. Total nonsense.

If they did user experience research, they would know better and put their new shiny product front and center with a good SHOP NOW button . There is no product or storytelling. It's just noise.

That's my UI design rant :boxer:
View attachment 1292573
“Gucci is a feeling” and it’s pretty cheap…
 
“Gucci is a feeling”...but the creative director is numb.

giphy.gif

giphy.com
 
The problem with current state of Gucci is Michele himself. He is the one Who cheapened the brand. It's funny how fashion pack praised him for being "great" but indeed he turned Gucci from elegant and glamorous heritage brand to a cheaper copy of LV by Pharrell. Let's be clear, Gucci sales skyrocketed thanks to few items, no one bought the ready to wear stuff. Gucci success was: fur slippers from 2015 to 2018, Marmont bag, tacky logo belt, but most importantly those super cheap and tacky monogrammed hoodies and sweat pants. Remember Jeffree Star in 2018? That was basically Gucci customer. You really think Gucci customers were interested in Cosmogonie or twins collections? Please, you are delusional.
There is no way to perform a brand elevation in such short time span. They Should have milked the Michele astethetic instead of going 180.
Gucci is now a cheapened version of LV for bad Boys and their hookers with questionable boobie job.
 
Questionable boobie job!! sound so Ancora coded lol

Anyways they are milking the Michele items so no fear!!!! because they became/remained the core product offer now, however cheap they are it's what pays the bills and the web site in usa that has the most items online if full of older stuff updated or as they were pre Ancora.

Department corners are very Michela coded items style with just logo on them, just the flowers and disney decorations are gone and color palette.

Also Michele was before LV by Pharrell so by default it can't be a copy lol
 
Ok Sabato.
No! I despise Sabato and his work. I had great hopes for his tenure but he turned out to be the most basic gay guy Who work in fashion. Absolutely nothing to say and no vision whatsoever. At least Michele was tacky and targeted a specific demographic, Sabato offering is worse than H&M with LV Prices.
It is clear that the biggest talent in the Valentino team (Pierpaolo Piccioli, Gabriele Cusimano, Sabato) was indeed Gabriele Cusimano.
Worst thing about Sabato was going full basic for the first fashion show with no logo and understated clothing and then getting Kendall and Bad Bunny in airport lounge (they never Flown commercial) in super tacky fluo colored monogram duffles.
 
The problem with current state of Gucci is Michele himself. He is the one Who cheapened the brand. It's funny how fashion pack praised him for being "great" but indeed he turned Gucci from elegant and glamorous heritage brand to a cheaper copy of LV by Pharrell. Let's be clear, Gucci sales skyrocketed thanks to few items, no one bought the ready to wear stuff. Gucci success was: fur slippers from 2015 to 2018, Marmont bag, tacky logo belt, but most importantly those super cheap and tacky monogrammed hoodies and sweat pants. Remember Jeffree Star in 2018? That was basically Gucci customer. You really think Gucci customers were interested in Cosmogonie or twins collections? Please, you are delusional.
There is no way to perform a brand elevation in such short time span. They Should have milked the Michele astethetic instead of going 180.
Gucci is now a cheapened version of LV for bad Boys and their hookers with questionable boobie job.
That could not be any further from reality.

First, Gucci was BEYOND cheap during AM last years. BEYOND cheap. That’s why they wanted something plain, to try to recover from the logomania, maximalist and all over the place era.

Second, SdS’ Gucci looks nothing like Pharrell’s LV.

Gucci, as much as I hated AM, appealed to a super broad audience. It was not just Jeffrey Star. Even the very rich would want something by Gucci. Everyone wanted something by Gucci at a certain point of AM’s tenure.
 
The corporate memory (what customers remember) is the eccentric, logomania, maximalist Gucci from Michele.

It was not a vision for 2024, but maybe with too hard of a pivot they threw the baby out with the bathwater (in other words, ridding of what the masses loved and associated with 'Gucci')
 
Via: jingdaily.com

Luxury’s Q2 2024 results: Unpacking the blame put on China

Brands performance in the quarter shows that blaming China for sales declines oversimplifies deeper issues in brand management and consumer engagement.

Published July 29, 2024 in Hard Luxury
The Q2 2024 financial results for luxury companies reveal a complex landscape. While brands like Hermès report all-time high results, others like Gucci accelerate their decline.

As diverse as these results are, so is the performance in China. Blaming disappointing results on the Chinese market and the reluctance of Chinese luxury clients to meet forecasts is an oversimplification. Let's delve into the specifics and analyze why blaming China is misleading.

Hermès reported strong performance, with organic revenue up by 15.1% in the first half of 2024 and 13.3% in the second quarter. “The Leather Goods and Saddlery métier (+19%) posted a remarkable performance, thanks to the increase in production capacities and particularly sustained demand,” according to Hermès’ press release, indicating high demand for core products like the Birkin and Kelly bags.

Hermès has become the benchmark in luxury brand execution, focusing on brand equity, storytelling, and exceptional client experience, never offering discounts. In Asia, the brand posted growth in all countries, with the half-year report noting, “as a reminder, performance in the second quarter of 2023 was exceptional, following the lifting of health measures in China.”

Hermès offers a balanced commentary on the current situation, unlike some companies blaming economic headwinds for not meeting sales targets. For instance, Kering reported an 11% organic decline in revenue for Q2 2024 and the first half of the year, attributing this to a “challenging market environment.”

Gucci, Kering’s biggest brand, was down 19% organically, with a 20% decline in its directly operated stores, further accelerating its decline over the last quarters.

Brand storytelling as a critical challenge​

Hermès and Gucci's brand management could not be more contrasting. Hermès excels in long-term brand storytelling, while Gucci departed significantly from its former creative direction and client-centric storytelling to a subdued product-focused approach.

This shift has logically turned clients away. Many underperforming brands suffer from inconsistencies in brand storytelling, while growing brands master this art.

The world is moving from a product-centric to a client-centric reality, where the ability to create cultural capital is crucial. Brands unable to create desirability face immediate client reactions.


China: A convenient scapegoat?​

Economic conditions in China pose challenges, but attributing luxury brands’ performance issues predominantly to this market overlooks critical factors. Chinese luxury consumers are traveling and spending more abroad, particularly in markets like Japan, Dubai, and France, where they benefit from significant price differentials.

This trend, well-documented on Chinese social media, has influenced purchasing behaviors. Analysts indicate that Chinese luxury clients spend more overall, just not in China.

On Little Red Book and other platforms, buyers discuss how some brands, including Hermès, Balenciaga, and Louis Vuitton, are 30-40% cheaper in Japan or France, prompting many to purchase luxury goods outside China.
This benefits brands with high brand equity, exacerbating demand issues for brands with weaker storytelling. To counter this, some brands like Balenciaga have offered significant price promotions in China, further eroding trust in their value proposition.

Chinese luxury buyers today expect more than just products; they seek unique experiences and deep engagement with brands. In recent VIP client ambassador trainings in China, it was evident that VIC service in China is more advanced than in the US or Europe, yet Chinese clients still expect more. Western brands often lack localized strategies, luxury experience trainings, and digital integration necessary to resonate with these clients.

The advanced digital landscape in China complicates matters for brands that fail to leverage digital platforms effectively or offer seamless online and offline experiences. Continuous innovation in digital engagement, experience creation, and luxury training is crucial for maintaining relevance in this dynamic market.

The way forward​

Blaming China for luxury brands’ performance challenges is an oversimplification. Understanding intricate consumer behaviors and adapting strategies accordingly is key. Brands must address price transparency better than by destroying brand equity with price promotions.

Enhancing digital engagement and aligning with sophisticated Chinese consumer expectations domestically and globally is essential. Only through a faster, more nuanced, and adaptive approach can luxury brands navigate this critical market's complexities and secure sustainable growth.

Hermès consistently shows that rigorous long-term strategic brand equity building, storytelling, and client experience creation are critical to creating cultural capital and desirability, which also pay off financially.

My recommendation to luxury brands: don’t blame economic headwinds. Audit your brand and your ability to connect with clients in China and beyond.

The real issues for underperformance are almost always internal, not external.
Shifting blame to the market wastes precious time needed for course correction.

In China’s fast-paced ecosystem, wasting time is losing momentum.


This is an opinion piece by Daniel Langer, CEO of Équité, recognized as one of the “Global Top Five Luxury Key Opinion Leaders to Watch.” He serves as an executive professor of luxury strategy and pricing at Pepperdine University in Malibu and as a professor of luxury at NYU, New York. Daniel has authored best-selling books on luxury management in English and Chinese, and is a respected global keynote speaker.
 
I hate when they go: in this challenging and fast changing socioeconomic environment…

Girl, your product design is garbage, your image is not relevant, the quality is sh!t, your campaigns are ugly and your creative director has the depth of a little pond. What did you expect, my dear?

I also believe in smooth and sustainable growth. The Miu Miu growth, for instance, is scary. Why not working on desirability and scarcity rather than being a supermaket and let buyers get 10 pieces of the same bag?

Short term strategies by short-brained people.
 
I hate when they go: in this challenging and fast changing socioeconomic environment…

Girl, your product design is garbage, your image is not relevant, the quality is sh!t, your campaigns are ugly and your creative director has the depth of a little pond. What did you expect, my dear?

I also believe in smooth and sustainable growth. The Miu Miu growth, for instance, is scary. Why not working on desirability and scarcity rather than being a supermaket and let buyers get 10 pieces of the same bag?

Short term strategies by short-brained people.
Gucci product line vs Louis Vuitton right now is shocking. The most recent women’s collection for LV looks so lux, modern and fashionable. Their bags are also way more desirable than they used to be imo and they have so many SKUs that everyone can find something they like. Gucci website offerings on the other hand look straight off canal street. Seriously. So so so so so bad
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,456
Messages
15,185,246
Members
86,301
Latest member
jsmc23
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->