The Business of Magazines

This Tonchi saga...I really have not enjoyed his tenure at W, but at this stage he's become integral to the magazine's survival, so to cut him loose at this stage is a bit of a no hope (unrelated but how has he got away with earning that kind of annual salary when his publication has seemingly failed to make even the most minor profit for years!?). He should have been let go or ceremoniously transferred somewhere else (unimportant) a good five years ago.

The new EIC of this magazine doesn't have to be a woman or a man, but it can't be Sara Moonves. She has 0 talent and very limited experience, even as a stylist, which means this new age of of W will be short-lived and more catastrophic than what's going on at Interview right now...
 
This Tonchi saga...I really have not enjoyed his tenure at W, but at this stage he's become integral to the magazine's survival, so to cut him loose at this stage is a bit of a no hope (unrelated but how has he got away with earning that kind of annual salary when his publication has seemingly failed to make even the most minor profit for years!?). He should have been let go or ceremoniously transferred somewhere else (unimportant) a good five years ago.

The new EIC of this magazine doesn't have to be a woman or a man, but it can't be Sara Moonves. She has 0 talent and very limited experience, even as a stylist, which means this new age of of W will be short-lived and more catastrophic than what's going on at Interview right now...

Agreed on every word. Was Sara Moonves connected to the Surface CEO in any way? because he talks about her like she an icon or something....Something is off there...
 
Agreed on every word. Was Sara Moonves connected to the Surface CEO in any way? because he talks about her like she an icon or something....Something is off there...

Per WWD: "Lotenberg is an owner of the newly formed media company, along with Eric Crown — a tech millionaire and prominent Republican fundraiser based in Arizona". And we all know who Sara's dad is, so.
 
Per WWD: "Lotenberg is an owner of the newly formed media company, along with Eric Crown — a tech millionaire and prominent Republican fundraiser based in Arizona". And we all know who Sara's dad is, so.

Yeah, it's more clear now...maybe Sara brought Lotenberg or convince him to bid for W in exchange to make her EIC and put Tonchi out....interesting...
 
I would not be surprised and Anna might have helped. She tolerates Moonves.

I love CN playing the mean girls haha
 
What an extraordinary turn of events! Suddenly the stakes are so high for that debut edition under the new owners, and everybody's eyes stuck on the way they conduct business and all their dirty laundry being aired by WWD. Lol. I bet they regret ever buying this magazine, which btw is in tatters so they'll have to overhaul it in grand proportions.
 
wwd.com
W Magazine Transition Off to Bumpy Start Under New Owner
Kali Hays
5-6 minutes
It’s been a week since W magazine was sold, and already there may be a bit of discord brewing.

Sources tell WWD an issue over pay is bubbling up between some W employees set adrift and Surface Media, which last week closed a deal to acquire W and formed Future Media Group. Although a small handful of employees, including W’s digital director and p.r. director, decided not to sign on with Surface/Future of their own accord, another small group — thought to be under 10 and working in digital and print — were terminated by Condé Nast and not hired by Surface/Future. But many were needed to keep the site running and print production for Issue 4 on schedule, so were asked to work last week, assuming they would be compensated or receive some type of severance. But they are said to have received no severance from Condé and gone unpaid for most of last week. Sources say their inquiries to Surface have been met with that company putting responsibility for pay on Condé.

Someone close to Condé’s operations, who requested anonymity, denied that this was the case while Surface chief executive officer Marc Lotenberg said he was “not aware” of anyone working and going unpaid. Speaking from an event in Europe, Lotenberg said “less than a handful” of W staff either did not sign on or were not offered roles and that “anyone who worked either has been or will be paid.”

Stefano Tonchi, W’s former editor in chief, is also claiming his own pay issues. He last week sued Condé’s corporate parent Advance Publications for just over $1 million, claiming he was wrongfully denied severance pay and classified by Condé executives as being terminated with “cause,” leaving the company to claim his employment agreement was null. As reported by WWD, Tonchi became less enamored with a sale to Surface/Future after learning some past details of Lotenberg’s business dealings and the reputations of Surface’s operations and its current backers for the W purchase.

As for those who signed on to work for Surface/Future, while some are looking forward to a new day for the publication under new editor in chief Sara Moonves, there’s also some concern about what they may have gotten into.

In a morning meeting the day of the sale announcement, W staffers were summoned in an e-mail by Anna Wintour, editor in chief of Vogue and Condé’s artistic director, and told that they had 24 hours to sign on with the new company and failure to do so would be considered a resignation from Condé, meaning the company had no responsibility toward them. Nevertheless, so many people held out, allegedly including executive director Armand Limnander, that the signing deadline was extended until end of day on June 27. Now Lotenberg says roughly 37 W employees have signed on, including Limnander, editor at large Lynn Hirschberg and features director Diane Solway. Lotenberg also noted that some freelancers or part-timers were offered full-time positions and accepted.

But even with signatures, there’s some concern over the language of the Surface/Future employment contracts. Not only do they include clear language that everyone is entering into a three-month “introductory period” that includes no access to benefits for those coming from part-time or freelance status, or paid time off, but that employment after the three-month period depends on a “satisfactory evaluation” of their work. This, along with Lotenberg’s plans to have all employees work across W, Watch Journal and Surface, has unsurprisingly given rise to chatter that there will be a round of layoffs in a few months’ time.

But Lotenberg insisted there are no plans to reduce the staff.

“We’re thinking about adding to the business and building new revenue streams. We’re investing,” he told WWD. “It’s not about how to cut our way to greatness, it’s about building up around all the amazing talent that’s at W.”

Still, the contracts also purportedly include a non-disclosure agreement, setting some staffers on edge. Beyond that, the contracts list 11 “House Rules” for working at Surface/Future that start with basic guidelines for informative magazine writing but quickly turn more prescriptive, with number three being, “The magazine is a commercial product; revenue comes first.” Number four: “The creative process is collaborative; management decisions are not.” Number five: “This is a drama-free office. Do not cause a scene or complain openly in the workspace.” Number six: “Get your job done without being told.” Some things that employees have been told: work starts at 9 a.m. and “Summer Fridays,” a longstanding tradition at Condé, are a thing of the past.

I'll be shocked if this works out...
 
^^^ omg i feel so bad for everyone there. heard through the grapevine it's a mess!

i still do not understand this deal or how it is going to be profitable nor how sara is going to change direction of the magazine?
 
What a big ugly disastrous mess... W was already a mess when I worked for them for editorials but now oh my, I cant imagine.
 
Vogue Italia deserves to have a rival on its doorstep.

I bought a few copies of the Italian edition back in the early 90s, and while the covers had a similar feel to the US version, I remember being very underwhelmed by the contents. But the covers it produced in the 70s, 80s and 90s are well worth a look for those who like a vintage mag.

Will the next resurrection be French Bazaar?
 
Vogue Italia deserves to have a rival on its doorstep.

I bought a few copies of the Italian edition back in the early 90s, and while the covers had a similar feel to the US version, I remember being very underwhelmed by the contents. But the covers it produced in the 70s, 80s and 90s are well worth a look for those who like a vintage mag.

Will the next resurrection be French Bazaar?
Wow, it’s a relaunch?
 
Interesting timing. I assume Italian readers also think Vogue Italia lost its way and Harper's Bazaar is trying to lure them in; they must have done good marketing research beforehand.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,410
Messages
15,221,427
Members
87,300
Latest member
bersolli
Back
Top