I mean, I got my new issue of UK Vogue in the mail today and it's what, 200 pages? Undeniably that's more thicc than all but the March and September issues of US Vogue these days, but it's hardly a tome. Pages and pages of cheapo adverts in the back. And the issue itself is discounted with a sticker on the cover advertising that it's £2. They're basically giving them away, whereas US Vogue, though slim, still commands $8 or $10 on the newsstand and is never discounted. So right away I'd say CN is taking a substantial hit on those issues of UK Vogue because they're desperate to sell as many as possible, because they're relying more or less entirely on the print advertising.
US Vogue still has more print advertising than most American magazines. GQ, Esquire, Elle Decor, House Beautiful, Vanity Fair, etc. etc. all these magazines I get are regularly hovering around 100 pages (often less) per month. So yeah, 125-150 pages for US Vogue isn't good, but it actually is notably thicker than many other American magazines. Meanwhile, I log onto Instagram, YouTube, or even Tiktok and I'm seeing US Vogue content with super high engagement, sometimes tens of millions of views, digital advertising exclusives with brands like Gucci and Burberry. Brands are still working with US Vogue, it's just increasingly digital. And that seems to be the direction most will be forced, and one that seems more sustainable for the immediate future. Take US Vogue's youtube channel as an example. Close to 9 million subscribers, a couple BILLION views on their videos, tens of millions per month. Not even counting specific brand sponsorships, I'd say they probably make 3 million just off their cut of the youtube-placed ads. Then you get into their sponsored content, website ads, instagram ads, etc. I'm not an expert, but US Vogue is definitely pulling in millions and millions in online advertising, and probably still command top dollar (more than UK Vogue) for print ads, too. UK Vogue probably makes in a month what US Vogue does in a day, in terms of online revenue. That's increasingly where advertisers are putting their budgets.
I love print magazines, and I will be upset if/when they stop printing magazines, at least on a monthly basis. However, I cannot pretend, looking forward to 2021 and beyond, that focusing on print ads (and then having to greatly discount your magazine to move them so you can maintain your numbers to keep the print advertisers coming back) is best business practice.
It’s interesting how any news about Anna and Edward has always lead to the discussion about their treatments to their respective editions on this forum even if the initial news itself doesn’t focus on such topic.
First of all, how do you even know if Edward is more or less focusing entirely on print advertising? As far as I’m concerned, the total revenue from digital advertising is rarely published to the public. For all we know, the inventories that UK Vogue sells on their website are selling like crazy, not to mention if they make them available for programmatic buying, which has been a common practice for display network, digital placement.
And how on earth did his decision to discount prices affect the entirety of CN? I’m genuinely confused as to how that works entirely. We may not know if percentages of his magazine’s revenue is bigger, less big, or as big as US Vogue’s but even without the available information on online revenues, his ad pages were significantly more than the majority of Vogue editions all over the world. How did that hurt the CN business as you implied?