The Business of Magazines

^He used to send nudes to a lot of people in the fashion people on Instagram. Like his ***, his d*ck, etc. Out of the blue like that, you could receive his nudes...

He has also a stalker behaviour. If you did not respond to his dm, he will try to reach you by calling you, through emails etc.
 
^He used to send nudes to a lot of people in the fashion people on Instagram. Like his ***, his d*ck, etc. Out of the blue like that, you could receive his nudes...

He has also a stalker behaviour. If you did not respond to his dm, he will try to reach you by calling you, through emails etc.
Omg :ninja:
 
^He used to send nudes to a lot of people in the fashion people on Instagram. Like his ***, his d*ck, etc. Out of the blue like that, you could receive his nudes...

He has also a stalker behaviour. If you did not respond to his dm, he will try to reach you by calling you, through emails etc.

OMG didn't know that but i guess he send it to the wrong people...and no idea he was young i thought he was in his late 30's...
 
^He used to send nudes to a lot of people in the fashion people on Instagram. Like his ***, his d*ck, etc. Out of the blue like that, you could receive his nudes...

He has also a stalker behaviour. If you did not respond to his dm, he will try to reach you by calling you, through emails etc.
Whoooo
 
The UK version of Cosmo already seems to have reduced down to a bimonthly schedule - we've had the Oct/Nov 21 cover with Awkwafina, the Dec/Jan cover with Khloe K and now a Feb/Mar 22 cover with Munroe Bergdorf, which also represents the magazine's 50th anniversary, but there wasn't much reflection or mention of it inside (uniquemagazines.co.uk). Looking online at Hearst UK's subscription page, a year's subscription seems to comprise six issues.

C 50th.jpg
 
Well, since the pandemic Vogue Latam edits 9-10 print editions (Dec/Jan; Feb; Mar; Apr; May (or May/Jun together); June; Jul/Aug; Sep; Oct; Nov) and GQ Latam 8 (Dec/Jan; Feb/Mar; Apr; May; Summer Issue; Sep; Oct; Nov). And Vogue Latam has smaller size since last September.
 
Something I found amusing (and sad) this weekend. Vogue posted this Penn image on Instagram in the lead up to the Superbowl (it was originally published in the November 2002 issue to illustrate the effects of overtreated skin). The comments are nearly all negative calling the image disturbing and inappropriate, with some demanding Vogue to take the image down and release a statement explaining their decision to publish it in the current climate where (apparently?) most football players abuse women(?).

This is a perfect example of what happens when the rarefied world of fashion is opened to the masses who have little to no knowledge of art, fashion or photographic history, not to mention the history of the magazine itself. These are the people that Vogue (and the designers, editors and photographers) are kowtowing to. If Penn were alive today, he would be cancelled by people who don't have any idea of who he is, nor any understanding of his imagery or his contribution to the history of fashion. Is it any wonder we get the likes of Tyler Mitchell, Rafael Pavarotti, Harley Weir and Hugo Comte dominating fashion today? Their imagery is safe, colourful, 'arty' and easily-digestible for the strangely conservative and close-minded masses today. What a time for fashion imagery.

 
Using that illustration in a magazine to accompany an article about dry, leathery skin made sense (I can remember it from the time). The texture and shape evokes the issue being addressed, and although slightly unsettling, the image goes hand in hand with the words.

But Vogue bigging up the Superbowl in 2022 by posting an image on mass media of a woman's head that's been disembodied and replaced by a football - something which is kicked, handled, thrown about - is something I can see many people being upset about. It's being used outside of its original reference, the context has been stripped away, and viewers are forced to go on face value.

Instead of seeing this as an audience lacking education, I see this as Vogue's failure to realise that context really matters when it comes to an image like this.
 
Using that illustration in a magazine to accompany an article about dry, leathery skin made sense (I can remember it from the time). The texture and shape evokes the issue being addressed, and although slightly unsettling, the image goes hand in hand with the words.

But Vogue bigging up the Superbowl in 2022 by posting an image on mass media of a woman's head that's been disembodied and replaced by a football - something which is kicked, handled, thrown about - is something I can see many people being upset about. It's being used outside of its original reference, the context has been stripped away, and viewers are forced to go on face value.

Instead of seeing this as an audience lacking education, I see this as Vogue's failure to realise that context really matters when it comes to an image like this.
I agree. The image just doesn’t suit the ‘Happy Superbowl Sunday’ message.

I remember a Kate Upton ed with football players. Why not use that shot?
 
That image made me uncomfortable. I haven't read the context yet and it rubbed me the wrong way already.

Inexcusable. The online editor needs to respond to this.
 
I agree. The image just doesn’t suit the ‘Happy Superbowl Sunday’ message.

I remember a Kate Upton ed with football players. Why not use that shot?

By Testino i think right?....i remember one with Raquel and Trentini but i think that was from Vogue Paris
 
By Testino i think right?....i remember one with Raquel and Trentini but i think that was from Vogue Paris
Yes by Testino. The Raquel and Trentone one was indeed from VP.
 
Apparently Vogue Hommes shut down. Their last post on IG was october 28th and the suscription option on their website isn’t available anymore.
 
Linda Evangelista is on the cover of the next issue of People magazine!!!
 


''Once one of the most photographed people in the world, supermodel Linda Evangelista has been living in seclusion for almost five years. Now she's finally ready to share her story. In this week's issue of PEOPLE, Evangelista opens up about the emotional and physical pain that has cast a shadow on her life in recent years, after she claims a cosmetic procedure left her "permanently deformed" and "brutally disfigured." Pick up the issue on stands Friday, and tap the bio link for her story.''

source: People magazine instagram
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Kerg

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,786
Messages
15,199,241
Members
86,798
Latest member
Melreneestyles
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->