The Business of Magazines | Page 182 | the Fashion Spot

The Business of Magazines

CONTINUED......

Jimmy Moffat, founder of Red Hook Labs, the photography studio and exhibition space in Brooklyn and cofounder of Art & Commerce

“I think there is an actually really interesting, wonderful, powerful, new group of photographers emerging from backgrounds that we’ve never seen before. It’s a really fascinating time.” Asked who these groups are, he replied, “Women, people of color. The fashion industry has been dominated in its entire industry by white, male photographers. We’ve seen in the past couple of years a wonderful influx of really talented women photographers, and now you’re starting to see a group of young African-American, second-generation African and photographers of color really entering the market and producing incredibly exciting work.”

One person he would definitely highlight is the 23-year-old British woman Nadine Ijewere, second-generation African, her family is from Nigeria, and she’s an artist in residence at Red Hook Labs. She has contributed to Nataal, the online digital media platform that’s being published for the first time in June, run by Sara Hemming and Helen Jennings. “It’s a wonderful source for emerging photographers from Africa and the Diaspora,” he said.

Ijewere is being repped by Camilla Lowther Management in London and has photographed for Italian Vogue, Stella McCartney and Adidas.

He also pointed to Campbell Addy, “a young, black London photographer. There’s a young African-American artist whose name is Tyler Mitchell, who’s super talented and super young. These guys are all friends,” he said. He also cited Ronan McKenzie and Ruth Ossai. “I’ve discovered them and I’m going to show their work in May. I think there’s a really interesting young group. I think what’s also interesting is these kids, because they’re all in their early 20s, have bypassed the traditional pathway. Now, with social media, and particularly Instagram, kids are being discovered all the time. I discover photographers all the time on Instagram. They get hired directly by clients who have no patience anymore necessarily for going through creative agencies.

“What’s really important to me is to teach kids from Red Hook in the South Bronx. Some of the kids I’m teaching are really good and are really talented. And they had the same opportunity to even consider this industry. My friend, Jaime Perlman, who used to be a creative director of British Vogue, is coming out this summer with a magazine called Less Is More about fashion under $100. My students are shooting fashion stories for her, and they’re amazing.” He is involved with an organization in Los Angeles called Las Fotos, with teenage Latino photographers. “A young woman named Jasbeth Perez photographed a fashion story in a skate park for Less Is More, and it’s one of the best fashion stories I’ve seen,” said Moffat.

As for which photographers are doing the big fashion magazine covers, he said, “I’ve had the privilege of working with Steven Meisel for 30 years, and he’s widely known for taking care of models, respecting models and helping models succeed. He’s doing much of the major fashion work today. There will never be another Steven Meisel. He’s the greatest fashion photographer in history, and he’s still going strong. Inez and Vinoodh are wonderful and they’re doing a lot.”

Stephen Frailey, chair, BFA of video and photography department of the School of Visual Arts


“The first thing that comes to mind, other than the students who are graduating from our graduate fashion program, is the generation of photographers who are still influencing and who are still thought of as relatively new — Jamie Hawkesworth, Julia Hetta and Harley Weir. One could say their work is already acknowledged. But I feel that they still represent a real shift in fashion photography toward something that has a lot more naturalism and lack of affect, and that also embraces other genres of photography such as landscaper and documentary.

“Female photographers, more so in fashion and commercial photography, are completely underrepresented. What’s considered fine art photography, although I am uncomfortable with that term, has become much more democratic. It’s possible that naturalism is a renunciation of a certain kind of macho, aggressive photography. What we consider to be a female sensibility has influenced both genders.

“The biggest things that I see in fashion photography is blurring the binary genders, which I think is also responsible for what I’m calling the kind of naturalism, and lack of affectation. A simple way of saying it is that it feels to me in a lot of my students’ work, and the names that I’ve mentioned, it’s a matter of photographing your friends, the people you hang around with and doing something that feels authentic and not highly stylized and artificial. There have been a lot of different points in the last 30 or 40 years in fashion where that has occurred. It seems to go back and forth between a sense of artifice and a sense of realism.”

Li Edelkoort, founder of Trend Union and dean of Hybrid Design Studies at the New School’s Parsons School of Design

“It’s all new names in a way so nobody has really been established in this new field. What I know is there are many, many female photographers and they do have a very different vision on color and composition and what is beautiful and not. The new wave of photographers will be much more inclusive. The eye has gotten so used to the thread-thin models that it will take some time, but already the eye is getting used to hugely different bodies, faces so the time for ethereal beauty has sort of been left behind. It’s more real. I think it’s very, very good. Certainly, there are many people falling off and they will have to be replaced. There is also a host of new editors-in-chief that will help to take the conversion to another period. In a way, it’s long overdue. Power, money, greed are always the same reasons why things don’t move. The late Corinne Day is almost like a role model for this new generation of girl photographers. Her type of photography and vision is what is now coming into bloom — the no-sock revolution.”

Source: WWD.com
 
Taken from Evening Standard's interview with British Vogue publisher, Vanessa Kingori.

Total sales are up 7.5 per cent since Edward’s first issue and UK newsstands sales have also increased. Total advertising revenue is up too, fuelled by a 26 per cent increase in digital advertising, and the company reports a 1,033 per cent increase in events and special projects revenue.

...and apparently Naomi is no longer tardy! :lol:

More over here:

https://www.standard.co.uk/fashion/vanessa-kingori-vogue-edward-enninful-a3827146.html
 
I don't get why the Japanese would invest in something which clearly sounds like a blatant money grab! Their own cover (which, get this, wouldn't be exclusive) and one original edit, but essentially everything else would be identical to the main edition?

If Carine said one thing right in that article, it's that Japan has the best bookstores! There is definitely still a strong culture for print in Japan, but I'm skeptical, especially because there are literally so many fashion magazines published in Japan to begin with. Aside from translating it into Japanese, what's the draw for readers? People don't exactly buy CR for the written content.
 
If Carine said one thing right in that article, it's that Japan has the best bookstores! There is definitely still a strong culture for print in Japan, but I'm skeptical, especially because there are literally so many fashion magazines published in Japan to begin with. Aside from translating it into Japanese, what's the draw for readers? People don't exactly buy CR for the written content.

True, and not just Japan. In all of Asia. But I understand why she chose Japan. Less censoring, a culture that's probably more familiar with avant garde fashion than Americans, and a thriving magazine audience. What I don't understand is the product she's trying to flog them which is shockingly subpar. They're not stupid, they'll pick up that they're being taken for mugs.

Hearst must have so much confidence in her magazines to give her so many inducements. Dunno why they don't just install her at HB permanently. That's her eventual spot anyway.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
An advice, girl use your time to improve that book/magazine/whatever.
 
I'm surprised to find that The Edit has been managed by Lucy because their features are far more superior than that of Porter and most other top magazines! But I'm glad to see that after the coalition, the quality is still the same (if not better!)

How Net-a-Porter’s 70-person content team operates online and in print

April 23, 2018 by Hilary Milnes

After running Porter and The Edit, Net-a-Porter’s print and digital titles, separately since 2013, global content director Lucy Yeomans combined the department into a unified front under the Porter name.

“Finally. We had been wanting to do it for a long time,” said Yeomans, who also serves as Porter’s editor-in-chief, a title she previously held at Harper’s Bazaar UK. “Porter is a brand name; it’s rooted in Net-a-Porter, whereas ‘The Edit’ as a title had gotten quite ubiquitous. Now, all of our content happens under one cross-channel platform. It’s more consistent.”

Content is a robust piece of both Net-a-Porter’s marketing and merchandising strategies: The company employs 70 people on its editorial team, and it publishes six issues of Porter’s print edition per year, which have featured celebrity cover stars like Emma Watson, Jessica Chastain and Bella Hadid. Previously, the print team at Porter and the digital content team at The Edit operated separately; while Yeomans oversaw both, there were silos separating each side of the content strategy. The Edit focused on trend-driven content, while Porter covered lifestyle, women’s issues, career and business content alongside its fashion editorial.

But as Net-a-Porter’s traffic shifted to more than 50 percent from mobile, Yeomans said, the need for a cohesive digital content platform became clear. Now, the combined content team works on Porter’s print magazine, as well as The Porter Edit, the digital content site on Net-a-Porter that is refreshed on a daily basis. Previously, The Edit was updated once a week. The editorial site is also translated for a global audience in French, German and Mandarin.

As the lines between editorial and advertising blur at other revenue-starved fashion publications, Net-a-Porter’s content-and-commerce play is working off of the advantage that it’s not dealing with dueling agendas. And in online luxury, as competition among multi-brand retailers stiffens, a strong editorial point of view is emerging as a key differentiator and loyalty driver, an important piece in driving down the steep cost of customer acquisition.

Since Porter sits in Net-a-Porter’s broader ecosystem, editorial’s positioning is the glue bonding marketing and merchandising together into a more consistent machine.

“Today, the customer expects content over straightforward advertising,” said Robert Burke, the CEO of retail and fashion consultancy Robert Burke Associates. “What these retailers can offer, that no one brand can, is industry context. That’s why content sounds fluffy, but is so critical.”

In Yeomans’ eyes, fashion magazines are always trying to sell us something, anyway, and we read them for inspiration. Net-a-Porter’s publications just create a shortcut to getting to the purchase.

“As long as we have our customer in mind throughout everything we do, there’s no reason content and commerce can’t work together,” said Yeomans. “We have a single, editorial point of view that we communicate with the merchandising team and that the marketing team promotes. It all makes sense in the end, if you’re taking the approach of, ‘What would our customer actually wear? What is she interested in?’ That’s our editorial integrity.”

To get on the same page, the editorial team will preview new collections at the same time the merchandising team does, and then they’ll discuss what brands, products and trends they feel strongly about and believe will perform well on the site. That conversation continues as both departments discover new brands: If an editor comes across a new accessories brand not carried by Net-a-Porter, it will tip off the merchandising team, and the merchandising team will flag undiscovered designers for potential coverage.

The editorial team also looks to customer data when deciding what customers want to hear about, from Net-a-Porter’s trend performance reports, personal stylists and conversations with “EIPs,” or extremely-important people, Net-a-Porter’s highest-spending customers that drive about 50 percent of the company’s sales.

“When I was the editor at Harper’s Bazaar, I would have no idea what our readers were responding to,” said Yeomans. “Now I can watch what’s flying off the shelves and I know exactly what she’s buying.”

With editorial now backing one digital-print platform, there’s more opportunity for involved initiatives that extend beyond the publications. Yeomans said an editorial committee is working on a “content plus commerce plus cause” event this summer that, in partnership with a philanthropic organization, will include a content series, an event and a limited-edition capsule collection sold through Net-a-Porter.

“We can now take a cross-platform approach that we really couldn’t before,” said Yeomans.

Source: Digiday.com
 
Kay Barron was promoted from Fashion Features Director to Fashion Director of Porter Magazine she replaces Gabriele Hackworthy who left to Jimmy Choo.

I’m very surprised with this appointment.
 
lol

Vanity Fair up in arms after GQ pokes fun at Photoshop fail
By Emily Smith

Kate McKinnon, Issa Rae and Sarah Silverman grace the cover of GQ’s new comedy issue, each with a few extra arms and legs, mercilessly mocking Vanity Fair’s epic Photoshop fail — but staffers at VF are failing to see the funny side.

The three comedians pose in glamorous gowns, but a closer look reveals there are extra contorted arms and legs added into the image. The cover parodies the 2018 Hollywood Issue of GQ’s fellow Condé Nast publication, Vanity Fair, on which Reese Witherspoon appeared to have three legs and Oprah Winfrey had an extra hand.

But Condé insiders say Vanity Fair execs are furious — because GQ apparently didn’t give them any advance warning about the hilarious spoof.

A Condé source said, “There is mass fury at VF today, the staff and editors are really upset. GQ is spoofing the VF cover which came out with all the Photoshop mistakes, the mysterious extra legs and hands attached to Oprah.

“But Jim Nelson, the editor-in-chief at GQ, never told Vanity Fair editor-in-chief Radhika Jones, or anyone else at VF, that he was planning this.

“They are being mocked by a sister publication, nobody told them in advance, and they found out about it at the same time as everyone else, when the GQ cover was released.”

The Vanity Fair Hollywood Issue caused a Twitter storm back in January as fans pointed out the strange errors in the Annie Leibovitz photograph featuring a host of A-list actors.

Even Witherspoon weighed in, writing on Twitter, “I have 3 legs. I hope you can still accept me for who I am.” Oprah gamely responded, “I accept your 3d leg, as I know you accept my 3d hand.”

VF played it down with humor at the time, tweeting, “While we would have loved the exclusive on @RWitherspoon’s three legs, unfortunately it’s just the lining of her dress.” But the mag did admit it overplayed its hand with Oprah and would correct the image online.

Meanwhile, on the new GQ cover, a random hand strokes Rae’s shoulder, while the “Insecure” star appears to have a third, extra-long arm reaching around Silverman’s body. Plus McKinnon’s right leg is impossibly contorted over Silverman’s shoulder.

There is also a random leg and hand added for extra effect, along with the tag line, “Hands down our best comedy issue ever!”

A rep for Vanity Fair declined to comment, directing us to the magazine’s pun-tastic Thursday tweet about the GQ cover: “It’s not going out on a limb to say we love Issa, Kate, and Sarah. Props to @GQMagazine for getting a leg up on this trend.”

GQ’s Nelson told Page Six, “This is just a magazine gag, and yes, a tribute in parody. We dreamed it up in collaboration with three of the funniest comedians we know, so hopefully people have a laugh. I hope to see a forthcoming VF fashion feature of men jumping in suits.”

A brutal editor’s letter also pokes further fun at Vanity Fair.

The letter, titled “Mistakes were made,” reads, “GQ would like to apologize to Kate McKinnon, Issa Rae, and Sarah Silverman for the egregious mistakes made in the process of creating the cover for our 2018 comedy issue. … Our intention was to celebrate the three super-funny superstars, who are all that is smart and perceptive and riotous and necessary in comedy right now. We deeply regret that the results violated GQ’s rigorous standards of editorial excellence and the laws of nature.

“In an effort to ensure that an error of this magnitude never happens again, and because this sounds like the right thing to say, GQ will be conducting a thorough internal audit of our cover-development process. To demonstrate our commitment to transparency, we will release the results of the review, quietly, in 17 months, on Medium.

“And to you, our respected readers, we know that GQ must work doubly hard to earn back your trust. Until then, we’ll be ignoring our mentions.

“Come back to GQ.com next week to read the profiles of our three wildly talented, extremely two-handed cover stars. In the meantime, we’ll be praying that Donald Trump tweets something about Chrissy Teigen in the next hour so everybody forgets all about this.”
source | pagesix
 

Attachments

  • 053A1BE9-24F9-4F17-A83E-DE394689C183.jpeg
    053A1BE9-24F9-4F17-A83E-DE394689C183.jpeg
    206.1 KB · Views: 29
I love his cover and editor’s letter, it’s brilliant. GQ has to be one of the dullest, mediocre publications around, so the fact they actually decided to do something bold and funny is great. They’re part of Conde Nast just like VF, so I assume everyone who needed to know was aware it was coming. Part of me has this perfect little scene in my head of Anna signing off the cover with a smirk.
 
Part of me has this perfect little scene in my head of Anna signing off the cover with a smirk.

She does oversee GQ as well, so she knew and she probably did sign off on it with that smirk! I love it too, it's brilliant.
 
its probably one of the most hilarious PS fails in history lol. well done GQ well done Anna:rofl:
 
REPORT: 'INTERVIEW' MAGAZINE IS FOLDING
Another print publication is coming to an end. On Monday morning came reports that Interview Magazine has folded, according to announcements made on social media by those on staff. Since its launch in 1969 by Andy Warhol, Interview has been known for its extensive coverage of fashion, film, art and music, as well as many visually striking covers.

However, Interview has been facing some challenges over the past few years. In 2016, former Editor-in-Chief Keith Pollock left the magazine for an executive director role, overseeing Architectural Digest's digital content. Shortly after, other departures from the Interview team followed, including Senior Fashion and Accessories Editor Julia Gall (who is now an Accessories Director at Marie Claire).

This year has been especially taxing for the publication, which is currently in the midst of two major lawsuits. In February, Page Six reported that Interview's owner Peter Brant is facing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit from former longtime senior executive Deborah Blasucci, who claims that she was fired from her position (of more than 30 years) for making "too much money." In addition, Interview's staff was allegedly locked out of the Soho-based office by the building's manager because Brant has not paid its rent.

Also, Fabien Baron, who served as Editorial Director alongside Creative Director Karl Templer until April (both resigned), is suing Interview for about $600,000 due to unpaid invoices from 2015 to 2018, according to Page Six. Baron's wife, stylist Ludivine Poiblanc, is also owed $66,000 for her own work with the magazine. From the looks of it, the publication's end was inevitable, but it's unfortunate that it's such a messy (and expensive) one.
Fashionista.com
 
^ Whoa, so it is actually going down? For years you heard, and read how bad things are for them, but to fold officially, it is a loss. I always enjoyed the content, even if the covers were random!
 
Interview Magazine Shutting Down

Interview magazine is no more.

The magazine founded by Pop Art arbiter Andy Warhol nearly 50 years ago is shutting down today, according to now former employees, like senior online editor Trey Taylor, who wrote on Twitter of the closure. A representative of Brant Publications did not deny the magazine is closing, but declined to comment further.

Earlier this month Interview was sued by its former editorial director Fabien Baron and his wife, stylist Ludivine Poiblanc, over more than $600,000 in unpaid invoices, and a source claimed that many lower-ranking editorial contributors had also gone unpaid.

Baron’s lawsuit is not the only one Interview is dealing with. Former sales representative and eventually associate publisher Jane Katz last year sued the magazine for unpaid wages of more than $230,000, along with claims that she was unjustly fired. Dan Ragone, who was Interview’s president for six years, also sued in 2016 for allegedly unpaid wages of about $170,000 and that case is still working its way through the courts.

When looked at from a publishing standpoint, it’s little surprise that Interview is shutting down. It seems the masthead has been slowly winnowed and not updated online. Without Baron and the photographer Karl Templer, who weeks ago left his position as the magazine’s creative director, Interview was operating with major gaps in editorial leadership.

Brant Publications is owned by billionaire Peter Brant, who is a well-known art lover and Warhol fan. He and his then-wife Sandra bought Interview shortly after Warhol’s death in 1987 and Ingrid Sischy and Sandy Brant took the title over three years later, turning it into a must-read about the fashion and art crowd. Sandy Brant, who had been acting as chief executive officer and publisher, sold her 50 percent stake in its parent company to her former husband in 2008, and he”relaunched” it under Baron’s leadership. Brant’s daughter Kelly Brant has been running the publication as president for the last several years.

Austen Tosone, until now an assistant editor at Interview, wrote on Twitter that his six months at the magazine was “certainly a crazy ride.”

http://wwd.com/business-news/media/interview-magazine-closing-shutting-down-1202678246/
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,403
Messages
15,301,325
Members
89,397
Latest member
tasmaniarz
Back
Top