I'm pretty sure the issue has been retailing for £2 for some time in Greater Birmingham (yes, some of us are still trying to make that new name happen,
.) And as for this issue, only the Idris Elba one is available at the main outlets and I can not for the life of me understand why they went with it. Not only is it an awful cover because the Vogue factor is completely missing to the point that it looks like a bridal magazine trying to find its feed, but at best his story should have been relegated to an editorial only. Really doubt whether they'll be making bank with this issue.
Zoe's editorial opens with the first shot in double-page format and it's truly something to behold. Very glossy, glamorous, especially with the art direction. But that's where it ended for me. The rest are just too retouched, and like Dodencebt alluded to, in a very short time Meisel has established a sort of template at British Vogue with his b&w studio shoots which is both a gift and a curse. It would have to take a model or celeb with strong presence to not turn it around and make it look refreshing. Because right now, I'm struggling to see the difference between this and the Hadids, Kaia, Cara, and Adwoa's edits. Actually, Adwoa's still got the strongest edit under him for UK Vogue so far.
I was hoping Jamie Hawkesworth would show us a rare, not often seen glimpse of Naomi, maybe something more natural and down-to-earth. I find that campy 'fierce kween' persona of hers so overlayed. Hawkesworth certainly tried, but it's not working. Btw the shoot took place in Kenya, and there are no hair & makeup credits, so maybe in Naomi's mind, this was probably her being natural and down-to-earth. And hopefully, Hawkesworth will stop with these beach editorials now that he's photographed Kate and Naomi. We've seen that so many times already in this very magazine under Colin Dodgson. His own signature is so much more better than this.