See - to me, the Zara looks posted here perfectly capture my problem with her Chloe. What distinguishes her Chloe from theirs?
I get it, it's tough - midmarket, fast fashion back in the day did not copy runway fashion in the same way they do now. Brands like Zara and H&M used to be cheap basics, not budget designer clothes. But, that's all the more reason why luxury and fashion designers have a responsibility to push themselves and their ateliers to make their clothes worth the price tag and investment.
Why would I shop at Chloe if I can get the exact same look at Zara?
It's a bigger existential question for the whole industry to be asking itself, but it's one they need to start thinking seriously about. Zara basically does the same work - faster, cheaper and better. Aside from the per yardage cost of the materials, there is often very little now that distinguishes a $4000 dress from a $40 one. What do you, as a true fashion designer, offer? What are you bringing to the table of value?
I get it, it's tough - midmarket, fast fashion back in the day did not copy runway fashion in the same way they do now. Brands like Zara and H&M used to be cheap basics, not budget designer clothes. But, that's all the more reason why luxury and fashion designers have a responsibility to push themselves and their ateliers to make their clothes worth the price tag and investment.
Why would I shop at Chloe if I can get the exact same look at Zara?
It's a bigger existential question for the whole industry to be asking itself, but it's one they need to start thinking seriously about. Zara basically does the same work - faster, cheaper and better. Aside from the per yardage cost of the materials, there is often very little now that distinguishes a $4000 dress from a $40 one. What do you, as a true fashion designer, offer? What are you bringing to the table of value?