Conventional Beauty vs Unconvential Beauty

[kissmesweet]

I like Classic actually. But Modern are great as well, since the fashion world is constantly looking for fresh and interesting faces - Gemma, Lisa?

One thing though - I can't stand Stella Tennant!!!

 

[justlooking]

I like both.

me too. if someone's beautiful, they're beautiful no matter how long their nose or wide-set their eyes, etc.

 

[AbbeyRoad]

Just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so is the opinion of whether a face is 'classic' or 'modern'. I tend to find the same features attractive, but on different faces they may come out looking differently to other people, you know? Hard to explain. But interesting discussion!

I vote classic, if Gia is an example. but in her day she was considered 'exotic'! how everything changes...



www.gia-carangi.com

 

[Trista]

I dunno about you but there's something both modern and classic in Tayla Collins.

As for Hilary she's definitely classic.

 

[Mchunu]

well in that case its abit difficult to choose but I guess conventional is more of my taste, they are easier on the eye. eg. Liya, Karolina, Fernanda, Adriana...

what an old thread, but i just wanted to say i don't think KK is a conventional beauty.. i don't Snejana ^ is a conventional beauty either. Her beauty is definitely unique. however, now models looks are SO OFF the anything that you can get used to quickly can be considered "conventional".

 

[chanterdanser]

The first time I saw a picture of Snejana (before I knew about models) I thought she was pretty in a very weird way. When I saw Sasha and Gemma, I thought they looked normal! But I think some models most people would agree are unconventional, for example Daiane and Masha! I like Daiane and Masha though.