Interview May 2010 : Madonna by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott

that's really "interesting" to read your opinion about this story ...
since I'm missing the racist part of that editorial.

From what I know about black community nightclubs in France, is that the white girls in these clubs are 85% of the time taken for prostitutes and sexual objects ....
so in my eyes, Daria here is having the weakest role ... the role of the sextoy for black men, and the one who's getting all the f*** words and hate from the black woman.

:ninja:

And this clearly describes what I'm seeing in the black community nightclubs: europeans dressed like for Cannes Festival (to put on fire the blacks), Black women dressed like the way they dress in nightclubs in Gabon, Cameroun or such ... short and sexy to bump-it-up and put on fire their boyfriends.

What are you even talking about?
The racial undertones are very blatant in this editorial.
All the brown people are used as props and pretty much a background for Daria. Not only that but, it is the typical "Jungle Fever" attitude a lot of white people have toward minorities. It has a defenseless, proper white woman in an "exotic" club surrounded by sweaty "others".

This editorial is tasteless and people defending this leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

& to whoever said race talk should be banned, I feel as long as the discussion remains on topic it shouldn't matter. Race if OBVIOUSLY an important factor in this editorial.
 
^Yeah, Daria looks like she would be lucky if it's sweat that makes her body so shiny. Really, she looks like an all-out p*rn "star". Not flattering at all....and how do you call her proper - a proper prostitute perhaps...and I don't see her as defenseless at all - she's fully conscious and has to resort to spreading her legs the widest in order to garner attention....hardly the stuff dreams are made of, or wait, oh it's quite the fad to be a stupid sl*t this year?

I don't think it's defending so much as having a different opinion. Why does that leave a bad taste in your mouth? I've noted the polemic style debates I see on topics such as this and am simply, and quite honestly, curious.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just came across this thread again and spent a little while reading through this entire conversation... I've found it very eye-roll inducing.
I can't help but think that if this editorial was the same but all featured were white, there would be no issue. That said, the black community is legally and morally as one with the rest of society (as they should be) thanks to the efforts of those before them in their community. If all black people believe and function as though they are all in one with others (which is how it should be), why insist on personifying these "minority issues" that only exists when created by those who fall victim to them.

I, as part of a vastly legally and morally under recognised minority think that is argument is petty and completely moronic. Creating a situation for you to be and play the victim in is pathetic. Only you can make yourself a victim and this is fashion, simple as that. Fashion is about aesthetics, not racial politics.
 
I personally found this conversation very interesting cause I can´t relate to any of it. In my country there are no "native" black population, I see these images and don´t think of anything racist because there´s no racism (talking strickly about black people) in my country so I don´t live with it or feel it, you know?
 
I cancelled my subscription... Interview was the only magazine I was going to re-subscribe to from 6 magazines I am currently subscribed to but their distribution is beyond awful and I don't have time for chasing up my issues... it can be very frustrating... so I better buy them from news-stands...
 
I cancelled my subscription... Interview was the only magazine I was going to re-subscribe to from 6 magazines I am currently subscribed to but their distribution is beyond awful and I don't have time for chasing up my issues... it can be very frustrating... so I better buy them from news-stands...

I'm getting close to doing the same thing but here in Australia, Borders (the store who carries Interview) has just hiked up their prices by 75% so now one issue is $24.99 which I think is disgusting.
I subscribed to Interview on February 4th this year and my first issue arrived the day before yesterday. Not good. But they have extended my subscription by three months so...
 
I finally got my April issue today & it's practically June. But whatever, As long as it comes I don't care anymore.
 
Review:

Aaron Johnson interviewed by Matthew Vaughn. Photographed by Gregory Harris.

Shepard Fairey interviewed by Iggy Pop. Photographed by Grant Delin.

Karen Elson interviewed by Charlotte Gainsbourg. Photographed by Gregory Harris.

Gildo Zegna interviewed by Peter Marino. Photographed by David Burton.

Madonna interviewed by Gus Van Sant. Photographed by Mert & Marcus. Styled by Ludivine Poiblanc.

Kaws interviewed by Tobey Maguire. Photographed by Craig McDean. Styling by Karl Templer.

David Blaine interviewed by Adam Kimmel. Photographed by Mario Sorrenti. Styling by Karl Templer.

Chloe Moretz, Kiernan Shipka and Nicola Peltz. Photographed by Mikael Jansson. Styling by Karl Templer.

Small features on Josh Hutcherson, Tallulah Riley, Marina And The Diamonds.

'Let's Get Lost'

Models: Daria Werbowy, Oraine Barrett, Raschelle Osbourne, Sedene Blake, Ajak Deng, David Agbodji, Salieu Jalloh, Armando Cabral, Adesuwa Aigheni, Carmelita Mendes, Manuel Ramos, Kelly Moreira, Rafton Glean, Peter Giang, Dorian Cobb, Lisalla Montenegro, Pablo Contreras.
Photographed by Mikael Jansson. Styling by Karl Templer.

'Prepster in the Sun'
Models: Rila, Max Krieger, Mikhael Ayoub, Louis Liu, Tsubasa Watanabe, Patrick Wessel, Ian O'Brien, Shih-han Hsiao, Adam Lundberg.
Photographed by Gregory Harris. Styling by Karen Kaiser.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Aaron Johnson by Greg Harris for Interview Magazine May 2010

I just found this...
So excuse me very much if this is a repost

Actor Aaron Johnson photographed by Greg(ory) Harris and styled by Andrew Davis

aaron-johnson-interview-homotography-1.jpg


aaron-johnson-interview-homotography-2.jpg


aaron-johnson-interview-homotography-3.jpg


source: homotography
 
Aaron Johnson Interview by Matthew Vaughn

Here is the interview

Not every young actor gets to have a breakout year; many who have them don’t survive them. And while the jury is still out on whether or not this is Aaron Johnson’s breakout year—all signs point to yes. These are indeed life-changing times for the 19-year-old Brit. Johnson, a former child actor, has been working for more than a decade, but in the past 12 months, he has completed no fewer than four films, headlined by Matthew Vaughn’s recently released comic book action movie Kick-***, in which he plays a costumed teenage crime fighter, and artist Sam Taylor-Wood’s highly anticipated first feature, Nowhere Boy, in which he stars as a young John Lennon. (The latter film is due out this fall.) But if that isn’t enough to make a young man’s head spin off his shoulders, then consider this: Johnson is also about to become a father. He and his Nowhere Boy director—and fiancée—Taylor-Wood are expecting their first child later this year. Kick-*** director Vaughn recently spoke to the actor.

MATTHEW VAUGHN: When we first met, you were just a young whippersnapper. But within a year, your life has probably changed beyond recognition. Where is your head at right now?

AARON JOHNSON: Quite a lot has changed. I dunno… I’m just happy. I’m sort of more interested in what’s going on in my life rather than my career right now, to be honest. It’s quite exciting because I’ve got two really interesting films out this year, so it’s a good moment to sort of take a break and enjoy life.

VAUGHN: When you rang me up and said that you were having a baby, I felt like it should have shocked me more than it did. I find it intriguing that I wasn’t that surprised.

JOHNSON: Mmm. [laughs] Well, it would shock me if Chris [Mintz-Plasse, Johnson’s co-star in Kick-***] phoned me up and said he’s having a baby. He wouldn’t have a clue what to do.

VAUGHN: I still don’t even have a clue how to make one. You’ve been acting since you were quite young. How do you think you escaped becoming a child actor from hell? Because a lot of kids who’ve been acting since they were 5 or 6 normally turn into really crap actors.

JOHNSON: You’re probably thinking of a lot of American actors there.

VAUGHN: Yeah.

JOHNSON: Or Hollywood actors. I was brought up by a really proud, supportive family, so I have that sort of grounding. When I was about 10, I went off to film a movie in Amsterdam...

VAUGHN: What were you filming in Amsterdam?

JOHNSON: Some film that goes on Sky Movies. It was the first film I ever did. It was called Tom & Thomas [2002]. I played twins who get split up at birth—one goes to an orphanage or something, and the other lives in this beautiful home. But, you know, it was all made with Dutch money, and it basically went nowhere apart from Sky Movies—they quite liked it as a family film to show around Christmastime at nine in the morning. But I was brought up in a village outside of London, and no one really knew what I was doing when I’d go away for that amount of time—and I’d never talk about it. I was never that kid who used to brag about anything.

VAUGHN: How are you going to pick your next movie?

JOHNSON: Wisely. Knowing that I actually just want to be at home for a little while to see Sam’s belly grow, I’ve said no to some things. But the more I’ve said no, the better things have come along.

VAUGHN: I told you to do that, didn’t I?

JOHNSON: Yeah, you did say that. But it’s kind of funny, though, because I’ve never even thought of being in that sort of a position.

VAUGHN: In Hollywood, the power of no is huge. Is there any type of genre you want to try next?

JOHNSON: It’d be great to do some really ****ing great, proper Western. Like a cowboy Western—kind of gritty, you know? Even a Brokeback Mountain [2005]–type one, I wouldn’t mind.

VAUGHN: What was the difference in style between working with me and with Sam?

JOHNSON: That’s a good one. I’ll tell you what the similarities were.

VAUGHN: Did I look at you with loving eyes all day long?

JOHNSON: Well, you’re obviously very different in your ways, but you’re both really sort of family-oriented on set. I mean, you’ve been working with your crew for a long time, and I think you do your best with people who you trust like that.

VAUGHN: Did Sam ever have to bullock you like I did?

JOHNSON: No. There wasn’t so much bullocking going on. I’ll tell you what, there was a lot of—

VAUGHN: —rollicking? [both laugh] Okay. Last question: Of all the living actors right now, whose career would you most like to follow? Just a name—no reason.

JOHNSON: Oooh, ****. That’s a hard one. I try not to feel like I want to follow anyone else.

VAUGHN: I’ll just say a couple of names, and you say yes or no. Daniel Day-Lewis.

JOHNSON: Yes.

VAUGHN: Macaulay Culkin.

JOHNSON: No.

VAUGHN: Daniel Craig.

JOHNSON: I wouldn’t want to be a James Bond.

VAUGHN: Johnny Depp.

JOHNSON: Yes.

VAUGHN: Robert Pattinson.

JOHNSON: No.

VAUGHN: You don’t want to be like Robert Pattinson?

JOHNSON: Is that surprising?

VAUGHN: Chris Mintz-Plasse.

JOHNSON: No.

VAUGHN: Brad Pitt.

JOHNSON: Yes.

VAUGHN: Okay, Tom Cruise.

JOHNSON: No.

VAUGHN: Really? I think Cruise is very underrated. I think he’s a very good actor. I don’t know why people suddenly have this image of him. He’s done some brilliant work.

JOHNSON: Yeah.

VAUGHN: But it’s your decision, not mine. Is anyone going to come on the line and say, “That’s enough”?

JOHNSON: I think that’s enough.

Matthew Vaughn is a writer, director, and producer whose credits include Layer Cake and Snatch.

source: interviewmagazine.com
 
^^^ The last time she blew me away on the cover of a magazine...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,730
Messages
15,125,556
Members
84,433
Latest member
carolreefs
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->