Interview October 2014 : Jessica Chastain by Craig McDean

kokurox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
471
Reaction score
127
dgku20.jpg

2lmuc1j.jpg

35bb6go.jpg

2w1xxc0.jpg


nydailynews.com
 
Well, this is absolutely sensational. Jessica photographs like a dream!
 
Killer cover!!! I'm just somehow bothered with how the t cuts on her face
 
Amazing cover, she looks great on her spread. See the whole content.
 
I can't wait to receive this October issue in early November!
 
This is the worst i have seen her in print!!! Why make her look like a bad copy of Lana Del Rey?!! And she looks just as uncomfortable in this styling. Not impressed.
 
So the price definitely went up to $12 since the Sept issue... :unsure:
 
^Meanwhile, you can buy a subscription for $20 in the US.

It's quite different for an Interview cover, can't remember the last time they did a full body shot. The logo placement bothers me too and all in all I think I need some time to digest it. I hope the contents are just as amazing as last month's though!
 
^Meanwhile, you can buy a subscription for $20 in the US.

It's quite different for an Interview cover, can't remember the last time they did a full body shot. The logo placement bothers me too and all in all I think I need some time to digest it. I hope the contents are just as amazing as last month's though!

Me too!! Thought this would be a close-up. Pleasantly surprised. Love the vintage femme-fatale vibe going on here. The masthead bothers me a bit, but it's fine.
 
I love Jessica. I think she's absolutely gorgeous and a phenomenal actor.

However, I'm not crazy about the cover. I expect more from Interview. And I agree with Miss Dalloway, she looks a bit uncomfortable here.
 
Love Jessica Chastain and these B&W are awesome! Yes, a bit, LDR, but love her too!
 
imo it´s a very striking cover but the composition seems a bit off... is she grabbing a cane? the right leg gets lost between the dress and shadows so that gives the image an "amputated limb" vibe that I don´t like. I think the second image would have been a better cover.
 
more! she's so stunning!!

source interviewmagazine.com
 

Attachments

  • img-jessica-chastain_120259835786.jpg
    img-jessica-chastain_120259835786.jpg
    464.5 KB · Views: 22
  • img-jessica-chastain_120333536369.jpg
    img-jessica-chastain_120333536369.jpg
    322.9 KB · Views: 18
  • img-jessica-chastain_120350650599.jpg
    img-jessica-chastain_120350650599.jpg
    410.9 KB · Views: 15
  • img-jessica-chastain_124718520695.jpg
    img-jessica-chastain_124718520695.jpg
    427 KB · Views: 27
  • img-jessica-chastain_125116993476.jpg
    img-jessica-chastain_125116993476.jpg
    428.5 KB · Views: 24
  • interview5n-2-web.jpg
    interview5n-2-web.jpg
    325.9 KB · Views: 17
  • interview5n-1-web.jpg
    interview5n-1-web.jpg
    251.6 KB · Views: 20
  • interview5n-4-web.jpg
    interview5n-4-web.jpg
    266 KB · Views: 23
  • interview5n-3-web.jpg
    interview5n-3-web.jpg
    186.6 KB · Views: 38
Last edited by a moderator:
imo the editorial is far better than the cover. She looks stunning :smile:
 
when i see this... i'm like "please hire women photographers" !!!

i could care less of supposedly empowered women dressed in sexy lingerie.... AGAIN...
i feel like she's not at ease on most pictures.

i think i would have preferred a cover with sarah paulson, or even mary boone (who is a charming NYC gallerist)...


i'm not liking this. and for a 45th issue anniversary ... well ...

i'm interested in Sarah Paulson, Mary Boone and Cronenberg (i guess this is for the release of his book), and i wanna see the editorials.

but that doesn't smell anniversary issue (so why would you put this on the cover?), and i don't like the cover, nor i care for the subject of the cover (i only saw her in The Help), but since it is a Mindy interview, that might be fun to read.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,964
Messages
15,135,341
Members
84,723
Latest member
Silvercat90
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->