Caffeine said:regarding the comments about usign other people's designs...
Marc uses real people as inspiration, so whatever spirit or some elements of fashion on streets, he will make it and push it to a pure style. So if you dig into all the elements, of course everything has a source. On the constrast, some people designs from nothing or concepts, so maybe something fresh will show up. However, fresh ideas don't always translate to a valid style for real people. So I would say that there are just two kinds of designers, and it's just that they have different ways of design. If Marc can make the styles cool and wearable, then he is a great designer. CDG is great, but what % of clothes can we find from her collections to wear? Then what % of clothes from the Marc collection can we wear? They are simply designers with different purpose/goals.
I know what you mean... and I think you're right in a way about the two sort of designers.
However, Prada would be in the same category as MJ, but her collections are way more distinct imo. I agree with someone who said that MJ's designs lack identity. In contrast to Prada's.
If we are going to accept the two categories of fashion designers, then I don't get the fuss about him even if I put him in the one with the more wearable, "non-conceptual" clothes. Marni has much better designes too imo, but you can still tell her pieces apart even if you saw them amongst 30 other brands.
I don't see how being wearable means that the House should lack in identity. I believe that this happens when you are trying to open up your target group to accommodate all the buyers you can.
I didn't like his vintagey pieces but at least you could tell they were his. Now, his clothes can be worn by anyone with no exception, regardless of the personality and the style. To me this is not fashion. This is mass production and Zara-fication.

ysl..

..

