The Gentlewoman #23 S/S 2021 : Scarlett Johansson by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

The Gentlewoman #23 S/S 2021 : Scarlett Johansson by Inez van Lamsweerde & Vinoodh Matadin

Because the timing is so off what with the current conversation about Asian representation and stereotypes? I know they probably worked on this some time back, but even back then Scarlett already had a troublesome public image.


Fair enough, but as you mentioned, this was probably put together some time (several months) ago and the conversation about anti-Asian hate crimes has really only broken through in the past couple of weeks. To me, it's always seemed incredibly strange that Scarlett gets so much criticism. Online, among the performative woke crowd, she is *constantly* being mocked or treated as though she's exceptionally awful, yet among the general populous and seemingly among her peers, she's incredibly well-liked.

She played the role of a Cyborg in "Ghost in the Shell". The Japanese creator of the original character said her casting was unproblematic since she was playing a machine, yet the twitter mob decided to spin it as though she were public enemy #1 for being in the film. Meanwhile, Emma Stone played an Asian woman in a film (not just took a role originally meant for an Asian actress, it was referenced in the film that she was Asian) and where is the backlash against her? There was a little, when the film was released, but it quickly faded. That's far, far, more egregious. What about all the white actors playing Egyptians in numerous movies, even recently? Scarlett's casting is by far the least offensive, in my opinion, because though it would have been culturally appropriate to cast a Japanese actress in the role, seeing as "Ghost in the Shell" is a Japanese creation originally, the character Scarlett played was not specifically an Asian woman. And she and her casting certainly didn't enforce any negative stereotypes.

What are her other controversies? Yes, she was going to play a (likely) Trans man in a film, but decided against it after the casting was criticized. So.... she did the right thing? And up until a few years ago, almost all Trans characters in film were portrayed by cisgender actors. And they won Oscars and Emmys and Golden Globes and everyone praised it as progressive. The needle moved very quickly, Then she gave an interview where she said ideally any actor could play any role, but she understands that since opportunities aren't equitable for minority actors, she understands why she shouldn't be playing trans characters, etc. What on earth is wrong with that statement? Nothing, imo. Yet people decided to cherry pick portions of the quote to make her sound foolish. Lastly, she said she believes Woody Allen did not molest Dylan Farrow. He was not convicted. It's ok to have differing opinions on the matter, especially if you actually know the parties involved. In my mind, her not backing down and throwing Woody under the bus just shows that she has more conviction, more character, and is less of a hypocrite than 99% of Hollywood. The accusations were made in the early 90s, and since then virtually every A-lister has worked with him, helped award him, (not to mention worked with, awarded, and advocated for Roman Polanski), yet suddenly they change their tune.
 
Woody Allen optics are questionable sis... We can see that he's a weirdo bc he married his own step daughter, that is pretty damn sick. but that means most of hollywood is cancelled which is fine with me because I care about fashion and none of them serve so bye, lets get a new crowd in here and see what they do. most of society is totally done with celebrity anyway so hollywood is gonna go whether they like it or not.

The makeup is really really bad. Her nose is too pointy to be all up in the lens like that
 
Last edited:
Woody Allen optics are questionable sis... We can see that he's a weirdo bc he married his own step daughter, that is pretty damn sick. but that means most of hollywood is cancelled which is fine with me because I care about fashion and none of them serve so bye, lets get a new crowd in here and see what they do. most of society is totally done with celebrity anyway so hollywood is gonna go whether they like it or not.


Really dislike even having to “defend” Woody, since I find him creepy and obnoxious, but he did not marry his stepdaughter. Soon-Yi is the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow and André Previn, and though Mia and Woody were in a relationship, they were not married and they did not live together. He was not a father figure to her and he was not married to her mother. Soon-Yi herself said she and Allen did not interact during her childhood. Is it weird and messy to date and marry the adult daughter of your former girlfriend? Absolutely. Is it illegal or does it indicate you’re a pedophile? No. Soon-Yi is an accomplished, highly educated woman who began an affair with Woody when she was 22 and they’ve now been together for 29 years and have 2 children together. To frame her life as just “she married her stepdad” is inaccurate and insulting.
 
Fair enough, but as you mentioned, this was probably put together some time (several months) ago and the conversation about anti-Asian hate crimes has really only broken through in the past couple of weeks. To me, it's always seemed incredibly strange that Scarlett gets so much criticism. Online, among the performative woke crowd, she is *constantly* being mocked or treated as though she's exceptionally awful, yet among the general populous and seemingly among her peers, she's incredibly well-liked.

She played the role of a Cyborg in "Ghost in the Shell". The Japanese creator of the original character said her casting was unproblematic since she was playing a machine, yet the twitter mob decided to spin it as though she were public enemy #1 for being in the film. Meanwhile, Emma Stone played an Asian woman in a film (not just took a role originally meant for an Asian actress, it was referenced in the film that she was Asian) and where is the backlash against her? There was a little, when the film was released, but it quickly faded. That's far, far, more egregious. What about all the white actors playing Egyptians in numerous movies, even recently? Scarlett's casting is by far the least offensive, in my opinion, because though it would have been culturally appropriate to cast a Japanese actress in the role, seeing as "Ghost in the Shell" is a Japanese creation originally, the character Scarlett played was not specifically an Asian woman. And she and her casting certainly didn't enforce any negative stereotypes.

What are her other controversies? Yes, she was going to play a (likely) Trans man in a film, but decided against it after the casting was criticized. So.... she did the right thing? And up until a few years ago, almost all Trans characters in film were portrayed by cisgender actors. And they won Oscars and Emmys and Golden Globes and everyone praised it as progressive. The needle moved very quickly, Then she gave an interview where she said ideally any actor could play any role, but she understands that since opportunities aren't equitable for minority actors, she understands why she shouldn't be playing trans characters, etc. What on earth is wrong with that statement? Nothing, imo. Yet people decided to cherry pick portions of the quote to make her sound foolish. Lastly, she said she believes Woody Allen did not molest Dylan Farrow. He was not convicted. It's ok to have differing opinions on the matter, especially if you actually know the parties involved. In my mind, her not backing down and throwing Woody under the bus just shows that she has more conviction, more character, and is less of a hypocrite than 99% of Hollywood. The accusations were made in the early 90s, and since then virtually every A-lister has worked with him, helped award him, (not to mention worked with, awarded, and advocated for Roman Polanski), yet suddenly they change their tune.

It seems to me the entire basis of your counter-argument relies on whataboutism, King?
Anyway, I don't find it strange at all that she's getting constant criticism. In fact I think the reason why people are always on her neck is because she continues to get rewarded despite her flippant responses to justified outrage. Vogue covers, Oscar noms, her own franchise, all of this happened after the controversies when others have suffered far worse. There's clearly a very big and profitable publicity machine behind her.
You should just read the cover feature, it's up on The Gentlewoman's website. They're putting her forward as a champion for women. I actually find that more egregious than anything. Of all the actresses out there, they really had to go with her?

And it seems Penny is not all that innocent because the only comment she bothered to respond to with a lighting emoji was someone who said something to effect of '(The Gentlewoman is) the only magazine who doesn't call people out, but call people in'.
 
It seems to me the entire basis of your counter-argument relies on whataboutism, King?


I mean, if you ignore my points about the fact she never actually played an Asian woman, didn’t wind up playing a Trans man, that some of her infamous quotes were taken out of context, etc. than sure. The concepts of value, justice, equality, representation, and fairness all rely on comparison so it’s more than reasonable to compare her perceived transgressions with those of her peers who don’t receive nearly the amount of criticism.
 
At least is something different, not your typical toned down makeup celebrity beauty shot.
 
It's a beautiful portrait of Scarlett, but the makeup is too risky.
 
Sad magazine, sad cover, desperate to be "COOL" but end of day so wrong. Ugh, makes me sick
 
$46 to pre-order and have it shipped. Such a scam, the last issue I bought on newsstands was under $20 I think
 





source: instagram/inezandvinoodh

It’s all a bit underwhelming to be honest.
 
Two more:




source: instagram/inezandvinoodh
 
There's something about the nose that bothers me but I still like how dramatic it all looks.
 
I never thought I’d say this but this editorial is bad!
poor Scarlett. another huge flop from I&V but considering their latest Chanel campaign I’m not at all surprised.
what a shame.
 
This is cheap and tacky. Maybe I&V should take a sabbatical and refocus because it's been a long time since they shot something good. At this point it's just the power of networking and politics that keep them afloat.
 
they’re selling this for only $8.99 on Amazon with free 2 day shipping. Crazy, considering back issues sometimes go for hundreds on Amazon
 
they’re selling this for only $8.99 on Amazon with free 2 day shipping. Crazy, considering back issues sometimes go for hundreds on Amazon

Thanks for posting! Some of the other, non-Amazon sellers have other magazines cheaper than on newsstands, also with free shipping
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,476
Messages
15,263,222
Members
88,503
Latest member
Rutambhara
Back
Top