^ I sort of agree with you, but that's really the problem with most celebrity magazine features today. Most magazines just don't seem to like to go for less familiar or unused faces in their celebrity features just because they're likely not to sell as well as Kate Winslet -- a beautiful woman with a decent, and more importantly, famous and (for whatever reason) revered career. And I wouldn't have so much of a problem with that, if what they did with Kate (or any other familiar face for that matter) was at least sometimes something new, different, maybe even a little challenging (at least to her "fans"), whether it be in the shape of an unusual photoshoot or interview that didn't absolutely reek of project promotion. But that's always an unsafe choice to make, and a needless one when the reality they see is that most people only buy the magazine because Kate is in it in pretty pictures, and those who subscribe to UK Vogue do so for other reasons than Kate Winslet and are anyway more likely to subscribe to it alone or perhaps another magazine or two on the side than to so actively follow all fashion and magazines as to get tired of the repeat performances, both in UK Vogue and magazines in general.