US Vogue March 2006 : Natalie Portman by Craig McDean

I'm so bored of the Caroline/Gemma/Lily Aryan Princess issues. It's enough.
 
mizenkay said:
:lol:

thank you!

US Vogue is such a snoozefest - same old models every time!

boring and a bit fascist, if you ask me!

Agreed completely! :flower:

I doubt Anna Wintour knows the meanings of original or creative.
 
masquerade said:
i dont get this whole animal friendly thing. they wont wear leather but they will wear silk and wool

i have no idea how silk is made but wool doesnt kill the sheep when it's sheared, so thats probably why they have no problems wearing wool

at least i think ... :unsure:
 
^well isn't it a bit contradictory then? cos they're willing to wear silk but the process of getting silk kills the larvae..................
 
im pretty sure boiling is involved. or it was at least in the old days. im in a class on the history and culture of the silk road in china and we had a reading that breifly mentioned chinese silk killed the larvae but indian silk didnt. but this was a llooooooooooong time ago, so i dont know.

im not judging, ive always just wondered about vegan stances on it. i dont know anytihng about veganism really, and ive seen vegans wear silk, so i wanted to know
 
March 2006 US Vogue

Image pulled from eBay

2006038um.jpg
 
It's actually not that bad and I like the colour combinations. The pose could have been different given her hair.... maybe a little more modern or edgy.
 
I Love it! I'm so happy it wasn't Aniston.
I adore Natalie and can't wait to get this issue.

Thanks for posting the cover dfl-001!
 
I just checked ebay and the March issue is up to $61.00!

OMG!
 
oh man, can you say airbrushing. i have to see it in person, but it doesnt even look like her
 
stephiev said:
I just checked ebay and the March issue is up to $61.00!

OMG!
oh man, just wait a couple weeks and it will be everywhere
 
I'm not sure... :huh: Althugh I love that dress (Prada?) I agree they could have gone more edgy. That's what pisses me off about Vogue US. They never take chances.
 
stephiev said:
I just checked ebay and the March issue is up to $61.00!

OMG!

:shock: :shock: :shock: I wouldn't pay $0.01 for anything with her on it, especially US Vogue.

Sadly I'm subscribed for now. :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
bad cover, again......her hair is far too dark, she doesn't look beautiful at all....
 
i don't know, guys, i think it's pretty gorgeous. not the best, but definitely a step up from february. and its over 600 pages!!! :woot:
 
Natalie Portman is BEAUTIFUL... they could have done more with her in this cover... It doesn't do anything for me.

And off topic, but: why do people bid for these magazines on e-bay... so they can be the first person to have it or something?:unsure:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->