my first reaction was "pilati gone nuts" but a second CLOSER look makes me think this may not be that bad IF it's taken piece by piece:
no to the pants (or at least it's execution, as the idea of the wider silhouette is good and suits pilati's style very well), the shoes are a terrible accident, and the see-through knits are even worse than the shoes.
yes to jackets, shorter-wider lapels, the short sleeves on the black coat, the gorgeous fabrics, the inviting palette...
PS: on a side note the "pilati wouldnt wear this comment" made me think too of that pic in the black outfit, but most importantly it made me think of his looks when he first got to saint laurent. his perfect hair, his beautiful navy blazer, his pocket square and his white trousers: the quintessence of italian menswear much?
fun seeing his own style evolve and comparing it to the image he projects to the brand. fun, but i kind of miss it!
The pants- exactly who'd wear those pants, I really wonder. Maybe depending on the city, I dunno. The shoes are painful just to look at. When it comes to the long knits, I mean, we know we get better goth around (i.e. Ann Demeulemeester, Rick Owens etc etc), I don't go to YSL to look goth, huh? And that's not the only way to dress young. Shorter-wider lapels and the short sleeves on the black coat will look totally out of place in any given city. If I want innovative fabric, I'd go to Prada- his mentor.
I think Pilati's earlier look was more Italian x Saint Laurent, he was channeling Saint Laurent's own look with the pocketsquare and wht trousers also, which I sorely miss too. Plus, we don't always agree with Mme Menkes. This is painful and the least likable collection from him at YSL ever.
Last edited by a moderator: