mikeijames
no tom ford, no thanks.
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2003
- Messages
- 5,879
- Reaction score
- 8
Thank you taz, for the archival input. I honestly don't see what's not to like about a classic collection with outstanding tailoring. The shapes are loose, easy, yet well-structured. The white pieces are extremely pretty and feminine without being frivolous. And what's the deal with being judgmental over *one* skirt? Geez, didn't Stella McCartney do fruits before for Chloe, without incurring the same wrath? Did people ask for her head to roll off the Chloe pedestal for putting a PINEAPPLE on her blouse? It seems really prejudiced to damn the entire collection for one item, and it's not even an awful skirt, just a print/pastiche.
as i recall, stella mccartney never presented the fruit at chloe in any sort of serious way. if pilati inserted these strawberries as some wild sexually perverse and totally obvious joke like stella did, then he should say so. otherwise, they accomplished nothing in this collection. this collection could have used a healthy dose of editing.


, Yves himself had shown a fruit bunch 8 years ago in his couture show & there was no problem at all. it is only a repeated motif, just like the Star collection that Pilati did 2 years ago, YSL culture is full of repeated motifs like lips, wheat, moons, stars, roses, lilies, ribbons, hearts, fruits, ploka dots, bayadere lines & some of Henry Mattise patterns....