Phuel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 5,747
- Reaction score
- 8,791
^and i am such addict for scarves too!
you know i see it more as campy in the way of sort of an leftbank opium den bohemian 60's....
I don't see camp either, Scott. There's too much work put into these designs for me to dismiss his style as camp. ( I appreciate how tightly edited a collection it is-- instead of a hundred looks like Armani that makes you tired quickly.) It's beautiful-- but it just doesn't work, for me.
I do think Haider is immensely talented, and his inspiration seems to be the image of the intellectual, gentleman traveler. I get that. But when you look at Dries' collection, whose inspiration seems to also have sprung from similar references: romantic and modern-- perhaps a young, elegant Baryshnikov as a macho matador in a ballet, I can't help but think how Dries succeeds so wildly with his collection that I, and apparently many others, also connect with, while Haider appears to have... not connected his inspiration with a sense of practicality, at all.
So yes, it is very self-indulgent, as you suggested. I don't doubt his sincerity with this collection, it's just that it's too precious to me, whereas Dries' men are so effortless. And precious fashion for men totally turns me off.
I guess I just much prefer Dries' unfettered, dangling strappy shoulder pieces to Haider's carefully flowing scarves, which yes-- I can't unsee Steven Tyler in every one of those looks now