susie_bubble
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Messages
- 4,001
- Reaction score
- 2
I like the way the sequinned pieces throw the collection a little of course. The bold colours work surprisingly well too!
Mutterlein said:I think, as a hypothetical Sander customer, I would look to each new collection as a chance to stock up or add to my wardrobe. Gradually picking out pieces that I can always count on and keep well after their seasonal "expiration". This is opposed to looking for the new trends each season and staying "hip". These clothes in that sense are unfashionable because they won't ever go out of style as they were never really in style. I think that is how Simons is re-defining the brand. It's one of the only truly modern labels if you look at it in that regard.
disco54 said:...plus the clothes are too mechanical
Uh yeah. The same goes for Vuitton, Dior, Chanel, Gucci, Givenchy, Yves Saint Laurent, Lanvin, Balenciaga, Calvin Klein, Bill Blass...the list goes on. Your point?disco54 said:another thing they are not even designed by jil sander , yet her name is still being used...
I still find his aesthetic better suited to menswear but the shoes and bags are great. Why didn't he offer the same experiment in materials he offered in the SS07 Men's collection? Maybe the rest of the collection is more interesting...need to see all of it.Mutterlein said:Yeah, I can't imagine many regular customers going for the suits. But I don't think that's what the collection is about.
I think, as a hypothetical Sander customer, I would look to each new collection as a chance to stock up or add to my wardrobe. Gradually picking out pieces that I can always count on and keep well after their seasonal "expiration". This is opposed to looking for the new trends each season and staying "hip". These clothes in that sense are unfashionable because they won't ever go out of style as they were never really in style. I think that is how Simons is re-defining the brand. It's one of the only truly modern labels if you look at it in that regard.