John Galliano - Designer | Page 56 | the Fashion Spot

John Galliano - Designer

Some fashion philanthropist should buy it and donate it to a museum. Its a symphony of seam work with gorgeous draped sleeves and a sassy patch pocket. The jacket front being integrated into the yoke is exquisite.
 
Last edited:
Some fashion philanthropist should buy it and donate it to a museum. Its a symphony of seam work with gorgeous draped sleeves and a sassy patch pocket. The jacket front being integrated into the yoke is exquisite.
then we see the eyesores from Chanel. Serious...it is so sad.
 
I wonder if John is fully retired or if he will step into another role the moment the non-compete clause I assume he has expires ? Anyone have any info on what he is doing ? I am curious.
He maybe finished, would love to no. The world has changed so much . But he is still loved.
 
I actually think he’s more essential now than ever. Louis Vuitton could truly benefit from having him replace Nicolas. The younger generation connects with timeless talents like John - and they already respond to Pharrell. NG isnt connecting since its all concept, no feeling. The younger crowd isn’t connecting because there’s nothing emotionally alive in the work.

I think the world is ready for highly unique detailed clothing again. The new luxury customer doesnt understand that 00s look of putting rochebobois furniture in a traditional French apartment. They grew up with a Kartell chair in their 17th century apartment. They want reimagined claw foot chairs in their 17th century apartment that look and fit the apartment is sincere and not ironic. John is the perfect person for the job.
 
Last edited:
What happened to his eponymous label? They were wonderfully extravagant collections. I remembered it again when I found a shirt I had kept with its tags and receipt from 2007. I know Bill Gaytten took over when he was fired. I looked and there's not even a website? Is it discontinued?
 
What happened to his eponymous label? They were wonderfully extravagant collections. I remembered it again when I found a shirt I had kept with its tags and receipt from 2007. I know Bill Gaytten took over when he was fired. I looked and there's not even a website? Is it discontinued?
Its all a shame LVMH is just holding it for the biggest bidder
 
Does anybody remember his old menswear shows? I didn’t care for it then, but with the passage of time, I can appreciate it for the fun and frivolity of it all.


Ehhhhh JPG did this better. Let’s not kid ourselves and think this was entirely unique. Not a dig at you or anything by any means. His menswear fit in really well with the going ons at the time, probably why it was so forgettable.

JPG, McQueen, DSquared2, D&G etc succeeded in these tropes in a much more nuanced, interesting, sellable and perverse way. This just looks like an exercise in styling.
 

AFP Published December 16, 2025

John Galliano’s former lawyer convicted on appeal of embezzling the designer’s funds​

John Galliano's former lawyer was given a two-year suspended prison sentence on appeal on Tuesday, identical to the term imposed at first instance, for misappropriating funds from the designer's bank accounts and those of one of his companies.
45666.jpg
Stéphane Zerbib (left) and his former employer, fashion designer John Galliano. AFP

The Paris Court of Appeal upheld the June 2023 judgment of the criminal court, which had found Stéphane Zerbib guilty of breach of trust totalling 856,500 euros between 2008 and 2011, and of the use of forged documents.

John Galliano lodged a complaint in April 2011 against his former lawyer, accusing him of misappropriating around three million euros by withdrawing cash or making bank transfers without his knowledge.


The designer had just been dismissed by the House of
Dior after hurling antisemitic insults at patrons in a Paris bar in February 2011, and was undergoing treatment for his "addictions" at a rehabilitation clinic in Arizona.

At the hearing, Stéphane Zerbib denied any fraudulent withdrawals from the accounts of his former client and from one of his companies, Cheyenne Freedom.

The Court of Appeal also upheld a one-year suspended prison sentence for Stéphane Zerbib's wife, Danielle Nahon, a legal adviser who also advised John Galliano at the time, for breach of trust, use of forged documents and unlawfully holding herself out as a lawyer.

The lawyer and his wife were ordered to jointly pay John Galliano 145,000 euros in material damages and 5,000 euros in moral damages, as well as 606,605 euros to the company Cheyenne Freedom.
 
Ehhhhh JPG did this better. Let’s not kid ourselves and think this was entirely unique. Not a dig at you or anything by any means. His menswear fit in really well with the going ons at the time, probably why it was so forgettable.

JPG, McQueen, DSquared2, D&G etc succeeded in these tropes in a much more nuanced, interesting, sellable and perverse way. This just looks like an exercise in styling.
True, his menswear is so bad, he couldn’t compete with Lee in this category. Dolce Gabbana did it better and with more ease!
 
The Paris Court of Appeal upheld the June 2023 judgment of the criminal court, which had found Stéphane Zerbib guilty of breach of trust totalling 856,500 euros between 2008 and 2011, and of the use of forged documents.

John Galliano lodged a complaint in April 2011 against his former lawyer, accusing him of misappropriating around three million euros by withdrawing cash or making bank transfers without his knowledge.
OMG...the "rant" was Feb 2011?
Was it because he was upset by this whole embezzlement scheme? If so, Dior really did him dirty. And John never talked about this in public or was it under publicized?
 
Ehhhhh JPG did this better. Let’s not kid ourselves and think this was entirely unique. Not a dig at you or anything by any means. His menswear fit in really well with the going ons at the time, probably why it was so forgettable.

JPG, McQueen, DSquared2, D&G etc succeeded in these tropes in a much more nuanced, interesting, sellable and perverse way. This just looks like an exercise in styling.
I often talk about the power of identification with men.
I think that men loves to see what they can relate to. John had both the technical capacities and the imagination to build a strong menswear brand but all the brands you mentioned presented a relatable vision of men. Nobody has to do imagine how they would look wearing Dsquared2, D&G, JPG or McQueen. The runway show give it away and it’s readable enough to imagine integrating something into your wardrobe.

It’s totally the opposite with Galliano. Too flamboyant and maybe not enough subtle in the homo-erotism in which a lot of those brands evolved.

OMG...the "rant" was Feb 2011?
Was it because he was upset by this whole embezzlement scheme? If so, Dior really did him dirty. And John never talked about this in public or was it under publicized?

Galliano had a really wild lifestyle during his whole tenure at Dior. It took a turn when Steven died. And Steven died in 2007.
The lawyer likely started to took advantage from the moment his client started to go really off the rails.
And I think John renewed his contract with Dior in 2006.
After the scandal, John went to rehab and so he probably started to pay attention to his money when Dior fired him.
And Dior was doing very well after a few slipping seasons when he was fired. So there was probably a lot of money in his company.

When you are that rich unfortunately, even more when it comes to creative, you don’t really pay attention to your money as long as there’s something. So you trust your lawyers and others. And in this case, they took advantage of John.
 
Oh my god thats horrible. I saw in episode of understitch, and I know that John was very bad with money and business.He was a great creative director sharp on what sold, but he was bad with money. .But , this is horrible , they took advantage of him. Oh my how horrible.
 
I got to realize that what Dior did was to kick him when he was down. What a generational talent. This whole ordeal must have hurt him so much.
I don't agree he got kicked when he was down by Dior owner, he is a hired contractor/employ when you do things to damage your reputation and the business of the one that hired you it's fair to cut the cord.

If people get fired for lots of reasons even high profile ones, this is no difference they helped/forced him go to rehab before already.

What i do see as mean or greedy from Dior owner is to not sell his name back to him...but stupid of John to sell it off in the first place.

The irony of the story is his lawyer that stole his money is jewish and said at the time he believed in being so to give him a chance to fair trial and that john was not anti semitic. (something that knowing people that worked with him tell lots of other stories on his lashing on fat woman or ethnic groups so this rant was not new around his circles)

People confuse /assume that because someone has chinese vases in their house they would like Chinese people to live next to them.
As John pulls form every ethnic nation by default means he is accepting of the people that it belongs to.
Same with some other very heavy users of ethic esthetics creative designers out there that in the end have a colonial appreciation for far away lands.

merry xmass
 
It’s the cycle of enabling an enabler and the easily enabled. Had he not been the way that he was, we probably wouldn’t have gotten the collections we did from at both Dior and his namesake.

If not just for finances, it offered fantastic PR for the brand and A LOT of event dressing. With fantastic campaigns too and hit items. They brought in money when it was hot, he used that money how he wanted and he knew for a good while that he was able to get away with it because they needed him as much as he needed them. Plus without the money, there’d be no Galliano the label at the time. He just wasn’t smart about it like Karl was, or even McQueen to a lesser extent. He reined the collections in when demanded by the suits but then he’d have an explosive burst of a season or two then be asked to rein it in again. It was tumultuous for both, and incredibly toxic.

He could have left much earlier. Probably should have as well but he didn’t. It was a rather Stockholm Syndrome like relationship until the suits got tired of it. His outburst I don’t want to say was calculated, but I think many saw it coming. And when that happens there isn’t much else you can do about it which is sad.
 
I think we have to remember something. The fashion industry, the position and kind of scrutiny (that is still not very present tbh) on fashion designers didn’t exist back then.

Fashion designers are creatives so they can be irrational and they evolve in a world where a lot of things are irrational and when you are successful, you can easily be isolated and believe your own hype.

And John had a lot of hype. So suddenly when your ego which was already high experience wealth, a luxury lifestyle, you can easily lose yourself.

And we have to remember that at that time, the figure of a designer was a Couturier, an artist. And people are always enablers of artists. They can do substances, trash hotel rooms, be rude, be nasty. At they end, they deliver a collection, everybody scream genius and people believe it’s part of the game.

I mean I grew up watching tv understanding that YSL was sick making dresses. Every interview of him, he was talking about the torture of having to make those dresses to discover later that the man was just and addict and was probably high looking like a vegetable on tv.

It’s quite easy when in a studio, the designer is not coming often. By 2010/2011, the people at LVMH were probably already used to having reports of John missing at the office, episodes more or less details of what he was doing. But the man always got it together, he always took a bow, did his performance and it worked until it didn’t.

About the business, we have to remember that John like Marc already had existing brands that didn’t worked for a longtime before coming to LVMH. So it’s easy to understand why someone who was struggling for years would accept the injection of cash and ressources from LVMH. And we have to be honest, it’s difficult to be involved in equal capacities, even when your name is on the door, without the same ressources when you are used to the very best.

John Galliano as a brand never made money ever. Maybe John made the mistake of not differentiate Dior and his own brand enough. The other problem was that during the crazy years, the business model ultimately hurt his brand. John Galliano was supported through licences when Dior was all integrated. And they quickly stopped having strategy. And at that time Christian Lacroix was also struggling and ultimately sold.

LVMH are petty and I suspect that they wants to make money out of a potential sale due to the fact that they consider having invested too much on it. They would probably sell it more than it really worth.

Karl was maybe more clever about it because he was on his own and was dependent only in him on his career. He fought to keep his name. Karl Lagerfeld the brand never really took off. He used the collaboration and licenses strategy also and he had better lawyers who made great contracts that could protect him the person separately from his brand.

I think John may have been a bit naive in the beginning and wanted to be part of the establishment of Paris fashion. Lee was a bit more rebel. And ultimately he met Tom Ford who as a designer, had also at heart the interest of a designer.

The fact that someone like Nicolas who in 2000 was far from rich compared to some of his contemporaries, was able to have 10% of Balenciaga would have never been possible at LVMH…Or even Kering (PPR) if there wasn’t a designer up high.

The sad thing is that all the trademark possible for John to operate with his name are owned by LVMH. He can’t even comeback with just Galliano. It’s the same thing with Marc but if Marc wants a challenge he will likely go to another house.

Maybe John should approach Delphine. She worked closely with him. But he is not getting younger either…
 
just to remember john had substance abuse problems before he got the dior job ...it was part of the party hard work late scene not only related to fashion or a big brand job and it still exist

Yves is a similar nightlife gay sexy and drugs creative while Karl watches and left the party on time


some creatives are more rebellious and other more nerdy

its all human nature nobody is perfect.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,598
Messages
15,308,536
Members
89,621
Latest member
Mashasan
Back
Top