I don't dislike the cover, but it just seems designed to be 'neon' on the newsstand above all else, with lines about 'the dark romance of modern florals' written in dayglo orange. While there's nothing wrong with a magazine trying to make itself stand out, Karlie's face could be blanked out and it would lose no impact; I don't feel a connection with the person on the cover, all I see is the clashing colours and patterns.
The editorials are decent enough – I find there's something especially satisfying about the images in New Noir. In scans, some of the poses in Midas Touch seemed stilted to me, yet the actual images offer the opportunity to admire the detailing in the dresses instead.
But Dark Blooms with Lara... the efforts to make the landscape look 'autumn' seem horribly artificial to my eyes, the glow of the setting sun coming straight from studio-strength lighting. Perhaps there's supposed to be a sense of dissonance in it, but the shot where she's standing in front of a tree with lots of orange foliage – it's actually an evergreen that's half-dead, but they get Lara to stand in front of it, as if any old tree with brown leaves will look like autumn. No, it's a dying leylandii, and the whole thing seems very cheap and forced to me, especially when a landscape at any time of year will offer plenty of natural drama if you work with it. You don't have to shoehorn the world into looking like autumn when it's not.
The interviews are a bit incestuous – Kate Phelan's house, Samantha Cameron's career – and the beauty section seems like a feeble afterthought, so I didn't mind buying this issue, but I'll not be keeping it around for long.