The cover itself I don't mind,
I mind that she's on the cover in the first place.
Firstly, the reason Kate Upton became the "hottest (as IF.) supermodel in the world" is because shes related to billionaires. I don't think she's pretty in the slightest. I think what I'm going to start doing now is covering the faces of every magazine I end up getting with a model I hate on it. (I've got Style magazine Spring 2013 all ready for that.) The fact that she managed to get this baffles me. She's just another model that nobody cares about. She hasn't walked a SINGLE show (except for swimsuit shows. I mean, really?), so why is she being called a supermodel? She got two swimsuit editions? Big whoop. It's bad enough that the quality of content in Vogue has dwindled down from daring, beautiful editorials to bringing us inside the private lives/homes of rich people nobody cares about EVERY MONTH. People have been asking for models on the cover for years and years and years. What do we get? Kate Moss, Gisele Bundchen, and Christy Turlington. Not a single up-and-comer. There are people who have worked for this cover for years. I'm not even Karlie's biggest fan but how many editorials for Vogue does she have? She was profiled in the SEPTEMBER ISSUE almost FOUR YEARS AGO. Where is her cover? If there is any model who deserves a cover it's her. Not some wannabe who got famous for being on the cover of a swimsuit magazine and doing some stupid dance for Terry Richardson.
She's just some girl who calls herself a model because she wants to become a big, famous actress. Even though her acting would be more on par with a p*rno than it would with the Oscars.
(It's things like this that make me angry. Well, one of many things.)