US Vogue June 2013 : Kate Upton by Mario Testino | Page 8 | the Fashion Spot

US Vogue June 2013 : Kate Upton by Mario Testino

I have no doubt that Kate isn't really accepted by the fashion crowd because fashion people don't like healthy, bubbly.

I think it's more fashion does not like the super ordinary. Her type is quite common. I still cannot recognise her face anywhere, she looks like all pretty blondes in the media and people complain about blandness in fashion? This girl is the epitome of bland.
I simply do not get it.
 
^ I'm pretty sure that story was made up by those pathetic gossip columnists. Why would Anna Wintour make her jump through hoops to attend the Met gala but then go on and give her the cover of Vogue after less than a handful of appearances in the magazine? It doesn't make any sense. It's just some crazy story promulgated by the media. I have no doubt that Kate isn't really accepted by the fashion crowd because fashion people don't like healthy, bubbly types, but Anna Wintour would not allow her to be on the cover if she didn't approve of her. Anna said herself that being on the cover of Vogue has to mean something and is a validation of a woman's place, not just in fashion but in society and in pop culture.

And American Vogue is catered to a commercial audience, KU is a commercial girl with a face and figure that everyone appreciates. People need to inderstand that you don't have to be a Sasha Pivovarova to be a model, and KU isn't exactly blande when it comes to her appearance, her beauty is so natural it makes the photographers job a lot easier not to have to touch her up, unlike other models. Karlie and Joan are indeed great models but the last thing Ms wintour wants on her plate is a bunch of hate mail because she has casted a less-than-average body figured model onto the cover with the exception of Kate Moss and their model issues. Wintour wants positive feedback from her audience, the American consumer is very, VERY sensitive to the weight issue, sad but true. The choice to place Kate on the cover was a smart choice, and I can live with that.
 
^ironically Kate has the body very few can achieve without surgery. Not with the strongest will and determination in the world can a woman will herself to a bust like that.

Which is probably part of the reason her chest plays a small role on the cover and in the editorial.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The cover is fine. I've never been a Kate upton hater but I have to say her being on the cover of AMERICAN vogue initially baffled me. Then I realized you cannot compare Kate and Karlie.. they are both models but they are entirely different kinds of models. Kate is a celebrity model. Whats the last big campaign she has had or the last runway show she has walked? I can't recall.. but she is nonetheless a hot commodity. Can't hate on her for cashing in on what she has going on.. even if it is initially baffling
 
If you read a bit more about Upton it makes total sense why Anna would like her.

Despite how she looks, she's not some Anna Nicole Smith ex-stripper-type who hit it lucky. She's one of the heirs to the Whirlpool fortune and was a champion equestrian! She's pretty "upper crust," which is what Anna likes. :lol:

(If Carine was still at Vogue Paris, she would have had about 4 covers by now.)

So true, I actually take her CR Fashion Book cover as a VP one :lol:
 
I think one of the reasons it's slightly baffling (at least to me) that Kate got the cover, is that outside of the US, she is literally unknown.

I know US Vogue obviously caters to America but at the same it's very "international". Even in their previous June or July issues the cover stars at least had some international mass market/commercial media success. Last year had the Olympics special (Serena Williams is well known enough) and Emma Stone. The previous year had Penelope Cruz and Emma Watson - both still very recognizable. I think they had Blake Lively as well one year and even she is well known enough you see her in Gossip Girl and other films.

Apart from that the cover is actually quite good.
 
Is this girl really happening in the US? She's certainly not happening anywhere else, and by God they are trying.

It's absolutely baffling for me what she's doing on the cover of Vogue, What is the appeal? She's your run of the mill page 3 girl, well to tell the truth I've seen page 3 girls more interesting looking. And it's not like this glamour model material turned serious model is a new concept.


she has done Bazaar and Esquire Brazil, Vogue Italia, UK vogue...I dont call that not happening elsewhere:p
 
^ironically Kate has the body very few can achieve without surgery. Not with the strongest will and determination in the world can a woman will herself to a bust like that.

Which is probably part of the reason her chest plays a small role on the cover and in the editorial.

I'm in personal fitness, very many don't try hard enough to put in the effort to do it, or they're simply not doing it the right way, I believe Kate didn't settle for surgery just to obtain a physique like that, it's utter nonsense and it just goes to show how lazy or how stupid people are when it comes to proper exercise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think one of the reasons it's slightly baffling (at least to me) that Kate got the cover, is that outside of the US, she is literally unknown.

I know US Vogue obviously caters to America but at the same it's very "international". Even in their previous June or July issues the cover stars at least had some international mass market/commercial media success. Last year had the Olympics special (Serena Williams is well known enough) and Emma Stone. The previous year had Penelope Cruz and Emma Watson - both still very recognizable. I think they had Blake Lively as well one year and even she is well known enough you see her in Gossip Girl and other films.

Apart from that the cover is actually quite good.

I´d say that any model (other than the supermodels) is pretty much unknown to the regular public so it doesn´t matter in this case if KU is known outside the US.
Movies and TV actresses are known worldwide because the general public is more interested in that form of entertainment.

This is a fashion forum and of course everyone here has a minimum of knowledge in models, labels and designers but let´s not forget this is small bubble in comparison to sports and movies...
 
she has the face of a model who can be in fashion magazines and reminiscent of the 80s models with those cute and gorgeous looks you see in elle, mademoiselle or glamor. but lord she doesn't have a swimsuit body other than being tall and big busted the rest of her proportions and tone is off
 
The photos from her ed have been posted on vogue.com for like 3 days, and nobody can quit bitching long enough to post them..
 
How in the world is this girl 20 years old?? This cover and editorial ages her by a good 15 years.
 
she has done Bazaar and Esquire Brazil, Vogue Italia, UK vogue...I dont call that not happening elsewhere:p

You prove my point and like I said Some people are indeed trying very hard to make her happen. The fact that Vogue UK in particular offered her a cover as a celebrity, was a totally random and a baffling decision, and her presence is still zero. Even the "anonymous" models Vogue UK puts on their covers follow a sort of internal logic of relevance for the UK, this woman must have some powerful backers.
 
You prove my point and like I said Some people are indeed trying very hard to make her happen. The fact that Vogue UK in particular offered her a cover as a celebrity, was a totally random and a baffling decision, and her presence is still zero. Even the "anonymous" models Vogue UK puts on their covers follow a sort of internal logic of relevance for the UK, this woman must have some powerful backers.

Owing a lot to the blood, sweat and tears of Ivan Bart
 
She is not particularly my cup of tea but as long as the model scores a US Vogue's cover i'm delighted. To me she is like Lara Stone commercial side, she looks great though.
 
I'm in personal fitness, very many don't try hard enough to put in the effort to do it, or they're simply not doing it the right way, I believe Kate didn't settle for surgery just to obtain a physique like that, it's utter nonsense and it just goes to show how lazy or how stupid people are when it comes to proper exercise.

I don't think she's had surgery either. I just don't think someone who doesn't have the genes to get such large mammary glands can will themselves to get them.
 
What I find funny is that everyone seems to be so intent on holding on to this antiquated idea of what a supermodel is. Back in the 70's, 80's and 90's and even to some extent the early 2000's it was about commercial and high fashion success, where runway was a must, but the big money was still commercial. This idea is so outdated with the path that fashion has taken it's almost ridiculous in the sense of what a supermodel is.
High fashion rarely if ever translates successfully to commercial modeling, because body types and facial types are so radically different now that it's almost painful to see the cross over. Weird and strange, edgy or gawky makes up the high fashion scene because they are transformable, and mutable, easily staged as props and rarely if ever fully outshine the clothing, which is what they're being paid to sell.
Where as the truly successful commercial model has those soft, or classical features that are more approachable, easily relatable to the average person, and as such much more likely to be considered "super" with model tacked on at the end. People who aren't in fashion can see these women and think "wow she's pretty" not have to do a double take and find the "pretty".
And then, factoring in the modern era, the advent and subsequent take over of the internet and what it's done to modern culture, advertising, and society it's only going to become more prevalent seeing models, and celebrities using the phenomenon that is social networking to expand their portfolio and become a household name.
Vogue dubbed Kate Upton the new breed of supermodel, not only because she is becoming more known across North America, and to some degree the rest of the world, but because she has embraced this new marketing technique and used it to reach out to a larger audience.
So in that sense, the US Vogue cover makes perfect sense. She embodies the best of the both worlds. She's a working model, (not so much in high fashion obviously, but she's doing some commercial work) and she's taking on that role of celebrity that Vogue has obviously embraced over the years.

It's not just Vogue, in reading the editorial you see that some of her peers, (designers and photographers) are jumping on the Kate bandwagan, this new breed of supermodel. I wouldn't be surprised to see in the future more models doing the exact same thing and trying to become an internet sensation.

In other news I personally liked the editorial and the cover, though I will agree that it came across as a little over photo-shopped, but that's nothing new when it comes to any type of fashion spread these days so I'm not overly surprised.
 
I don't find Kate that interesting. I'll still buy this issue because Vogue's content has been fantastic this year but other than that...I'm not that crazy about her...she looks to "normal" for me. She takes the fantasy element out of fashion for me and i don't like that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,165
Messages
15,288,707
Members
89,055
Latest member
Elisteph22
Back
Top