US Vogue September 2016 : Kendall Jenner by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott | the Fashion Spot

US Vogue September 2016 : Kendall Jenner by Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott

Could be worse...at least her expression looks somewhat alive (although she looks like an angry toddler). What the hell is that outfit though :huh:? Appreciate the minimal text layout as well I guess.
 


Photographers:
Mert Alas & Marcus Piggott
Stylist: Tonne Goodman
Make-Up: Isamaya Ffrench
Hair: Garren


vogue.com
 
My response to this is basically written right on the cover.

"K."
 
not enough text to cover this boring shot
 
Actually incredible, very impressed. Kendall looks amazing on the cover.
 
The cover is awfull, the shadow in her boobs looks like a scar! And the ed is like a mix of all US Vogue photographers... very disappointing :(
 
Wow, actually quite impressed with this!! It could have been far worse. Love this sensual side of Kendall, and while the styling is not up my street, it's certainly the most daring we've seen from them. Not impressed with the empty space and logo. It looks unfinished.

Her editorial looks like a whole lot of different stylists contributed, very disoriented. God knows how it will look in the magazine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This cover feels soooooo... empty. That grey background :ninja: it looked horrible on last year's Beyonce cover and it looks even more horrible now. They rarely use plain backgrounds so why now for the biggest issue of the year??? Unbelievable.

The editorial is lovely. Makes me hate the cover even more.
What is she wearing?

Oh and I HATE Mert&Marcus for US Vogue. They're not suited for this magazine. Jansson would've made this better.

That Proenza shot would have made a better cover.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That awful background and outfit ruin the cover imo, cause she doesn´t look bad otherwise. The editorial is better and I think that the first and last images would have made better covers.
 
What a lazy cover. It's a redo of Beyonce's September 2015 cover. How disappointing.

2015/2016: Queen B -> Generation K
2015/2016: Gray background
2015/2016: Gold logo with shadow
2015/2016: Gigantic center-aligned text with Didot font

I am beyond disappointed. And that layout! I have been seriously disappointed with their layout for the past few months. The introduction of the Didot font on the cover hasn't done anything for them.

Gigi's cover looks more September than this one. The energy is missing. She looks beautiful though. And congrats.

However, the editorial is better. The shots feel disconnected, but nonetheless, they look good. And wasn't there any photo from that outdoor setting? Any photo from there would have been perfect for September.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is the most interesting US Vogue cover in a very long time. It's not perfect, but all things considered, I give it thumbs up. They could've gone with something really boring and conventional, but they didn't.

not enough text to cover this boring shot

:lol:

That's gotta be a first to have someone complain about not enough text.
 
I also dislike the texts, but the photo is great and she looks pro!
 
Not bad tbh! Good cover and an even better editorial.

I HATE the grey background and whats with the font???
 
I personally like the way Kendall looks on the cover, but it looks like a mock-up. I don't understand the plain backgrounds that look like they were inserted in Paint, they're so fake!

The editorial I dislike, though. It literally looks it was shot by various different photographers and some images are beyond cheesy (a gold room, anyone? What is that, Trump's apartment?).
 
Cover layout and background - BOOT. The cover image and editorial are surprisingly good! Kendall look especially gorgeous in the shot with the Givenchy jacket.
 
This cover feels quite unusual for Vogue. Everything's paired down except the styling, which is exceptionally bold and whimsical for US Vogue, it's a studio shot, Kendall's hair covering half her face, barely any text, Cover star isn't smiling and even looks a little angry. I have to say, I like the results so much more than I expected to. The inside editorial feels a bit disjointed, but there are several very strong shots. Damnit, Anna, I wasn't supposed to like this!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,435
Messages
15,261,641
Members
88,429
Latest member
SadiaBabyBear
Back
Top