iluvjeisa said:Yeah, that's true, Callidora - about faces. But it is not true about bodies, I don't think. Diversity of faces but not of bodies is the current beauty ideal IMO. And if you look at models there was more diversity during the supermodel days. Cindy C would have had to loose 20 pounds in order to fit into todays crowd.![]()
Lol! Yeah most of them would definitely be too big to work today. But I always think of models being thin as just part of the job, because the fact of the matter is, clothes look better photographed on tall thin women. That doesn't mean the body looks better in general than someone shorter and curvier. The supers were more about showing off themselves rather than the clothes I think, so it would make sense for them to have more meat on their bones so they could be viewed as sexy. Sexiness (at least not overt sexiness) is not a quality looked for in most of today's working models.

waits to be attacked for having an opinion
"Glamazon" = Glamorous Amazon, an amazon is a large, strong, voluptuos and powerful woman like Brigitte Nielsen, Cindy Crawford or Tatjana Patitz.
. Except I've never really understood the allure of Natalia - wont go into detail about that because there's no need and I have a lot of friends who dig her too, so obviously I have acquired some sort of unusual immunity
I'd also reverse the order of your oldies list. Kate's on top in this game...and now she's famous in the US as well thanks to her scandals. Gisele seems to be loosing momentum for some reason. Naomi is an icon, no doubt, retaining much of her beauty, just like Linda and Kate.