How is that hypocritical? They're going to use all the money they get for these pictures for a good cause. Show me any other celebs who do that.I'm aware of that. Still doesn't make them any less hypocritical.
How is that hypocritical? They're going to use all the money they get for these pictures for a good cause. Show me any other celebs who do that.I'm aware of that. Still doesn't make them any less hypocritical.
Really surprised they gave away the pics and quite a few of them intimate (the kids, the kiss...) and then wonder why the pleibs are interested in their private lives like most celebs
How is that hypocritical? They're going to use all the money they get for these pictures for a good cause. Show me any other celebs who do that.
Because they're possibly saving lives? D-listers want fame and money. They don't want to donate their money to charities or adopt children from poor countries or use their image for something positive and selfless. Besides, Brad and Angie are famous, they don't need any more promotion than they currently get. I just find it strange that they get slammed for doing something good. You just can't please everyone, can you?See, I don't know why the use of money towards charity absolves them of using their private lives in a manipulative manner. Besides, philanthropy isn't their only goal by allowing access to these images. They're no different than a D-lister tipping paps off and turning a gas station stop into a photo shoot.
Because they're possibly saving lives? D-listers want fame and money. They don't want to donate their money to charities or adopt children from poor countries or use their image for something positive and selfless. Besides, Brad and Angie are famous, they don't need any more promotion than they currently get. I just find it strange that they get slammed for doing something good. You just can't please everyone, can you?
Besides, Brad and Angie are famous, they don't need any more promotion than they currently get.
its' called earning a living. they're livelihood.They're also wealthy and don't "need" any more money than they currently have. Yet they are still charging $20 million per film because they want more money. Just like they continue to strategically plan photo ops and release photos, even though they don't "need" any more promotion - they want the publicity.
Let's not get sanctimonious here and I wasn't aware that celebrities with lesser stardom are unable to donate their money or time to needed causes as you explicitly stated. Perhaps generosity is a quality only reserved for the few as you are implying. Besides, fame isn't constant and even the likes of these two need self-promotion to remain at their state of relevancy. And why wouldn't they allow the personal lives to be plastered on tabloids and also exchange money towards their causes. It's a great 2 for 1 deal, you know, a win-win situation. But if some are unwilling to see it beyond that, that's their perogative
its' called earning a living. they're livelihood.
if they're going to give the studio so much money why not get a piece of it from their hard work?
Wow, just wow. Where's all the negativity coming from?