There is also another thing and it's culture.
In the US, UK and maybe Anglo-saxon culture, you have this tendency to make everything political and i guess it's hard from your point of view, to see that the world is not responding the way you are to things (and you would say, "the way they should respond").
It's like the Me Too movement. It had a different impact in Anglo-Saxon countries because of the cultural differences and even if we are all part of the occidental world, it's challenging to understand.
I don't think that we should boycott a company because the founder is making childish comments on IG. Maybe it matters to millenials but for me, it's the work that counts. We sometimes believe that it's either black or white but no. Dolce & Gabbana are gay men who have made unpopular comments in the gay community.
I guess it's better to love someone who thinks like you but what else.
But then, i think the Galliano case, the Lagerfeld case, the Chanel case or even the D&G case are different.
People loves Galliano. That's why we were so willing to forgive him. People loves Karl (and are maybe afraid of losing a front row) and that's why they are willing to forgive him even if i don't think his comments are relevant anyway.
Chanel was saved by Churchill and because it was very taboo in Europe to speak about the war era for a longtime. Then, the Weirthemers are still owners of the brand so it's a tricky situation...
I'm sure a lot of people don't even know who Stefano Gabbana is, what he looks like and above all, doesn't care about his comments on IG. One thing is sure, Stefano can do whatever he wants because he is in Europe, in Italy and because he is his own boss. If it was in the USA, believe me that his publicist would be furious and he would have faced a boycott for a longtime.