Designer & Fashion Insiders Behavior (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING) | Page 76 | the Fashion Spot

Designer & Fashion Insiders Behavior (PLEASE READ POST #1 BEFORE POSTING)

Unprofessional post by Karole IMO, mistakes do happen.

Agreed! I just can't get past this whole idea of running to social media as the very first resort, especially when in this case she likely had the opportunity to confront Marc directly. If I would be a prospective curator or project manager I would steer clear of her.
 
Because there's simply not enough beauty brands out there right now. These two would do anything to make a penny, and I mean anything! :lol::lol::lol:


Lancôme Taps Mert & Marcus for Their First Ever Beauty Collab
Jeena Sharma



Lancôme teams up with famed fashion photographers Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott for their first ever beauty collaboration.
The duo, whose work has appeared in Vogue, Interview Magazine, and W, and whose major clients include Dior, Louis Vuitton, and Fendi, have been commissioned to create a capsule makeup collection.

The line will be part of the color cosmetics range for nighttime and include a makeup kit for the eyes, the Eyes Cold as Ice Kit, and one for lips, the Flaming Lips Lip Kit.

There are also liquid eye shadows in four matte-to-glitter shades; an eye-shadow palette in 10 hues; the Teint Idole Ultra Duo Stick, a highlighter-and-blur combination, in two shades, and L'Absolu Rouge lipstick in matte to sheer finishes, WWD reports.

"We have tricks for how we work with our women's lips or eyes, or how we can make their cheeks a little longer," Alas told WWD. "We were interested in taking these photographic techniques and our expertise in beauty into the cosmetics world and developing products out of them."

For the collection, the duo made the "dna of Lancôme" an integral focus, and described the French cosmetics brand's consumer as "sophisticated, elegant, contemporary, Parisian, women of lifestyle and of the day mostly."

Still, don't expect the collection to be subtle or have soft pastel colors. On the contrary, the creatives wanted to "bring saturation; absurdity; a little more surrealism; bold, bigger lips, and eyes bluer than blue."

"For the past 25 years, as image-makers we have worked to break rules, push boundaries and stretch the limits of our acceptance within fashion photography," Alas continued. "Our photography has always tended to be a little on the dark side. I needed more questions, substance and depth. It was important that this rebellion was reflected in our makeup collaboration. We wanted to create a woman for Lancôme who is more nocturnal, to add a dark side to this iconic brand that all women love. After Dark came from there, because we wanted this character to be more of a night cat and slightly more dangerous."

This isn't the first time Lancôme has partnered with creatives for a color cosmetics line. Over the years, the likes of Chiara Ferragni, Proenza Schouler and Olympia Le-Tan have all created capsule collections for the brand.

The limited-edition line is due out in Europe starting in February and the U.S. in March.

Paper Magazine
 
Rolling my eyes so hard right now.

LOL. I used to think Testino was the ultimate shameless star photographer until these two came along. This is just so tasteless, not even factoring in how absolutely irrelevant it is that they're doing a beauty range to begin with. And to think Marcus is actually English. Maybe more the Jodie Marsh strain of English, surely....
 
Agreed! I just can't get past this whole idea of running to social media as the very first resort, especially when in this case she likely had the opportunity to confront Marc directly. If I would be a prospective curator or project manager I would steer clear of her.
If there's a field that rewards immature and petty behavior far more than fashion, that's the dance world, especially among these old-school Balanchine peeps.. I *know* she cried, called 4 people to rant, thought about finally quitting dance but instead decided to confront those who wronged her.. by creating a piece about ~fluid emotions in crisp movements~. Then in her calm and collected self the next morning, she did what is only right: put them on blast on both instagram and Dance Magazine. :lol:

I do cringe a bit at the sloppy work of whoever was in charge of writing the program. Google is your friend when your work takes multidisciplinary/international heights. Crediting the principal dancer of the freakin' milwakee ballet instead of a renowned choreographer (who tends to be the loudest, most visible, freaking-out-for-nothing person in an event).. it takes a special kind. There's also a missing hyphen..
 
I *know* she cried, called 4 people to rant, thought about finally quitting dance but instead decided to confront those who wronged her.. by creating a piece about ~fluid emotions in crisp movements~. Then in her calm and collected self the next morning, she did what is only right: put them on blast on both instagram and Dance Magazine. :lol:..

Dear God, :rofl::rofl::rofl:

But ew, do you read Dance Magazine!?! LOL. They've got the worst (or best) reputation in the industry, depending on who you speak to. Plus I find them terribly elitist (purely based on the type of British companies and artists they spotlight.)
To further just how petty the dance community is, there's literally a section on the website 'Rant & Rave', lol. There you'll mostly find all sorts of takedowns (a smear piece on Sergey Polunin, and other bait-type headlines with names like Billie Eilish, Kendall Jenner and whoever else does not abide by the oh so sacred code and craft of dancing.)
 
But ew, do you read Dance Magazine!?! LOL.
but mostly Dance Spirit :zorro: (live for Kathryn Morgan’s Dear Katie section lol [“should I expect a career at all if my left toes are shorter than my right toes?”]).

Dance being the last thing the average person cares about is a daily complaint.. but the moment any non-dancer touches it or, gasps, dares dressing like a ballerina for an editorial, expect to get s*it.
 
Oh, so this is real. I thought it was made up gossip when I first read about it. So Naomi is burning bridges left and right again, and Edward is acting like a baby from what I've read so far.. interesting.
 
Could a kind soul please share a summary of the Naomi-Edward thing here? I'm petty and gossipy but not enough to give Dailyfail any clicks. :glare:
 
Yes, apparently, this is true...The fallout. I don’t know if it’s about the speech tho.
Yes she owes her (multiple) comeback to Edward but maybe she felt that if she wasn’t on the September issue of US Vogue 1989, her career would have been different...
To fallout over a speech is a bit much IMO.
 
I vehemently disagree that Naomi owes her current relevance to Edward. Seriously? She was doing just fine booking campaigns and acting jobs without being on the cover of British Vogue or being a contributor to the magazine. No one gave a f*** about that.

If this is true, Edward needs to take several seats.
 
Could a kind soul please share a summary of the Naomi-Edward thing here? I'm petty and gossipy but not enough to give Dailyfail any clicks. :glare:
So Naomi won an award.
She didn’t thank Edward in her speech, but she did thank Anna.
Edward was very upset, and send her some harsh texts.
Now Naomi is upset and deleted a bunch of pictures with Edward from her Instagram.
 
Someone in either her or his camp is leaking these stories to the Mail because just last week they basically pushed a prequel to the above version.
I just don't want to belive that anyone could fall out over Liam Payne. Not even Harry, lol.
 
So Naomi won an award.
She didn’t thank Edward in her speech, but she did thank Anna.
Edward was very upset, and send her some harsh texts.
Now Naomi is upset and deleted a bunch of pictures with Edward from her Instagram.

Thank you for coming through, mikel.:heart:

Seems like a truly petty reason to end a 20+ years friendship over if it's true.
 
^^^ It’s the fashion industry; professional and personal relationships have ended over way way way more petty issues. You really need to either already possess-- or conjure a state of arrested development to work in such a realm. (And don’t let them fool you into believing the industry is any gentler or kinder and inclusive. It’s the same old viper pit as it ever was.)
 
What Happened Between E. Jean Carroll and Elle Magazine?

Her contract was terminated early, but the fashion magazine maintains it wasn’t because of her allegations against President Trump.

By Katherine Rosman and Jessica Bennett

  • Feb. 21, 2020
In the fall of 2017, when Nina Garcia, the fashion editor and “Project Runway” judge, became the editor in chief of Elle magazine, E. Jean Carroll felt she needed to fight for her job.

Ms. Garcia was remaking the staff and was scaling back on lucrative contracts the magazine offered freelance contributors like Ms. Carroll, who had written the Ask E. Jean advice column since 1993.

But rather than dash off a pleading email, as many writers might, Ms. Carroll did something more in line with her outsize personality: She showed up at the offices of Hearst Magazines, the publisher of Elle, with a stack of hula hoops. “I said, ‘Here’s some hula hoops, let’s get it going girl!’” she recalled in a phone interview.

Ms. Garcia appeared to love it.

“Oh, my God, I adore E. Jean!” she said in a 2018 interview, about a year after taking over. “She’s just so perfect for this generation. Her voice is so modern, quirky, and cheeky. While everybody on Twitter thinks they could be the E. Jean, she is the E. Jean!”

The same month that the interview ran, Ms. Garcia agreed to provide a blurb for Ms. Carroll’s forthcoming memoir, “What Do We Need Men For?,” praising her work at Elle. At that point, Ms. Carroll had shared the book’s contents with very few people, and Ms. Garcia had not read it.

“E. Jean Carroll is a force of nature, whose natural vibrancy has held readers in rapture for decades,” read Ms. Garcia’s blurb, which was printed on the back cover.

In the book, which recounts stories from her life, Ms. Carroll accuses Donald Trump of r*ping her in a department store dressing room in the mid-1990s. The details were revealed in an excerpt in New York magazine in June of 2019, just before the book was published, and quickly picked up by news outlets around the world.

Mr. Trump denied ever meeting Ms. Carroll, calling her a liar. (“She’s not my type,” he told The Hill.) Several months later, she filed a defamation suit against him. She argued he had damaged her reputation and her career by denying that her story was true, and by saying that she took money from his political opponents to fabricate the allegation.

Elle covered the story, reporting on her book’s revelations and the reaction to them on its website. It also ran a column in print (but not online) last fall in which Ms. Carroll explained why she had decided to come forward at last.

But by December 2019, Elle’s regard for its columnist had changed. Ms. Carroll, 76, was contacted by a Hearst editor, Erin Hobday, who asked if she was free for a call; Ms. Carroll thought she was being invited to the company holiday party.

Instead, she was informed that her contract, which was supposed to go through July of this year, was being terminated. She was asked to invoice for the remaining four columns, which would not be published and for which Ms. Carroll said she still has not been paid.

“We and your readers so appreciate your many years of work for the magazine, and the wonderful columns you contributed to our publication,” Ms. Hobday wrote in an email, adding: “We will miss you tremendously.”

‘A Beloved Voice’

On Feb. 18, Ms. Carroll wrote on Twitter: “Because Trump ridiculed my reputation, laughed at my looks, & dragged me through the mud, after 26 years, ELLE fired me. I don’t blame Elle. It was the great honor of my life writing ‘Ask E. Jean.’ I blame @realdonaldtrump.”

Earlier that day, her lawyers had disclosed in a court filing in connection to her defamation suit against Mr. Trump that Elle had killed the Ask E. Jean column, which had been published virtually every month for 26 years.

In response to a list of questions sent by The New York Times, a Hearst spokeswoman emailed a statement. “E. Jean Carroll was long a beloved voice in the pages of Elle, the decision not to renew her contract was a business decision and had nothing to do with politics,” it said.

Even if Ms. Carroll did not blame Elle, others did, and were quick to say so. Soon, the hashtag #BoycottElleMagazine began appearing on Twitter.

“Extremely disappointing from the woman’s mag that historically has done more hard hitting reporting and taken stands than most,” Clara Jeffery, the editor of Mother Jones magazine, wrote on Twitter.

“If you ever wondered whether women’s magazines are really on the side of women, I think this says all we need to know,” said Nancy Jo Sales, a magazine writer.

Many editors who have worked with Ms. Carroll say Elle has lost an important voice. “E. Jean is an American original and to many, an icon,” said Robbie Myers, the longtime editor of Elle, before Ms. Garcia.

“E. Jean was just so beloved,” said Maggie Bullock, a former deputy editor at Elle. “It seems really sad that a women’s publication that had the chance to align itself with a woman who was speaking her truth — and speaking truth to power — in a time like this, chose not to. What a shortsighted thing to do.”

But inside the Hearst building in Midtown Manhattan this week, some journalists quietly fumed at what they saw as an inaccurate portrayal.

More than a dozen current and former Hearst employees, who spoke to The Times anonymously for fear they would face repercussions in their jobs, attributed Ms. Carroll’s contract termination, at least in part, to a steep paycheck and a break in convention: Ms. Carroll had given away the news-breaking excerpt from her book to New York magazine — not Elle. (The New York cover story, “Hideous Men,” was edited by Laurie Abraham, one of Ms. Carroll’s former editors at Elle. Ms. Abraham now works at The Atlantic.)

Some said that Ms. Carroll’s contention that Mr. Trump’s insults cost her the columnist job was self-serving, since her defamation lawsuit against him will require her to prove she has been damaged by his remarks.

Ms. Carroll dismissed those comments. “The lawsuit is for all women who have been harassed, who cannot speak up and don’t have the money to sue,” Ms. Carroll said. “I am speaking out now for the women who have spoken out and have met their doom. Sometimes you speak out against a man in power and you lose your job.”

Ms. Carroll has been credited with helping to shape the advice column genre and voice, inspiring modern-day iterations like Ask Polly, published by New York magazine, and “Dear Sugars,” an advice column turned podcast.

“She didn’t just toss off a bunch of fluff — she used research, referenced current events and politics, interviewed experts and actually gave real advice that often was as much about helping get a woman’s career on track as a relationship,” said Ms. Bullock, the former Elle editor, now a freelance writer. “Early on, Jean was inclusive and, you could argue, ‘woke.’”

But the days of lucrative magazine contracts are largely a thing of the past. When Ms. Garcia took over Elle, Ms. Carroll was being paid $120,000 a year for 12 columns of about 1,800 words each. (At about $5.50 per word, that was more than twice the $2 per word usually paid to Elle’s freelance writers for the print magazine.)

When Ms. Carroll’s contract came up for renewal during Ms. Garcia’s first year, editors went to bat for Ms. Carroll, arguing that her column had become synonymous with the Elle brand.

Ms. Garcia gave Ms. Carroll a new contract: $60,000 per year for 12 columns of 900 words.

Changing of the Guard

The changes at Elle, many of them in response to the economic challenges of the magazine industry, reflect big shifts at its parent company, Hearst, which is also facing tension with employees who recently unionized.

In 2018, David Carey, the president of Hearst Magazines for eight years, stepped down. Troy Young, who had previously overseen the company’s digital efforts, succeeded him. Since then, most of the high-profile editors who served under Mr. Carey have left. (In 2019, Mr. Carey was named by Hearst Corporation as senior vice president of public affairs and communications.)

Ms. Garcia has worked to put her own stamp on Elle. She has made the magazine more visual, and amped up its social media presence. She has dedicated less space to political features, which had been a hallmark of Elle under its previous editors. Its annual women-in-Washington “Power List” magazine feature and awards dinner was canceled under Ms. Garcia.

She has also worked hard to avoid ruffling feathers, according to some current and former employees. In a 2017 article about Whitney Wolfe, the founder of the dating app Bumble, several paragraphs detailing her perspective on feminism were removed from the digital version of the article after Ms. Wolfe complained that the quotes were taken out of context, according to four former staffers who were aware of the discussions. (Later, Hearst worked with Bumble to start Bumble Mag.)

Last winter, a profile of Dr. Jen Gunter, the ob-gyn (and New York Times columnist) who has been a critic of Gwyneth Paltrow and Goop, was killed after top editors expressed concern that it might upset Ms. Paltrow and her publicist Stephen Huvane, who represents a variety of celebrity clients, according to three former staffers. (Ms. Paltrow appeared on a November 2019 coverof Elle.)

Sources also said a profile of Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, was published in the print magazine but not on the Elle website because of fear it would stoke rage online.

After sending the statement about Ms. Carroll, Hearst did not respond to questions about these editorial decisions.

Shifting Loyalties

By the time Ms. Carroll was deciding where to excerpt her book — and publish her accusation that the sitting president had raped her years before — Ms. Carroll didn’t consider Elle.

“Under Nina, Elle has been less into politics or news,” Ms. Carroll said. “Nina’s Elle is a fashion magazine. So I went with New York magazine, which knows how to break news.”

That decision was revealed to Elle editors over drinks at the Russian Tea Room last spring, where Ms. Carroll and a few of the editors had gone to celebrate the upcoming publication of her book. It was there that she told the editors what the book was about — including what she had written about Mr. Trump — and that an excerpt containing this revelation would be running in New York magazine.

“They were extremely disappointed,” Ms. Carroll said of the Elle editors.

They told Ms. Carroll that they were shocked, both by what she said had happened to her and by the fact that she had not given Elle first dibs on the excerpt.

By the terms of her contract, Ms. Carroll was not required to offer her story to Elle. But she agreed to help facilitate a phone call between Elle editors, her agent and a representative of her book publisher.

The excerpt still was published by New York.

When it came time to make budget cuts this past December, Hearst employees said, few felt lingering loyalty to Ms. Carroll. That’s when Ms. Hobday told her she had been cut loose.

In a statement, Ms. Garcia, said: “E. Jean and I have known each other for more than two decades and she will always be part of the Elle DNA. We applaud and support her for coming forward with telling her story. The response to her allegations were not a factor in not renewing her contract.”

Ms. Carroll is under no illusion that she was carrying the magazine into the next era. “I AM old, unhip and uncool, yes,” she wrote on Twitter. But she doesn’t believe Elle gave her the boot simply because it couldn’t afford her. “I would have taken a new contract for less money,” she said.

By Thursday, Ms. Carroll said she had received inquiries from four other publications asking if she would consider writing for them.

New York Times
 
EXCLUSIVE: HEARST TELLS EDITORS TO WORK FROM HOME FOLLOWING MILAN CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK
written by Charles Manning February 26, 2020

The fashion world is on high alert following the outbreak of more than 300 confirmed cases of coronavirus in Italy over the last few days, most of them in and around Milan. As the Fall 2020 shows continue in Europe, Hearst is taking steps to sequester potentially infected staff by enacting new policies that requires anyone who has traveled to Italy in the last 30 days to work from home for at least 14 days after returning to the US, only reentering their offices if they are symptom-free following the two-week waiting period.

Today, Hearst Magazines president Troy Young sent the following memo to the company’s US-based staff:

Hi All,

We’ve been closely following the news and meeting regularly about COVID-19 and the impact it is having around the world.

As the virus continues to spread, the safety and well-being of our employees remains our primary focus.

We know there are questions about what this means for those who are traveling, for either business or personal reasons. We are working through this in real time, as the situation quickly evolves, and will provide updates as they become available.

Here are our guidelines for Hearst Magazines U.S.:

Non-essential travel to China, Iran, Italy, Japan and South Korea is not advised. Employees returning from any of these countries within the last 30 days are required to work from home for 14 days and should return to work only if they’re symptom-free after that time. If you are scheduled to travel to one of the impacted areas for business, please cancel your plans.

Employees who have recently traveled throughout Europe and are experiencing flu-like symptoms should consult a doctor and contact HR before returning to work. Following guidance, they may be asked to work from home until cleared by their doctor.

In general, employees who have symptoms of acute respiratory illness should stay home and not come to work until they are free of fever (100° F/37.8° C or greater using an oral thermometer), show no signs of a fever and have had no other symptoms for at least 24 hours without the use of fever-reducing or other symptom-altering medicines (e.g. cough suppressants). Employees should notify their supervisor and stay home if they are sick.

Our European and Asian businesses will continue to follow the guidelines of their local government health agencies.

If you are concerned about the coronavirus, you can access Hearst’s Live and Work Well program for free emotional support. The helpline is available 24/7 by calling 1-866-248-4096.

You can also visit the CDC and World Health Organization websites for the latest information about the virus, its prevention and treatment, what to do if you are sick, answers to frequently asked questions and more.

I realize people may be feeling anxious, but I encourage everyone to go about their daily lives to the best of their ability. We’ll be sure to keep you informed if and when we make updates to any protocols.

Troy

Troy Young
President, Hearst Magazines


According to an anonymous source inside Hearst, this policy was relayed to staff abroad, including editors attending the shows, before the release of the internal company memo, although they could not be more specific than that.

The memo does not outline any specific plan of action for editors heading to Paris from Milan, although a representative from Hearst told The Daily that “editors traveled to Paris from Milan before we put any new guidelines into effect” adding that the company would be “following developments and making decisions in real time based on how situation is evolving.”

As of the time of this posting, it does not appear that Hearst has ordered any of their employees to cut their Europe trips short.

We will update this post if and when more information becomes available.

Fashionweekdaily
 
EXCLUSIVE: HEARST TELLS EDITORS TO WORK FROM HOME FOLLOWING MILAN CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK
written by Charles Manning February 26, 2020

The fashion world is on high alert following the outbreak of more than 300 confirmed cases of coronavirus in Italy over the last few days, most of them in and around Milan. As the Fall 2020 shows continue in Europe, Hearst is taking steps to sequester potentially infected staff by enacting new policies that requires anyone who has traveled to Italy in the last 30 days to work from home for at least 14 days after returning to the US, only reentering their offices if they are symptom-free following the two-week waiting period.

Today, Hearst Magazines president Troy Young sent the following memo to the company’s US-based staff:

Hi All,

We’ve been closely following the news and meeting regularly about COVID-19 and the impact it is having around the world.

As the virus continues to spread, the safety and well-being of our employees remains our primary focus.

We know there are questions about what this means for those who are traveling, for either business or personal reasons. We are working through this in real time, as the situation quickly evolves, and will provide updates as they become available.

Here are our guidelines for Hearst Magazines U.S.:

Non-essential travel to China, Iran, Italy, Japan and South Korea is not advised. Employees returning from any of these countries within the last 30 days are required to work from home for 14 days and should return to work only if they’re symptom-free after that time. If you are scheduled to travel to one of the impacted areas for business, please cancel your plans.

Employees who have recently traveled throughout Europe and are experiencing flu-like symptoms should consult a doctor and contact HR before returning to work. Following guidance, they may be asked to work from home until cleared by their doctor.

In general, employees who have symptoms of acute respiratory illness should stay home and not come to work until they are free of fever (100° F/37.8° C or greater using an oral thermometer), show no signs of a fever and have had no other symptoms for at least 24 hours without the use of fever-reducing or other symptom-altering medicines (e.g. cough suppressants). Employees should notify their supervisor and stay home if they are sick.

Our European and Asian businesses will continue to follow the guidelines of their local government health agencies.

If you are concerned about the coronavirus, you can access Hearst’s Live and Work Well program for free emotional support. The helpline is available 24/7 by calling 1-866-248-4096.

You can also visit the CDC and World Health Organization websites for the latest information about the virus, its prevention and treatment, what to do if you are sick, answers to frequently asked questions and more.

I realize people may be feeling anxious, but I encourage everyone to go about their daily lives to the best of their ability. We’ll be sure to keep you informed if and when we make updates to any protocols.

Troy

Troy Young
President, Hearst Magazines


According to an anonymous source inside Hearst, this policy was relayed to staff abroad, including editors attending the shows, before the release of the internal company memo, although they could not be more specific than that.

The memo does not outline any specific plan of action for editors heading to Paris from Milan, although a representative from Hearst told The Daily that “editors traveled to Paris from Milan before we put any new guidelines into effect” adding that the company would be “following developments and making decisions in real time based on how situation is evolving.”

As of the time of this posting, it does not appear that Hearst has ordered any of their employees to cut their Europe trips short.

We will update this post if and when more information becomes available.

Fashionweekdaily
We have the same policy at my office in Australia for anyone who has been to Italy or Asia. Can't imagine it was good for fashion week!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,467
Messages
15,303,879
Members
89,478
Latest member
Katerinaizomeria
Back
Top