JPineapple
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2018
- Messages
- 2,921
- Reaction score
- 4,091
Are Rianne and Freja a couple?
Announcing... The 3rd annual theFashionSpot Awards for 2025. Vote NOW via the links below:
Designer of the YearThank you for participating!
VOTING WILL CLOSE 29/12/2025 EOD!
Hahaha true. But I actually think Freja is still with Kim.The stud strikes again! Lol. At this point I'm amazed that Freja's bedpost isn't collapsing from all those notches. She'd probably be able to open a boutique modelling agency of her own filled only with exes/hookups/whatever she calls it.
Joan Smalls, Jourdan Dunn, Stella Maxwell, Elsa Hosk... I guess Saudi trips paid by the anti-gay anti-women government is better than nothing.
Plus Halima Aden, Irina Shayk.....
This is a slippery slope. I understand the criticism, but if you rail against these models you also have to rail against Vogue Arabia, all the top models and photographers who shoot for them, designers going over there for trunk shows. It just seems a bit like cherry-picking to me because these girls are easy targets.
Just wondering, does the Saudi government fund Vogue Arabia and the designers?
Because a lot of the criticism has to do with the music festival being funded by the government/state owned enterprise as opposed to a private company.
This one, because this issue is kinda complex; on one side it has to be these models' fault (which isn't something I thought, except for some in my TL), but on another I suspect there's something that actually made them do this, like... contracts? Anything?Plus Halima Aden, Irina Shayk.....
This is a slippery slope. I understand the criticism, but if you rail against these models you also have to rail against Vogue Arabia, all the top models and photographers who shoot for them, designers going over there for trunk shows. It just seems a bit like cherry-picking to me because these girls are easy targets.
Correct, they are not funded by the government, but the mere fact that they are allowed to be there is from the tacit approval of Saudis. At the core, the main issue is really that these models are benefitting from a system that is anti-women/anti-gay and all sorts of other freedom are curbed. The only distinction is that their cheques were cut directly by the government while Vogue Arabia and everyone else associated with them are getting their riches from the public, which is under the firm grip of the government. To me, there's really no distinction. Especially since Vogue Arabia doesn't function under their own autonomy, they are censored, just like Chinese and Russian Vogue.
If you have a problem with this you should have a problem with brands making money off those territories, magazines who set up shop in that region, pop stars who perform there, the list goes on.
Just want to clear up that I think, in general, models, brands/pop stars, gay men and women who vacation there and so forth have the right to do as they wish. It becomes murky when it is the SJWs or companies doing so who preach a heavily liberal message on the one hand, and do something else on the other. Someone like Halima Aden, whose entire modelling career is politicised. Just weeks ago Vogue launched their so-called Vogue Values guideline and the very last one reads:
We speak with a unified voice across 26 editions standing for the values of diversity, responsibility and respect for individuals, communities and for our natural environment.
Maybe I'm reading it wrong and that only really entails ditching fur and plastic, and recycling piggy poo.
Yikes, how much money did the Saudis spend to get all those models and celebrities to attend? Not bothered about influencers and riff-raff like Sofia Richie, Scott Disick and Luka Sabbat, they really have no qualms how they make their money.
And to think Halima Aden is supposed to be a UN Ambassador.....
If they were posting from Saudi they wouldn't have to disclose it. This law only applies in the US and any other countries that have passed the law. In Australia our influencers do not have to disclose ads or sponsorships.It's also interesting to note that there was no promo as a lead up to the festival. All the pics were posted the day of and the influencers left right away haha. I think they all knew they were gonna get intense backlash, but decided that the check was worth it. I wouldn't doubt that many of them were brainwashed too. There definitely must have been a gag order or a strict contract from saying anything negative despite public pressure.
It also bothers me that none of the influencers explicitly disclosed that they were paid for this trip. This had to be an arrangement because you can get in legal trouble for not stating this. Again, the money must have been so good that they were willing to risk it their reputation and legality.
This one, because this issue is kinda complex; on one side it has to be these models' fault (which isn't something I thought, except for some in my TL), but on another I suspect there's something that actually made them do this, like... contracts? Anything?
Besides, cancel culture doesn't even work.