Natacha Ramsay-Levi Leaving Chloé, *Update* Gabriela Hearst Announced as Creative Director

It's always sad to see such harsh comments on someone, even more when they are coming from a woman and are directed to another woman.
Even if Ramsay-Levi is "useless", she was very useful for Nicolas Ghesquiere and that was enough for Richemont to hire her.

Let's give her the chance to move the house forward.
It will be interesting to see a Chloé vision by a french woman.
 
It's always sad to see such harsh comments on someone, even more when they are coming from a woman and are directed to another woman.
Even if Ramsay-Levi is "useless", she was very useful for Nicolas Ghesquiere and that was enough for Richemont to hire her.

Let's give her the chance to move the house forward.
It will be interesting to see a Chloé vision by a french woman.

I have a right to my opinion, whether you agree with it or not.

Second don't try use identity politics here, this is not the venue for that. As a women I always champion talented women but at the same token talent should supersede all else.
Styling a couple of collections and being an instagram party girl are not credentials for being at the helm of a storied house like Chloe.
Being a member on this board for almost 11 years its sad to see how fashion has gone down hill. Heatheranne also concurred with me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
THAT SAID, I also think she was the cause of Ghesquiere's slow decline and is directly responsible for his string of flat collections.

How's that even possible? The one in charge is him, so he is the ultimate responsible of his flat collections.
 
As a women I always champion talented women but at the same token talent should supersede all else.

Agreed. Being a feminist means wanting equal opportunities, not wanting to see get something strictly because they are female, but because they are just as qualified as a man.

I'm a feminist through-and-through, and as such can think of dozens of females with more impressive resumes than hers that would have been perfect for the house.

I wasn't planning on chiming in again, but like disco54, a nerve was struck when my personal politics were (even if not directly) challenged.
 
:shock:

Clare Waight Keller Reportedly in Talks with Givenchy
By Paige Reddinger | February 17, 2017

Former Chloé creative director, Clare Waight Keller, is reportedly in talks with Givenchy for the creative director role, according to sources in Paris. Keller officially departed Chloé in early January, though rumors of her departure began months beforehand. Her last day with the French house will be March 31, and she’ll present her final collection for Chloé in Paris on March 2. That said, it could be a few months before Givenchy is able to announce her appointment, unless the house decides to go with another candidate for the creative director position left empty by Riccardo Tisci.

Just recently, Off-White’s Virgil Abloh was suspected of being considered for the role, but the French house quickly denied to WWD—who first reported Abloh was in talks with the brand—that they had ever approached the designer.

Keller has been commuting from her native London to Paris since June to helm Chloé, where she has been creative director for the past six years. A request to comment from Givenchy has not immediately been returned. Watch this space for updates.

Source: https://fashionweekdaily.com/clare-waight-keller-reportedly-talks-givenchy/
 
^you should check her Pringle, it was really different than Chloé ;)
 
Please no. I quite like the codes Tisci has created for Givenchy, please no more pretty clothes that has barely any soul. Givenchy needs edge, not run of the mill prettiness.

Givenchy has edge? Where?
 
Richemont's Fashion Business: A Health Check
The Swiss luxury conglomerate has failed to turn brands like Chloé and Dunhill into a soft-luxury empire that can take on Kering and LVMH. Can recent operational changes turn the tide?

By Laure Guilbault November 8, 2019 17:42
PARIS, France — Over the past year, Compagnie Financière Richemont SA has made a series of strategic moves in a bid to shake up its struggling fashion business. But lacklustre results in the first half of its most recent fiscal year indicate the Swiss luxury conglomerate still has a long way to go before it can compete with rivals LVMH and Kering when it comes to soft luxury.

Richemont reported operating profit of €1.17 billion ($1.29 billion), below analyst expectations, as the market leader in watches and jewellery saw negative impact from the ongoing pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. Net profit was down 61 percent in the period to €869 million.

Revenues in the segment which includes its fashion brands including Chloé, Dunhill and Alaïa, grew 1 percent in the period to €941 million, citing “mixed performance across the maisons.” (Richemont does not provide sales or profits of individual brands.)

Analysts have speculated for years that Richemont may look to offload its remaining soft luxury brands, or that it would merge with Kering to take on the might of LVMH. And while Richemont’s value is little changed from where it was five years ago, LVMH’s market value has soared ahead, hitting the €200 billion mark this week.

“It has been a long time that investors have questioned the validity of the fashion businesses,” said luxury analyst Mario Ortelli.

And yet, Richemont remains committed to its soft luxury operations, underscored by a recent string of changes made at the group. Earlier this autumn Richemont’s head of fashion departed, and last week it announced that Chloé Chief Executive Geoffroy de la Bourdonnaye would leave the business: moves seen as part of a broader effort to boost Richemont's standing in the soft-luxury sector. Given that the group’s core competencies — jewellery and watches — have been threatened by macro trends (the decline of the watch business) and stiffer competition (especially if LVMH succeeds in its $14.5 million bid for Tiffany & Co.) a stronger fashion arm would take some of the heat off.

Below, BoF breaks down the current state of play at Richemont's fashion houses.

AZFashion

The conglomerate recently announced a joint venture with star designer Alber Elbaz, describing the project as “an innovative and dynamic start-up, meant to turn dreams into reality.” While the fashion industry awaits further details on the tie-up with anticipation, Richemont will have its work cut out for them to make it a financial success.


Launching a new fashion brand around a designer with no proven track record of attracting Gen-Z consumers is a risky and expensive proposition. Richemont’s expectations for the project seem to be contained. (The brand will be project-based and majority-owned by the conglomerate.) But, “it is unlikely that a start-up — even with a talented designer at the helm — can move the needle for Richemont’s fashion business,” Ortelli said.

Chloé

Chloé, the largest and most relevant label in Richemont’s fashion portfolio, has felt the impact of two key departures this year: Eric Vallat as Richemont's head of fashion and accessories, and Geoffroy de la Bourdonnaye, who will be replaced as Chloé chief executive by former Maison Margiela CEO Riccardo Bellini. Richemont Chief Executive Jérôme Lambert described the management changes as “a key element for success,” adding on Friday's analyst call that Chloé “has [doubled] its turnover in less than five years.”

According to Morgan Stanley estimates, Chloé generated sales of €510 million —representing just 4 percent of Richemont’s group sales — in the fiscal year ending March 2019, although it was not profitable.

Natacha Ramsay-Levi, who joined Chloé as creative director in 2017 after a years-long partnership with Nicolas Ghesquière at Balenciaga and Louis Vuitton, has yet to produce a blockbuster accessory that would take the brand to the next level. Rumours have persisted she would soon exit the house, speculations the company denies.

It is unlikely that a start-up — even with a talented designer at the helm — can move the needle for Richemont’s fashion business.

“The identity of the collection under the creative leadership of Natacha Ramsay Levi is taking time to come across,” Ortelli said, also noting that Chloé is a gendered brand in an increasingly “gender fluid” market and at a time when it is hard for a mid-size fashion brand “to compete with the big gorillas in the room.” (Brands backed by the big fashion groups, LVMH and Kering, benefit from being able to tap into a vast retail real estate network — allowing them to scale their direct-to-consumer businesses faster — as well as bigger marketing budgets, which also aids in customer acquisition.)

One of Bellini’s first tasks will be to unlock the potential of Ramsay-Levi, whose current contract runs until March 2020, according to sources.

He will also be tasked with developing the brand’s accessories including leather goods, which currently account for approximately 60 percent of sales, as well as reduce its reliance on department stores. If Bellini can guide the label into stronger performances in key markets, “there is no denying that Chloé has good potential,” said Bernstein analyst Luca Solca.



Alaïa

The iconic label appointed Myriam Serrano as Chief Executive in September, but two years after the passing of the beloved designer, it has yet to articulate a plan for future growth, which will likely be rooted it its promising accessories business. Net sales were approximately €65 million in fiscal year 2017, according to Morgan Stanley estimates.

At some point, the company will also need to figure out how it plans to carry on creatively, whether that means hiring a new creative director to move the vision forward or continuing to rely on its vast archives for the time being.

Dunhill

British heritage label Dunhill's sales stood at €160 million in fiscal year 2019 and is likely unprofitable, according to Morgan Stanley Equity Analyst Edouard Aubin. Current Chief Executive Andrew Maag, who was brought in at the beginning of 2017 from Burberry, hired former Mark Weston as creative director, although his collections have yet to make significant headway on the menswear scene.

The real opportunity for Richemont’s fashion business could be in potential synergies with the group’s luxury e-commerce entity Yoox Net-a-Porter Group (YNAP). Lambert said that the first six months of the year have seen a further reinforcement of the link between YNAP and the rest of the group’s fashion activity.

Additional streamlining of the current portfolio after the shedding of Lancel last year seems unlikely, as do any further acquisitions. With LVMH soaring ahead of the competition, maybe a mega-merger between Kering and Richemont would be their best bet.

quite interesting!
surprised they're not making any profit, she'll definitely be on her way out next year.
 
^price point is crazy. Chloe is even more expensive than before and there is some issue with the fitting of her collections. Plus, no interesting bag so no success for her.
 
It's quite sad tho in this day and age that all designers are expected to have the Alessandro Michele Gucci effect immediately following their first collection.

I would think it is normal for sales to taper off or at least remain steady when a new designer takes over. It's a transition period for the house to find its footing and for the customer to accept it or discover it. It all seems a bit rushed in terms of expectations.
 
My heart skipped a beat when I saw the preview title 'Claire Waight Keller leaving....' :lol:

Brands backed by the big fashion groups, LVMH and Kering, benefit from being able to tap into a vast retail real estate network — allowing them to scale their direct-to-consumer businesses faster — as well as bigger marketing budgets, which also aids in customer acquisition.

This is undoubtedly true in so many ways and I think it's one of Chloe's biggest drawbacks. And even though I can't stand Natacha's aesthetic, that the brand is not performing well has got absolutely nothing to do with her bags and clothes. The fault lies with the suits and marketing. This year particularly, LVMH and Kering followed a very ruthless marketing offense for their brands. When you flip open a magazine in any key luxury capitals of the world the advertising slots are Vuitton/Gucci/Chanel/Celine/Prada/Ralph Lauren > Table of contents > Bottega, Valentino, maybe McQueen or McCartney > features > Balenciaga in the middle, and Givenchy for the last 3 pages of the magazine. This sequence is 90% guaranteed. Chloe would be lucky to get a 2-page ad nestled in there which wouldn't even end up impacting enough because their visuals aren't strong enough and the space is too limited. So they never even had a chance.
Just last month VP gave their cover to Vuitton as part of an interview and advertorial, and 3 weeks later Nicolas appeared on the cover of Elle France along with his muses in a 10-page setup. And whenever that's not happening, you have money being thrown at splashy advertorials and store designs for Vuitton, covers going to Chanel and Gucci, interviews with Kim Jones and Maria Grazia, and Kering making sure their new boy wonder at Bottega is getting a grand marketing strategy that befits the hype around him. They've monopolised so much prime advertising real estate, even leaving no space for the annual H&M collab which used to be able to get some coverage around November. And we all know that H&M can actually afford big advertising campaigns, unlike smaller luxury houses. Considering how much these conglomerates made this year, I predict they will only get worse next year. LVMH and Kering are the Facebook and Youtube of the media world - they need to be pulled in order but it won't happen anytime soon because they're sitting with all the cards, money!

Earlier this year Natacha showed resort in Shanghai with a line which was layered heavily with Chinese influences. It was more a sign that the brand is ready to expand and make some money. While the move is fine, it's just not enough to make a real impression because everyone else is already doing that way better than her, their brands are also on the radar of the Chinese, and the clothes are omnipresent enough. Same can't be said for Chloe and there are so many others in exactly the same boat, Burberry and Lanvin immediately come to mind!

As for Alaia, I reckon the house codes are still remarkably relevant in a cultural sense. So all they really need is a strong designer to take charge and further on that for a few years before trying a new direction. Artistically, I think Alaia must be run like Herrera or ODLR. It can't be an entirely different direction, if that's the case then just shut the brand down. But it all depends on what their plan is for the house. Renzo didn't hire Galliano to make him a lot of money on the outset, it just sorts of happened gradually and now Margiela is also a brand predicted to be highly profitable. Not sure how that will go because the business model isn't set up that way.
 
Last edited:
Just admit it Richemont guys cannot do fashion (app and acc...), they are all about jewelry and watches. Lancel becomes profitable right after Richemont sold it. It is very ironic condisdering when Richemont acquired Lancel in the 90's, Lancel's gross profit margin was even higher than Louis Vuitton!

Now Mr la Bourdonnaye is leaving, Natacha is bound to be out of game very soon...
 
BTW Natacha's contract will expire next march...:doh:
 
BTW Natacha's contract will expire next march...:doh:
It’s really a pity...
When I see what Dossena has managed to do with Paco Rabanne! If Chloe prices were at that level, it would have been perfect.

I wonder what could be next for her...Going back to Nicolas at Vuitton is a bit of a downgrade...
 
I wonder what could be next for her...Going back to Nicolas at Vuitton is a bit of a downgrade...

If she does leave Chloe as we expect, it'll be a shame for her not to become a creative director of another brand. I think she has proven that she can lead a brand and build a strong direction - when it's not diluted by the suits. She just needs a strong accessories designer in her team.
 
If she does leave Chloe as we expect, it'll be a shame for her not to become a creative director of another brand. I think she has proven that she can lead a brand and build a strong direction - when it's not diluted by the suits. She just needs a strong accessories designer in her team.
But the question is « where »?
Because, I love her fashion but I think that her kind of edgy, very pushy kind of fashion has more it place in a contemporary market (Acne Studios) than in a luxury.
But I feel like she wanted to prove that she can do everything (bags, shoes, campaigns) and with contemporary brands, accessories almost comes last.
 
But the question is « where »?
Because, I love her fashion but I think that her kind of edgy, very pushy kind of fashion has more it place in a contemporary market (Acne Studios) than in a luxury.
But I feel like she wanted to prove that she can do everything (bags, shoes, campaigns) and with contemporary brands, accessories almost comes last.

To be honest I think she'd be a better fit at Givenchy than Clare is.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top