Les_Sucettes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 3,128
- Reaction score
- 278
Fair enough you and others see a high fashion oasis relief in this tribute/inspiration/reference rather than Meisel ripping off Penn wholesale. We really are in a deep deep deep fashion creative recession when such a blatant and lazy rip-off is swoonworthy.
I agree with you. Actually it is because Meisel is such an exquisite photographer that he has been getting away with this for years, half his oeuvre is a refined reworking of other people's work. It's beautiful, because it was beautiful the first way around, it is hard to be negative about imagery that you are fascinated a priori. He enhances what people are familiar and already comfortable with, it's easy to achieve consensus like that, in recent years in my opinion when he does not have the crutch of other artists' visual work as a starting point his own imagery has become quite weak.
And that would be fine no one can take from his achievements anymore, the problem for Meisel, is that lately his "homages" are becoming pastiches and that grates.
Last edited by a moderator: